From patchwork Thu Aug 16 16:37:14 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: zhong jiang X-Patchwork-Id: 10567865 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A73D139A for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 16:49:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A3312B3BD for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 16:49:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 5E82D2B46F; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 16:49:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58492B3BD for ; Thu, 16 Aug 2018 16:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728201AbeHPTss (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2018 15:48:48 -0400 Received: from szxga07-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.35]:55683 "EHLO huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727410AbeHPTsp (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Aug 2018 15:48:45 -0400 Received: from DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.60]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 5797E67A84743; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:49:05 +0800 (CST) Received: from linux-ibm.site (10.175.102.37) by DGGEMS404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.399.0; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:49:09 +0800 From: zhong jiang To: CC: , , , Subject: [PATCHv4 2/3] btrfs: change btrfs_free_reserved_bytes to be void funtion Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:37:14 +0800 Message-ID: <1534437435-51605-3-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.12.4 In-Reply-To: <1534437435-51605-1-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.com> References: <1534437435-51605-1-git-send-email-zhongjiang@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.102.37] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP btrfs_free_reserved_bytes use the variable "ret" for return return value, but it is not modified after initialzation. Further, I find that any of the callers do not handle the return value, so it is safe to drop the unneeded "ret" and make it to be void function. Signed-off-by: zhong jiang --- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c index f77226d..ff305f5 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c @@ -6464,11 +6464,10 @@ static int btrfs_add_reserved_bytes(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache, * reserve set to 0 in order to clear the reservation. */ -static int btrfs_free_reserved_bytes(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache, - u64 num_bytes, int delalloc) +static void btrfs_free_reserved_bytes(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache, + u64 num_bytes, int delalloc) { struct btrfs_space_info *space_info = cache->space_info; - int ret = 0; spin_lock(&space_info->lock); spin_lock(&cache->lock); @@ -6481,7 +6480,6 @@ static int btrfs_free_reserved_bytes(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache, cache->delalloc_bytes -= num_bytes; spin_unlock(&cache->lock); spin_unlock(&space_info->lock); - return ret; } void btrfs_prepare_extent_commit(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) {