| Message ID | 20140220144428.GA31816@localhost.localdomain (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted, archived |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/btrfs-image.c b/btrfs-image.c index 7bcfc06..2be54a7 100644 --- a/btrfs-image.c +++ b/btrfs-image.c @@ -1521,7 +1521,8 @@ static int fixup_chunk_tree_block(struct mdrestore_struct *mdres, type = btrfs_stack_chunk_type(&chunk); type &= (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM | - BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA); + BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA | + BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP); btrfs_set_stack_chunk_type(&chunk, type); btrfs_set_stack_chunk_num_stripes(&chunk, 1);
During restoring of image (-r using btrfs-image) we zero out RAID profile in chunk type but forget to save BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP if present. This results in some false messages being printed by btrfsck. $ ./mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdb2 -f $ ./btrfs-image /dev/sdb2 btrfs_image_output $ ./btrfs-image -r btrfs_image_output disk-image $ ./btrfsck disk-image Checking filesystem on disk-image UUID: e644be2d-7701-4bd4-8804-7487f560d2a7 checking extents Chunk[256, 228, 20971520]: length(8388608), offset(20971520), type(2) mismatch with block group[20971520, 192, 8388608]: offset(8388608), objectid(20971520), flags(34) Chunk[256, 228, 29360128]: length(1073741824), offset(29360128), type(4) mismatch with block group[29360128, 192, 1073741824]: offset(1073741824), objectid(29360128), flags(36) Block group[20971520, 8388608] (flags = 34) didn't find the relative chunk. Block group[29360128, 1073741824] (flags = 36) didn't find the relative chunk. Even though ./btrfsck on /dev/sdb2 seemed fine. This is due to type mismatch above and type mismatch occured because we zero'ed out BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP while handling chunk trees. Signed-off-by: Rakesh Pandit <rakesh@tuxera.com> --- btrfs-image.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)