From patchwork Tue Feb 21 08:34:35 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Qu Wenruo X-Patchwork-Id: 9584037 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6F7600CA for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 08:35:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBCAA288E0 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 08:35:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id E09F7288E4; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 08:35:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99BA3288E0 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 08:35:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751515AbdBUIfI (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2017 03:35:08 -0500 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([59.151.112.132]:25417 "EHLO heian.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751483AbdBUIfC (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2017 03:35:02 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,518,1449504000"; d="scan'208";a="15798795" Received: from unknown (HELO cn.fujitsu.com) ([10.167.33.5]) by heian.cn.fujitsu.com with ESMTP; 21 Feb 2017 16:34:49 +0800 Received: from G08CNEXCHPEKD01.g08.fujitsu.local (unknown [10.167.33.80]) by cn.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2335E46701DE for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:34:46 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.167.226.34) by G08CNEXCHPEKD01.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:34:43 +0800 From: Qu Wenruo To: Subject: [PATCH v3 09/12] btrfs-progs: fsck-test: Make 013 compatible with lowmem mode Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:34:35 +0800 Message-ID: <20170221083438.25719-10-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.11.1 In-Reply-To: <20170221083438.25719-1-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <20170221083438.25719-1-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.167.226.34] X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: 2335E46701DE.AE839 X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP fsck-tests/013-extent-tree-rebuild uses "--init-extent-tree", which implies "--repair". But the test script doesn't specify "--repair" for lowmem mode test to detect it. Add it so lowmem mode test can be happy with it. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo --- tests/fsck-tests/013-extent-tree-rebuild/test.sh | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tests/fsck-tests/013-extent-tree-rebuild/test.sh b/tests/fsck-tests/013-extent-tree-rebuild/test.sh index 37bdcd9c..08c1e50e 100755 --- a/tests/fsck-tests/013-extent-tree-rebuild/test.sh +++ b/tests/fsck-tests/013-extent-tree-rebuild/test.sh @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ test_extent_tree_rebuild() $SUDO_HELPER $TOP/btrfs check $TEST_DEV >& /dev/null && \ _fail "btrfs check should detect failure" - run_check $SUDO_HELPER $TOP/btrfs check --init-extent-tree $TEST_DEV + run_check $SUDO_HELPER $TOP/btrfs check --repair --init-extent-tree $TEST_DEV run_check $SUDO_HELPER $TOP/btrfs check $TEST_DEV }