From patchwork Tue Feb 21 08:34:32 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Qu Wenruo X-Patchwork-Id: 9584027 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5699600CA for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 08:35:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F661288E7 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 08:35:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 93CA0288EA; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 08:35:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ACDD288E4 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 08:35:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751457AbdBUIe5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2017 03:34:57 -0500 Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([59.151.112.132]:25417 "EHLO heian.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751082AbdBUIer (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2017 03:34:47 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,518,1449504000"; d="scan'208";a="15798780" Received: from unknown (HELO cn.fujitsu.com) ([10.167.33.5]) by heian.cn.fujitsu.com with ESMTP; 21 Feb 2017 16:34:43 +0800 Received: from G08CNEXCHPEKD01.g08.fujitsu.local (unknown [10.167.33.80]) by cn.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B9047C4E8D for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:34:44 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.167.226.34) by G08CNEXCHPEKD01.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:34:42 +0800 From: Qu Wenruo To: Subject: [PATCH v3 06/12] btrfs-progs: lowmem check: Fix silent error if first inode item missing Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:34:32 +0800 Message-ID: <20170221083438.25719-7-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.11.1 In-Reply-To: <20170221083438.25719-1-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <20170221083438.25719-1-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.167.226.34] X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: 70B9047C4E8D.AF1B8 X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP If first inode item is missing, lowmem check will detect it but not output any error message. Add error message for it. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo --- cmds-check.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/cmds-check.c b/cmds-check.c index cf5a08ce..7d273623 100644 --- a/cmds-check.c +++ b/cmds-check.c @@ -5001,6 +5001,8 @@ static int check_fs_first_inode(struct btrfs_root *root, unsigned int ext_ref) if (ret > 0) { ret = 0; err |= INODE_ITEM_MISSING; + error("first inode item of root %llu is missing", + root->objectid); } err |= check_inode_item(root, &path, ext_ref);