Message ID | 20170823181509.19816-1-bo.li.liu@oracle.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 12:15:09PM -0600, Liu Bo wrote: > flush_epd_write_bio() sets bio->bi_ops by itself to honor REQ_SYNC, > but it's not needed at all since bio->bi_ops has set up properly in > both __extent_writepage() and write_one_eb(), and in the case of > write_one_eb(), it also sets REQ_META, which we will lose in > flush_epd_write_bio(). > > This remove this unnecessary bio->bi_ops setting. Nitpick: it's bi_op, not bi_ops. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 07:10:41AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 12:15:09PM -0600, Liu Bo wrote: > > flush_epd_write_bio() sets bio->bi_ops by itself to honor REQ_SYNC, > > but it's not needed at all since bio->bi_ops has set up properly in > > both __extent_writepage() and write_one_eb(), and in the case of > > write_one_eb(), it also sets REQ_META, which we will lose in > > flush_epd_write_bio(). > > > > This remove this unnecessary bio->bi_ops setting. > > Nitpick: it's bi_op, not bi_ops. Ah thanks, it's bio->bi_opf ;) thanks, -liubo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 11:04:40AM -0700, Liu Bo wrote: > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 07:10:41AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 12:15:09PM -0600, Liu Bo wrote: > > > flush_epd_write_bio() sets bio->bi_ops by itself to honor REQ_SYNC, > > > but it's not needed at all since bio->bi_ops has set up properly in > > > both __extent_writepage() and write_one_eb(), and in the case of > > > write_one_eb(), it also sets REQ_META, which we will lose in > > > flush_epd_write_bio(). > > > > > > This remove this unnecessary bio->bi_ops setting. > > > > Nitpick: it's bi_op, not bi_ops. > > Ah thanks, it's bio->bi_opf ;) Heh. Of course.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 12:15:09PM -0600, Liu Bo wrote: > flush_epd_write_bio() sets bio->bi_ops by itself to honor REQ_SYNC, > but it's not needed at all since bio->bi_ops has set up properly in > both __extent_writepage() and write_one_eb(), and in the case of > write_one_eb(), it also sets REQ_META, which we will lose in > flush_epd_write_bio(). > > This remove this unnecessary bio->bi_ops setting. > > Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c index b61d68f..a454a10 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c @@ -4054,9 +4054,6 @@ static void flush_epd_write_bio(struct extent_page_data *epd) if (epd->bio) { int ret; - bio_set_op_attrs(epd->bio, REQ_OP_WRITE, - epd->sync_io ? REQ_SYNC : 0); - ret = submit_one_bio(epd->bio, 0, 0); BUG_ON(ret < 0); /* -ENOMEM */ epd->bio = NULL;
flush_epd_write_bio() sets bio->bi_ops by itself to honor REQ_SYNC, but it's not needed at all since bio->bi_ops has set up properly in both __extent_writepage() and write_one_eb(), and in the case of write_one_eb(), it also sets REQ_META, which we will lose in flush_epd_write_bio(). This remove this unnecessary bio->bi_ops setting. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> --- fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)