@@ -1491,7 +1491,7 @@ int btrfs_read_dev_super(int fd, struct btrfs_super_block *sb, u64 sb_bytenr,
}
}
- return transid > 0 ? 0 : -1;
+ return transid > 0 ? 0 : -ENOENT;
}
static int write_dev_supers(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
@@ -1678,7 +1678,7 @@ int get_fs_info(const char *path, struct btrfs_ioctl_fs_info_args *fi_args,
disk_super = (struct btrfs_super_block *)buf;
ret = btrfs_read_dev_super(fd, disk_super,
BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET, 0);
- if (ret < 0) {
+ if (ret) {
ret = -EIO;
goto out;
}
@@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ int btrfs_scan_one_device(int fd, const char *path,
disk_super = (struct btrfs_super_block *)buf;
ret = btrfs_read_dev_super(fd, disk_super, super_offset, sbflags);
- if (ret < 0)
+ if (ret)
return -EIO;
devid = btrfs_stack_device_id(&disk_super->dev_item);
if (btrfs_super_flags(disk_super) & BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_METADUMP)
btrfs_read_dev_super() returns -1 / -EPERM upon not finding a suitable SB, change that to return -ENOENT instead, which is much closer to the actual possible errors. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> --- v2: use -ENOENT instead of 1. disk-io.c | 2 +- utils.c | 2 +- volumes.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)