| Message ID | 20180507085027.23059-1-lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
On 2018年05月07日 16:50, Lu Fengqi wrote: > The QGROUP_RELATION item is very special, it always exists in pairs > (objectid and offset exchange). Its objectid and offset are the ids of a > pair of parent and child qgroups, respectively. The larger one is > parent and the smaller one is child. After the following commit, the order > of the parameters is wrong and causes qgroup show to output the wrong > qgroup parent-child relationship. > > Fixes: aaf2dac5ef37 ("btrfs-progs: qgroup: split update_qgroup to reduce arguments") > Issue: #129 > Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> > --- > qgroup.c | 9 +++++++-- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/qgroup.c b/qgroup.c > index 11659e8394dd..e7e127daf5ce 100644 > --- a/qgroup.c > +++ b/qgroup.c > @@ -1122,11 +1122,16 @@ static int __qgroups_search(int fd, struct qgroup_lookup *qgroup_lookup) > qgroupid = btrfs_search_header_offset(sh); > qgroupid1 = btrfs_search_header_objectid(sh); > > - if (qgroupid < qgroupid1) > + if (qgroupid <= qgroupid1) > break; > > + /* > + * because of qgroupid > qgroupid1, qgroupid is > + * the id of parent, and qgroupid1 is the id of > + * child. > + */ Instead of such comment, renaming @qgroupid to @parent, and @qgroupid1 to @child makes more sense. And a test case would definitely help in this case. Thanks, Qu > ret = update_qgroup_relation(qgroup_lookup, > - qgroupid, qgroupid1); > + qgroupid1, qgroupid); > break; > default: > return ret; >
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 07:19:32PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: > > >On 2018年05月07日 16:50, Lu Fengqi wrote: >> The QGROUP_RELATION item is very special, it always exists in pairs >> (objectid and offset exchange). Its objectid and offset are the ids of a >> pair of parent and child qgroups, respectively. The larger one is >> parent and the smaller one is child. After the following commit, the order >> of the parameters is wrong and causes qgroup show to output the wrong >> qgroup parent-child relationship. >> >> Fixes: aaf2dac5ef37 ("btrfs-progs: qgroup: split update_qgroup to reduce arguments") >> Issue: #129 >> Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> >> --- >> qgroup.c | 9 +++++++-- >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/qgroup.c b/qgroup.c >> index 11659e8394dd..e7e127daf5ce 100644 >> --- a/qgroup.c >> +++ b/qgroup.c >> @@ -1122,11 +1122,16 @@ static int __qgroups_search(int fd, struct qgroup_lookup *qgroup_lookup) >> qgroupid = btrfs_search_header_offset(sh); >> qgroupid1 = btrfs_search_header_objectid(sh); >> >> - if (qgroupid < qgroupid1) >> + if (qgroupid <= qgroupid1) >> break; >> >> + /* >> + * because of qgroupid > qgroupid1, qgroupid is >> + * the id of parent, and qgroupid1 is the id of >> + * child. >> + */ > >Instead of such comment, renaming @qgroupid to @parent, and @qgroupid1 >to @child makes more sense. Although we are not sure which one is the parent before this if statement, renaming may indeed make the code clearer, so V2 is coming. > >And a test case would definitely help in this case. Make sense.
diff --git a/qgroup.c b/qgroup.c index 11659e8394dd..e7e127daf5ce 100644 --- a/qgroup.c +++ b/qgroup.c @@ -1122,11 +1122,16 @@ static int __qgroups_search(int fd, struct qgroup_lookup *qgroup_lookup) qgroupid = btrfs_search_header_offset(sh); qgroupid1 = btrfs_search_header_objectid(sh); - if (qgroupid < qgroupid1) + if (qgroupid <= qgroupid1) break; + /* + * because of qgroupid > qgroupid1, qgroupid is + * the id of parent, and qgroupid1 is the id of + * child. + */ ret = update_qgroup_relation(qgroup_lookup, - qgroupid, qgroupid1); + qgroupid1, qgroupid); break; default: return ret;
The QGROUP_RELATION item is very special, it always exists in pairs (objectid and offset exchange). Its objectid and offset are the ids of a pair of parent and child qgroups, respectively. The larger one is parent and the smaller one is child. After the following commit, the order of the parameters is wrong and causes qgroup show to output the wrong qgroup parent-child relationship. Fixes: aaf2dac5ef37 ("btrfs-progs: qgroup: split update_qgroup to reduce arguments") Issue: #129 Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> --- qgroup.c | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)