| Message ID | 20180703090724.22023-1-anand.jain@oracle.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index 8b34af7c217c..b5a60ab37a1c 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -2027,6 +2027,9 @@ int btrfs_rm_device(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, const char *device_path, cur_devices->num_devices--; cur_devices->total_devices--; + /* Update total_devices for the parent fs_devices if its seed */ + if (cur_devices != fs_devices) + fs_devices->total_devices--; if (test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_MISSING, &device->dev_state)) cur_devices->missing_devices--;
In case of deleting the seed device the %cur_devices (seed) and the %fs_devices (parent) are different. Now, as the parent fs_devices::total_devices also maintains the total number of devices including the seed device, so decrement its in-memory value for the successful seed delete. We are already updating its corresponding on-disk btrfs_super_block::number_devices value. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> --- v1->v2: no change fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)