Message ID | 20200911123259.3782926-13-naohiro.aota@wdc.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show
Return-Path: <SRS0=ZNpj=CU=vger.kernel.org=linux-btrfs-owner@kernel.org> Received: from mail.kernel.org (pdx-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.123]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AFF813B1 for <patchwork-linux-btrfs@patchwork.kernel.org>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 17:44:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35383221EB for <patchwork-linux-btrfs@patchwork.kernel.org>; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 17:44:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=wdc.com header.i=@wdc.com header.b="bax7xpX+" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726231AbgIKRoN (ORCPT <rfc822;patchwork-linux-btrfs@patchwork.kernel.org>); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 13:44:13 -0400 Received: from esa5.hgst.iphmx.com ([216.71.153.144]:38451 "EHLO esa5.hgst.iphmx.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725936AbgIKMfZ (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 11 Sep 2020 08:35:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=wdc.com; i=@wdc.com; q=dns/txt; s=dkim.wdc.com; t=1599827725; x=1631363725; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yH1nPkHODBV09kOOFiPhVkyCkpApdtePV0TSia5UdZM=; b=bax7xpX+CPwLujyCVoLBSQUVsbXGTKCROhweLqSrKCN+e8/aMvgsgKhd B5Avq1u8rvoHJn3vUaxvj9yYCdYSaVIdM+/yz0lHFOx2Bi8Y4+s8FwqhB BsL08YjQVvoTrydJfQ+7eGuQWexd2Pl/z/KLSWTpMVLk1hbNsnew2ggfi BcwveP8Br7QzrTOchFbgGyOJtm4G3RidwRKo0WBSgjtWw3t7KDUUSQh8p LA/N4Frd2ZvpkVw+LRk/xTh1fXh4rEsyYNRoY36ujvD9VsJP97k3VVo7X 3MraYotJg/KVytn1r9INOC9PTOGwnDMe+M+84PpWdhb7Qehoa9G7ZhNka w==; IronPort-SDR: qlHqBj7B8XODFqkTsvT84Dq3ggcX4CLo/6vXZF7lgNmD2uavcgmojzn5ckQqniHoyd+TQ5LkJZ 8uPURxQMc+Bm/vfk423FEEa9NZgwtJbalKPjjy44G4rhxSyGYzHiTXZeJSrvaa26l9c4u+kb+e 28denc4aj63XJWC7T92NsIBB88hM/Pg6KCj1pRjqSD6g2XSitHBnqbkAPqawyNO3XX8JSpTPcx 9Y9QaBhTwOWuThEpKNHqva5pyNBkv2vW9VNkr/L4r66YZBsD5Zn0MlspgbEZCbJx1tGe5CQikT IOA= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,415,1592841600"; d="scan'208";a="147125978" Received: from h199-255-45-15.hgst.com (HELO uls-op-cesaep02.wdc.com) ([199.255.45.15]) by ob1.hgst.iphmx.com with ESMTP; 11 Sep 2020 20:33:25 +0800 IronPort-SDR: RhBzNfws+h5iMTWzZ863TTbrL9jP86jXKoyWkGc0feJh6ZI6o32Nr0QpFPM1XmUvO+y+NTlHda Dn6CmQLR51ig== Received: from uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com ([10.248.3.37]) by uls-op-cesaep02.wdc.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Sep 2020 05:19:46 -0700 IronPort-SDR: ZkLh3ZvYdikujK0xzO9wN3MUnwFs5hSDAQFDer1MfztJfgIOYZQmiEd7ST71VdKvu3rjDB9Khp e8vybWwigQEQ== WDCIronportException: Internal Received: from naota.dhcp.fujisawa.hgst.com ([10.149.52.155]) by uls-op-cesaip02.wdc.com with ESMTP; 11 Sep 2020 05:33:23 -0700 From: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Subject: [PATCH v7 12/39] btrfs: verify device extent is aligned to zone Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 21:32:32 +0900 Message-Id: <20200911123259.3782926-13-naohiro.aota@wdc.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.27.0 In-Reply-To: <20200911123259.3782926-1-naohiro.aota@wdc.com> References: <20200911123259.3782926-1-naohiro.aota@wdc.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org |
Series |
btrfs: zoned block device support
|
expand
|
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index 8c439d1ae4c5..086cd308e5b6 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -7765,6 +7765,20 @@ static int verify_one_dev_extent(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, ret = -EUCLEAN; goto out; } + + if (dev->zone_info) { + u64 zone_size = dev->zone_info->zone_size; + + if (!IS_ALIGNED(physical_offset, zone_size) || + !IS_ALIGNED(physical_len, zone_size)) { + btrfs_err(fs_info, +"dev extent devid %llu physical offset %llu len %llu is not aligned to device zone", + devid, physical_offset, physical_len); + ret = -EUCLEAN; + goto out; + } + } + out: free_extent_map(em); return ret;
This patch add a verification in verify_one_dev_extent() to check if the device extent is aligned to zone boundary. Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)