diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c index 37c721294ffe..6f41371290e2 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c @@ -5298,6 +5298,13 @@ struct extent_buffer *alloc_extent_buffer(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, btrfs_err(fs_info, "bad tree block start %llu", start); return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); } + if (btrfs_is_subpage(fs_info) && round_down(start, PAGE_SIZE) != + round_down(start + len - 1, PAGE_SIZE)) { + btrfs_err(fs_info, + "tree block crosses page boundary, start %llu nodesize %lu", + start, len); + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); + } eb = find_extent_buffer(fs_info, start); if (eb)
As a preparation for subpage sector size support (allowing filesystem with sector size smaller than page size to be mounted) if the sector size is smaller than page size, we don't allow tree block to be read if it crosses 64K(*) boundary. The 64K is selected because: - We are only going to support 64K page size for subpage for now - 64K is also the max node size btrfs supports This ensures that, tree blocks are always contained in one page for a system with 64K page size, which can greatly simplify the handling. Or we need to do complex multi-page handling for tree blocks. Currently the only way to create such tree blocks crossing 64K boundary is by btrfs-convert, which will get fixed soon and doesn't get wide-spread usage. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> --- fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)