diff mbox series

[v2,02/14] btrfs: Fix parameter description of btrfs_add_extent_mapping

Message ID 20210120102526.310486-3-nborisov@suse.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series Make btrfs W=1 clean | expand

Commit Message

Nikolay Borisov Jan. 20, 2021, 10:25 a.m. UTC
This fixes the following compiler warnings:

fs/btrfs/extent_map.c:601: warning: Function parameter or member 'fs_info' not described in 'btrfs_add_extent_mapping'
fs/btrfs/extent_map.c:601: warning: Function parameter or member 'em_tree' not described in 'btrfs_add_extent_mapping'
fs/btrfs/extent_map.c:601: warning: Function parameter or member 'em_in' not described in 'btrfs_add_extent_mapping'
fs/btrfs/extent_map.c:601: warning: Function parameter or member 'start' not described in 'btrfs_add_extent_mapping'
fs/btrfs/extent_map.c:601: warning: Function parameter or member 'len' not described in 'btrfs_add_extent_mapping'

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/extent_map.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c
index aa1ff6f2ade9..90ae3c31e7fb 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c
@@ -577,11 +577,11 @@  static noinline int merge_extent_mapping(struct extent_map_tree *em_tree,
 
 /**
  * btrfs_add_extent_mapping - add extent mapping into em_tree
- * @fs_info - used for tracepoint
- * @em_tree - the extent tree into which we want to insert the extent mapping
- * @em_in   - extent we are inserting
- * @start   - start of the logical range btrfs_get_extent() is requesting
- * @len     - length of the logical range btrfs_get_extent() is requesting
+ * @fs_info:  used for tracepoint
+ * @em_tree:  the extent tree into which we want to insert the extent mapping
+ * @em_in:   extent we are inserting
+ * @start:    start of the logical range btrfs_get_extent() is requesting
+ * @len:      length of the logical range btrfs_get_extent() is requesting
  *
  * Note that @em_in's range may be different from [start, start+len),
  * but they must be overlapped.