Message ID | 20210222131749.dxkq45umwehqm33i@fiona (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | btrfs: Remove force argument from run_delalloc_nocow() | expand |
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 07:17:49AM -0600, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: > force_nocow can be calculated by btrfs_inode and does not need to be > passed as an argument. > > This simplifies run_delalloc_nocow() call from btrfs_run_delalloc_range() > where should_nocow() checks for BTRFS_INODE_NODATASUM and > BTRFS_INODE_PREALLOC flags or if EXTENT_DEFRAG flags are set. > > should_nocow() has been re-arranged so EXTENT_DEFRAG has higher priority > in checks. Why is that? In the check sequence, test_range_bit is called first but that's more expensive as it needs to iterate the range. > Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com> > --- > fs/btrfs/inode.c | 28 +++++++++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c > index 4f2f1e932751..2115d8cc6f18 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c > @@ -1516,7 +1516,7 @@ static int fallback_to_cow(struct btrfs_inode *inode, struct page *locked_page, > static noinline int run_delalloc_nocow(struct btrfs_inode *inode, > struct page *locked_page, > const u64 start, const u64 end, > - int *page_started, int force, > + int *page_started, > unsigned long *nr_written) > { > struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = inode->root->fs_info; > @@ -1530,6 +1530,7 @@ static noinline int run_delalloc_nocow(struct btrfs_inode *inode, > u64 ino = btrfs_ino(inode); > bool nocow = false; > u64 disk_bytenr = 0; > + bool force = inode->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW; > > path = btrfs_alloc_path(); > if (!path) { > @@ -1863,13 +1864,9 @@ static noinline int run_delalloc_nocow(struct btrfs_inode *inode, > return ret; > } > > -static inline int need_force_cow(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 start, u64 end) > +static inline bool should_nocow(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 start, u64 end) > { > > - if (!(inode->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW) && > - !(inode->flags & BTRFS_INODE_PREALLOC)) > - return 0; > - > /* > * @defrag_bytes is a hint value, no spinlock held here, > * if is not zero, it means the file is defragging. > @@ -1877,9 +1874,15 @@ static inline int need_force_cow(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 start, u64 end) > */ > if (inode->defrag_bytes && > test_range_bit(&inode->io_tree, start, end, EXTENT_DEFRAG, 0, NULL)) > - return 1; > + return false; > > - return 0; > + if (inode->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW) > + return true; > + > + if (inode->flags & BTRFS_INODE_PREALLOC) > + return true; So here it needs to do test_range_bit first, while before the two checks were fast path. > + > + return false; > } > > /* > @@ -1891,17 +1894,12 @@ int btrfs_run_delalloc_range(struct btrfs_inode *inode, struct page *locked_page > struct writeback_control *wbc) > { > int ret; > - int force_cow = need_force_cow(inode, start, end); > const bool zoned = btrfs_is_zoned(inode->root->fs_info); > > - if (inode->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW && !force_cow) { > - ASSERT(!zoned); > - ret = run_delalloc_nocow(inode, locked_page, start, end, > - page_started, 1, nr_written); > - } else if (inode->flags & BTRFS_INODE_PREALLOC && !force_cow) { > + if (should_nocow(inode, start, end)) { > ASSERT(!zoned); > ret = run_delalloc_nocow(inode, locked_page, start, end, > - page_started, 0, nr_written); > + page_started, nr_written); Merging the two calls into one branch makes sense so that all the reasons for 'nocow' are in one helper, so ok. > } else if (!inode_can_compress(inode) || > !inode_need_compress(inode, start, end)) { > if (zoned) > -- > 2.30.1
On 19:56 24/02, David Sterba wrote: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 07:17:49AM -0600, Goldwyn Rodrigues wrote: > > force_nocow can be calculated by btrfs_inode and does not need to be > > passed as an argument. > > > > This simplifies run_delalloc_nocow() call from btrfs_run_delalloc_range() > > where should_nocow() checks for BTRFS_INODE_NODATASUM and > > BTRFS_INODE_PREALLOC flags or if EXTENT_DEFRAG flags are set. > > > > should_nocow() has been re-arranged so EXTENT_DEFRAG has higher priority > > in checks. > > Why is that? In the check sequence, test_range_bit is called first but > that's more expensive as it needs to iterate the range. The test_range() is conditional and short-circuited by inode->defrag_bytes. So, the worst case scenario would be when defrag_bytes > 0, and EXTENT_DEFRAG is not set for the range. I did it for readability, but if you think need_force_cow() is faster, I am fine with keeping it. > > > Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com> > > --- > > fs/btrfs/inode.c | 28 +++++++++++++--------------- > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c > > index 4f2f1e932751..2115d8cc6f18 100644 > > --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c > > +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c > > @@ -1516,7 +1516,7 @@ static int fallback_to_cow(struct btrfs_inode *inode, struct page *locked_page, > > static noinline int run_delalloc_nocow(struct btrfs_inode *inode, > > struct page *locked_page, > > const u64 start, const u64 end, > > - int *page_started, int force, > > + int *page_started, > > unsigned long *nr_written) > > { > > struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = inode->root->fs_info; > > @@ -1530,6 +1530,7 @@ static noinline int run_delalloc_nocow(struct btrfs_inode *inode, > > u64 ino = btrfs_ino(inode); > > bool nocow = false; > > u64 disk_bytenr = 0; > > + bool force = inode->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW; > > > > path = btrfs_alloc_path(); > > if (!path) { > > @@ -1863,13 +1864,9 @@ static noinline int run_delalloc_nocow(struct btrfs_inode *inode, > > return ret; > > } > > > > -static inline int need_force_cow(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 start, u64 end) > > +static inline bool should_nocow(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 start, u64 end) > > { > > > > - if (!(inode->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW) && > > - !(inode->flags & BTRFS_INODE_PREALLOC)) > > - return 0; > > - > > /* > > * @defrag_bytes is a hint value, no spinlock held here, > > * if is not zero, it means the file is defragging. > > @@ -1877,9 +1874,15 @@ static inline int need_force_cow(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 start, u64 end) > > */ > > if (inode->defrag_bytes && > > test_range_bit(&inode->io_tree, start, end, EXTENT_DEFRAG, 0, NULL)) > > - return 1; > > + return false; > > > > - return 0; > > + if (inode->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW) > > + return true; > > + > > + if (inode->flags & BTRFS_INODE_PREALLOC) > > + return true; > > So here it needs to do test_range_bit first, while before the two checks > were fast path. > > > + > > + return false; > > } > > > > /* > > @@ -1891,17 +1894,12 @@ int btrfs_run_delalloc_range(struct btrfs_inode *inode, struct page *locked_page > > struct writeback_control *wbc) > > { > > int ret; > > - int force_cow = need_force_cow(inode, start, end); > > const bool zoned = btrfs_is_zoned(inode->root->fs_info); > > > > - if (inode->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW && !force_cow) { > > - ASSERT(!zoned); > > - ret = run_delalloc_nocow(inode, locked_page, start, end, > > - page_started, 1, nr_written); > > - } else if (inode->flags & BTRFS_INODE_PREALLOC && !force_cow) { > > + if (should_nocow(inode, start, end)) { > > ASSERT(!zoned); > > ret = run_delalloc_nocow(inode, locked_page, start, end, > > - page_started, 0, nr_written); > > + page_started, nr_written); > > Merging the two calls into one branch makes sense so that all the > reasons for 'nocow' are in one helper, so ok. > > > } else if (!inode_can_compress(inode) || > > !inode_need_compress(inode, start, end)) { > > if (zoned) > > -- > > 2.30.1
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 4f2f1e932751..2115d8cc6f18 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -1516,7 +1516,7 @@ static int fallback_to_cow(struct btrfs_inode *inode, struct page *locked_page, static noinline int run_delalloc_nocow(struct btrfs_inode *inode, struct page *locked_page, const u64 start, const u64 end, - int *page_started, int force, + int *page_started, unsigned long *nr_written) { struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = inode->root->fs_info; @@ -1530,6 +1530,7 @@ static noinline int run_delalloc_nocow(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 ino = btrfs_ino(inode); bool nocow = false; u64 disk_bytenr = 0; + bool force = inode->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW; path = btrfs_alloc_path(); if (!path) { @@ -1863,13 +1864,9 @@ static noinline int run_delalloc_nocow(struct btrfs_inode *inode, return ret; } -static inline int need_force_cow(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 start, u64 end) +static inline bool should_nocow(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 start, u64 end) { - if (!(inode->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW) && - !(inode->flags & BTRFS_INODE_PREALLOC)) - return 0; - /* * @defrag_bytes is a hint value, no spinlock held here, * if is not zero, it means the file is defragging. @@ -1877,9 +1874,15 @@ static inline int need_force_cow(struct btrfs_inode *inode, u64 start, u64 end) */ if (inode->defrag_bytes && test_range_bit(&inode->io_tree, start, end, EXTENT_DEFRAG, 0, NULL)) - return 1; + return false; - return 0; + if (inode->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW) + return true; + + if (inode->flags & BTRFS_INODE_PREALLOC) + return true; + + return false; } /* @@ -1891,17 +1894,12 @@ int btrfs_run_delalloc_range(struct btrfs_inode *inode, struct page *locked_page struct writeback_control *wbc) { int ret; - int force_cow = need_force_cow(inode, start, end); const bool zoned = btrfs_is_zoned(inode->root->fs_info); - if (inode->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATACOW && !force_cow) { - ASSERT(!zoned); - ret = run_delalloc_nocow(inode, locked_page, start, end, - page_started, 1, nr_written); - } else if (inode->flags & BTRFS_INODE_PREALLOC && !force_cow) { + if (should_nocow(inode, start, end)) { ASSERT(!zoned); ret = run_delalloc_nocow(inode, locked_page, start, end, - page_started, 0, nr_written); + page_started, nr_written); } else if (!inode_can_compress(inode) || !inode_need_compress(inode, start, end)) { if (zoned)
force_nocow can be calculated by btrfs_inode and does not need to be passed as an argument. This simplifies run_delalloc_nocow() call from btrfs_run_delalloc_range() where should_nocow() checks for BTRFS_INODE_NODATASUM and BTRFS_INODE_PREALLOC flags or if EXTENT_DEFRAG flags are set. should_nocow() has been re-arranged so EXTENT_DEFRAG has higher priority in checks. Signed-off-by: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com> --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 28 +++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)