Message ID | 20210321113342.GA3319@realwakka (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | Simple question for comment in btrfs-progs qgroup code | expand |
On 2021/3/21 下午7:33, Sidong Yang wrote: > Hello! > > I see an comment in qgroup cmds below. > > diff --git a/cmds/qgroup.c b/cmds/qgroup.c > index 2da83ffd..a71089e9 100644 > --- a/cmds/qgroup.c > +++ b/cmds/qgroup.c > @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ static int _cmd_qgroup_assign(const struct cmd_struct > *cmd, int assign, > /* > * FIXME src should accept subvol path > */ > > This comment is little confusing for me. src was parsed with > parse_qgroupid() and it also accepts subvol path. is it outdated > comment? or src should accept only lowest level of qgroup? It's outdated and confusing. For the assign ioctl, it only accepts 3 u64 parameters, assign:bool to indicate if it's adding or deleting qgroup relationship. src/dst to specify the qgroupid (u64). There is no room for path at all. The qgroupid resolve is done completely in user space. Feel free to delete the comment. > > Thanks, > Sidong >
diff --git a/cmds/qgroup.c b/cmds/qgroup.c index 2da83ffd..a71089e9 100644 --- a/cmds/qgroup.c +++ b/cmds/qgroup.c @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ static int _cmd_qgroup_assign(const struct cmd_struct *cmd, int assign, /* * FIXME src should accept subvol path */ This comment is little confusing for me. src was parsed with parse_qgroupid() and it also accepts subvol path. is it outdated