diff mbox series

[-next] btrfs: integrity-checker: use DEFINE_MUTEX() for mutex lock

Message ID 20210405101446.14990-1-zhengyongjun3@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [-next] btrfs: integrity-checker: use DEFINE_MUTEX() for mutex lock | expand

Commit Message

Zheng Yongjun April 5, 2021, 10:14 a.m. UTC
mutex lock can be initialized automatically with DEFINE_MUTEX()
rather than explicitly calling mutex_init().

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@huawei.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

David Sterba April 6, 2021, 12:16 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Apr 05, 2021 at 06:14:46PM +0800, Zheng Yongjun wrote:
> mutex lock can be initialized automatically with DEFINE_MUTEX()
> rather than explicitly calling mutex_init().
> 
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@huawei.com>

You've sent this patch already and haven't provided the answer why the
changes should be done.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20210104144559.GF6430@twin.jikos.cz/
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c b/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c
index 169508609324..7af9273ef1b6 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/check-integrity.c
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@  static void btrfsic_cmp_log_and_dev_bytenr(struct btrfsic_state *state,
 					   struct btrfsic_dev_state *dev_state,
 					   u64 dev_bytenr);
 
-static struct mutex btrfsic_mutex;
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(btrfsic_mutex);
 static int btrfsic_is_initialized;
 static struct btrfsic_dev_state_hashtable btrfsic_dev_state_hashtable;
 
@@ -2787,7 +2787,6 @@  int btrfsic_mount(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	if (!btrfsic_is_initialized) {
-		mutex_init(&btrfsic_mutex);
 		btrfsic_dev_state_hashtable_init(&btrfsic_dev_state_hashtable);
 		btrfsic_is_initialized = 1;
 	}