Message ID | 20210629095333.115111-1-lijian_8010a29@163.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | fs: ntfs: super: added return error value while map failed | expand |
Wrong subject, it's not ntfs. On 2021/6/29 下午5:53, lijian_8010a29@163.com wrote: > From: lijian <lijian@yulong.com> Still, you guys should try to send from your yulong.com mail box, not 163. > > When lookup_extent_mapping failed, should return '-ENOENT'. > > Signed-off-by: lijian <lijian@yulong.com> Some maintainer is OK with name like all lower letters, but at least to my eyes, Li Jian <lijian@yulong.com> is much easier to read. Thanks, Qu > --- > fs/btrfs/extent_map.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c > index 4a8e02f7b6c7..e9d9f2bfc11d 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c > @@ -305,8 +305,10 @@ int unpin_extent_cache(struct extent_map_tree *tree, u64 start, u64 len, > > WARN_ON(!em || em->start != start); > > - if (!em) > + if (!em) { > + ret = -ENOENT; > goto out; > + } > > em->generation = gen; > clear_bit(EXTENT_FLAG_PINNED, &em->flags); >
On 29/06/2021 12:41, lijian_8010a29@163.com wrote: > From: lijian <lijian@yulong.com> > > When lookup_extent_mapping failed, should return '-ENOENT'. > > Signed-off-by: lijian <lijian@yulong.com> > --- > fs/btrfs/extent_map.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c > index 4a8e02f7b6c7..e9d9f2bfc11d 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c > @@ -305,8 +305,10 @@ int unpin_extent_cache(struct extent_map_tree *tree, u64 start, u64 len, > > WARN_ON(!em || em->start != start); > > - if (!em) > + if (!em) { > + ret = -ENOENT; > goto out; > + } > > em->generation = gen; > clear_bit(EXTENT_FLAG_PINNED, &em->flags); > You'll still need to properly handle the returned error in the caller, otherwise this patch makes no sense at all. Also the subject should be something like "btrfs: handle failures from unpin_extent_cache" or sth. like this.
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c index 4a8e02f7b6c7..e9d9f2bfc11d 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_map.c @@ -305,8 +305,10 @@ int unpin_extent_cache(struct extent_map_tree *tree, u64 start, u64 len, WARN_ON(!em || em->start != start); - if (!em) + if (!em) { + ret = -ENOENT; goto out; + } em->generation = gen; clear_bit(EXTENT_FLAG_PINNED, &em->flags);