From patchwork Sat Aug 17 12:21:27 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Qu Wenruo X-Patchwork-Id: 13767179 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FA787DA97 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2024 12:21:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.135.223.130 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723897314; cv=none; b=ZXCOsjUBai6drVrwL0PfhQun9v8RDCoiXWruBjZI2ITWPJQwM3x8i5Ojd4WUuFr8gaHrXB0ZZ3xjexL7o0LrEoNQVuRn06Z+IezF9ZfZGs4hraQMaTle5ZSResBf9Gbr2Zinm+iwJ2S4X84B7/LIuYZa9IXmp9eKKvJNFn0whfI= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723897314; c=relaxed/simple; bh=az/ZuY+I96r0ZELenEvN8sRIOUuVRMFQKLW5U1oeC9c=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=lj02baa4GOBYd5ZwXFuNg5IwFokXKRJedzVHU9Mei3RhMi3/LHl5Td2aAzVUluAqGacV/P7q/Cd8F4hK0xiayO+tJyUQjr9CjxC56BxJIWW5WXf2KXWylKdlNATHfptGG9jh7gLceH+KssDD31VYKdyCJQUmAbq/oCKislVn9Sw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b=Be00bQJh; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b=Be00bQJh; arc=none smtp.client-ip=195.135.223.130 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="Be00bQJh"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.com header.i=@suse.com header.b="Be00bQJh" Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86DCE21FF7; Sat, 17 Aug 2024 12:21:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1723897310; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KpErxIPCFErSZ6WcqDp2kRUihkFpLdNFnJR5EAaDCHo=; b=Be00bQJhzASoBNq9JB4BRfoGH79CdHJjCJNUZCriqpK38hOxwGskVel1M75P4c9qga9qYr EEsC3D1ES1RrKJKRbIZsMI4OY/F9flfPv43wMkRSAIHtsuxZBXpgWzcVlhzwIjcaow1X1y Vytv2K68qv7ZmxVl0EQVbKwE+uydAUs= Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1723897310; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KpErxIPCFErSZ6WcqDp2kRUihkFpLdNFnJR5EAaDCHo=; b=Be00bQJhzASoBNq9JB4BRfoGH79CdHJjCJNUZCriqpK38hOxwGskVel1M75P4c9qga9qYr EEsC3D1ES1RrKJKRbIZsMI4OY/F9flfPv43wMkRSAIHtsuxZBXpgWzcVlhzwIjcaow1X1y Vytv2K68qv7ZmxVl0EQVbKwE+uydAUs= Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 657471397F; Sat, 17 Aug 2024 12:21:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id xXQHCN2VwGYIPQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Sat, 17 Aug 2024 12:21:49 +0000 From: Qu Wenruo To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: David Sterba Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: fix a use-after-free bug when hitting errors inside btrfs_submit_chunk() Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2024 21:51:27 +0930 Message-ID: <25987ba63d6e11a6983bf2c57eb2ac8efe059d8e.1723897285.git.wqu@suse.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.46.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.80 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_MISSING_CHARSET(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.com:s=susede1]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.com:mid,suse.com:email,suse.cz:email,opensuse.org:url,imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo] X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Score: -2.80 [BUG] There is an internal report that KASAN is reporting use-after-free, with the following backtrace: ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in btrfs_check_read_bio+0xa68/0xb70 [btrfs] Read of size 4 at addr ffff8881117cec28 by task kworker/u16:2/45 CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 45 Comm: kworker/u16:2 Not tainted 6.11.0-rc2-next-20240805-default+ #76 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-3-gd478f380-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: btrfs-endio btrfs_end_bio_work [btrfs] Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x61/0x80 print_address_description.constprop.0+0x5e/0x2f0 print_report+0x118/0x216 kasan_report+0x11d/0x1f0 btrfs_check_read_bio+0xa68/0xb70 [btrfs] process_one_work+0xce0/0x12a0 worker_thread+0x717/0x1250 kthread+0x2e3/0x3c0 ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x70 ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 Allocated by task 20917: kasan_save_stack+0x37/0x60 kasan_save_track+0x10/0x30 __kasan_slab_alloc+0x7d/0x80 kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x16e/0x3e0 mempool_alloc_noprof+0x12e/0x310 bio_alloc_bioset+0x3f0/0x7a0 btrfs_bio_alloc+0x2e/0x50 [btrfs] submit_extent_page+0x4d1/0xdb0 [btrfs] btrfs_do_readpage+0x8b4/0x12a0 [btrfs] btrfs_readahead+0x29a/0x430 [btrfs] read_pages+0x1a7/0xc60 page_cache_ra_unbounded+0x2ad/0x560 filemap_get_pages+0x629/0xa20 filemap_read+0x335/0xbf0 vfs_read+0x790/0xcb0 ksys_read+0xfd/0x1d0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 Freed by task 20917: kasan_save_stack+0x37/0x60 kasan_save_track+0x10/0x30 kasan_save_free_info+0x37/0x50 __kasan_slab_free+0x4b/0x60 kmem_cache_free+0x214/0x5d0 bio_free+0xed/0x180 end_bbio_data_read+0x1cc/0x580 [btrfs] btrfs_submit_chunk+0x98d/0x1880 [btrfs] btrfs_submit_bio+0x33/0x70 [btrfs] submit_one_bio+0xd4/0x130 [btrfs] submit_extent_page+0x3ea/0xdb0 [btrfs] btrfs_do_readpage+0x8b4/0x12a0 [btrfs] btrfs_readahead+0x29a/0x430 [btrfs] read_pages+0x1a7/0xc60 page_cache_ra_unbounded+0x2ad/0x560 filemap_get_pages+0x629/0xa20 filemap_read+0x335/0xbf0 vfs_read+0x790/0xcb0 ksys_read+0xfd/0x1d0 do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x140 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 [CAUSE] Although I can not reproduce the error, the report itself is good enough to pin down the cause. The call trace is the regular endio workqueue context, but the free-by-task trace is showing that during btrfs_submit_chunk() we already hit a critical error, and is calling btrfs_bio_end_io() to error out. And the original endio function called bio_put() to free the whole bio. This means a double freeing thus causing use-after-free, e.g: 1. Enter btrfs_submit_bio() with a read bio The read bio length is 128K, crossing two 64K stripes. 2. The first run of btrfs_submit_chunk() 2.1 Call btrfs_map_block(), which returns 64K 2.2 Call btrfs_split_bio() Now there are two bios, one referring to the first 64K, the other referring to the second 64K. 2.3 The first half is submitted. 3. The second run of btrfs_submit_chunk() 3.1 Call btrfs_map_block(), which by somehow failed Now we call btrfs_bio_end_io() to handle the error 3.2 btrfs_bio_end_io() calls the original endio function Which is end_bbio_data_read(), and it calls bio_put() for the original bio. Now the original bio is freed. 4. The submitted first 64K bio finished Now we call into btrfs_check_read_bio() and tries to advance the bio iter. But since the original bio (thus its iter) is already freed, we trigger the above use-after free. And even if the memory is not poisoned/corrupted, we will later call the original endio function, causing a double freeing. [FIX] Instead of calling btrfs_bio_end_io(), call btrfs_orig_bbio_end_io(), which has the extra check on split bios and do the proper refcounting for cloned bios. Reported-by: David Sterba Fixes: 852eee62d31a ("btrfs: allow btrfs_submit_bio to split bios") Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo --- fs/btrfs/bio.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/bio.c b/fs/btrfs/bio.c index 0ef70fce85ff..4a0e97a56475 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/bio.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/bio.c @@ -762,7 +762,8 @@ static bool btrfs_submit_chunk(struct btrfs_bio *bbio, int mirror_num) btrfs_cleanup_bio(bbio); fail: btrfs_bio_counter_dec(fs_info); - btrfs_bio_end_io(orig_bbio, ret); + bbio->bio.bi_status = ret; + btrfs_orig_bbio_end_io(bbio); /* Do not submit another chunk */ return true; }