Message ID | 4FFB9193.6040306@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 08:21:07PM -0600, Li Zefan wrote: > Inodes always allocate free space with BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA type, > which means every inode has the same BTRFS_I(inode)->free_space pointer. > > This shrinks struct btrfs_inode by 4 bytes (or 8 bytes on 64 bits). > > Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com> Li I can't apply any of your patches because they are all in base64 format and I'm having a hell of a time pulling them out to apply them, can you resend with git send-email or something so I can apply them properly? Thanks, Josef -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 2012/7/11 3:29, Josef Bacik wrote: > On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 08:21:07PM -0600, Li Zefan wrote: >> Inodes always allocate free space with BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA type, >> which means every inode has the same BTRFS_I(inode)->free_space pointer. >> >> This shrinks struct btrfs_inode by 4 bytes (or 8 bytes on 64 bits). >> >> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com> > > Li I can't apply any of your patches because they are all in base64 format and > I'm having a hell of a time pulling them out to apply them, can you resend with > git send-email or something so I can apply them properly? Thanks, > Hmm.. I got no complaints from Tejun or Chris before, so I didn't realize all the emails I sent were in base64. It should be the email server that encoded my patches, so I don't think using git-send-email will make any difference. (not to mention I failed to make git-send-email work in my office :( Is it ok if I attach the patches in attachments? Otherwise I'll use gmail instead when I'm at home. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 07:38:11PM -0600, Li Zefan wrote: > On 2012/7/11 3:29, Josef Bacik wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 08:21:07PM -0600, Li Zefan wrote: > >> Inodes always allocate free space with BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA type, > >> which means every inode has the same BTRFS_I(inode)->free_space pointer. > >> > >> This shrinks struct btrfs_inode by 4 bytes (or 8 bytes on 64 bits). > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com> > > > > Li I can't apply any of your patches because they are all in base64 format and > > I'm having a hell of a time pulling them out to apply them, can you resend with > > git send-email or something so I can apply them properly? Thanks, > > > > > Hmm.. I got no complaints from Tejun or Chris before, so I didn't realize all > the emails I sent were in base64. It should be the email server that encoded > my patches, so I don't think using git-send-email will make any difference. > (not to mention I failed to make git-send-email work in my office :( > > Is it ok if I attach the patches in attachments? Otherwise I'll use gmail > instead when I'm at home. > Sorry I'll just pull them out somewhere else, for some reason notmuch doesn't want to decode them properly so I just get garbage. I'll just pull it out of thunderbird by hand, hopefully that will work properly. Thanks, Josef -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h b/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h index 12394a9..0b18b74 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h +++ b/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h @@ -87,9 +87,6 @@ struct btrfs_inode { /* node for the red-black tree that links inodes in subvolume root */ struct rb_node rb_node; - /* the space_info for where this inode's data allocations are done */ - struct btrfs_space_info *space_info; - unsigned long runtime_flags; /* full 64 bit generation number, struct vfs_inode doesn't have a big diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h index fa5c45b..6761490 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h @@ -1240,6 +1240,8 @@ struct btrfs_fs_info { */ struct list_head space_info; + struct btrfs_space_info *data_sinfo; + struct reloc_control *reloc_ctl; spinlock_t delalloc_lock; @@ -2607,7 +2609,6 @@ int btrfs_remove_block_group(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root *root, u64 group_start); u64 btrfs_reduce_alloc_profile(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 flags); u64 btrfs_get_alloc_profile(struct btrfs_root *root, int data); -void btrfs_set_inode_space_info(struct btrfs_root *root, struct inode *ionde); void btrfs_clear_space_info_full(struct btrfs_fs_info *info); int btrfs_check_data_free_space(struct inode *inode, u64 bytes); void btrfs_free_reserved_data_space(struct inode *inode, u64 bytes); diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c index bbab3ff..b1336f5 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c @@ -3133,6 +3133,8 @@ static int update_space_info(struct btrfs_fs_info *info, u64 flags, init_waitqueue_head(&found->wait); *space_info = found; list_add_rcu(&found->list, &info->space_info); + if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA) + info->data_sinfo = found; return 0; } @@ -3262,12 +3264,6 @@ u64 btrfs_get_alloc_profile(struct btrfs_root *root, int data) return get_alloc_profile(root, flags); } -void btrfs_set_inode_space_info(struct btrfs_root *root, struct inode *inode) -{ - BTRFS_I(inode)->space_info = __find_space_info(root->fs_info, - BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA); -} - /* * This will check the space that the inode allocates from to make sure we have * enough space for bytes. @@ -3276,6 +3272,7 @@ int btrfs_check_data_free_space(struct inode *inode, u64 bytes) { struct btrfs_space_info *data_sinfo; struct btrfs_root *root = BTRFS_I(inode)->root; + struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = root->fs_info; u64 used; int ret = 0, committed = 0, alloc_chunk = 1; @@ -3288,7 +3285,7 @@ int btrfs_check_data_free_space(struct inode *inode, u64 bytes) committed = 1; } - data_sinfo = BTRFS_I(inode)->space_info; + data_sinfo = fs_info->data_sinfo; if (!data_sinfo) goto alloc; @@ -3329,10 +3326,9 @@ alloc: goto commit_trans; } - if (!data_sinfo) { - btrfs_set_inode_space_info(root, inode); - data_sinfo = BTRFS_I(inode)->space_info; - } + if (!data_sinfo) + data_sinfo = fs_info->data_sinfo; + goto again; } @@ -3379,7 +3375,7 @@ void btrfs_free_reserved_data_space(struct inode *inode, u64 bytes) /* make sure bytes are sectorsize aligned */ bytes = (bytes + root->sectorsize - 1) & ~((u64)root->sectorsize - 1); - data_sinfo = BTRFS_I(inode)->space_info; + data_sinfo = root->fs_info->data_sinfo; spin_lock(&data_sinfo->lock); data_sinfo->bytes_may_use -= bytes; trace_btrfs_space_reservation(root->fs_info, "space_info", diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 0d507e6..b189dd8 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -4077,7 +4077,6 @@ static int btrfs_init_locked_inode(struct inode *inode, void *p) struct btrfs_iget_args *args = p; inode->i_ino = args->ino; BTRFS_I(inode)->root = args->root; - btrfs_set_inode_space_info(args->root, inode); return 0; } @@ -4662,7 +4661,6 @@ static struct inode *btrfs_new_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, BTRFS_I(inode)->root = root; BTRFS_I(inode)->generation = trans->transid; inode->i_generation = BTRFS_I(inode)->generation; - btrfs_set_inode_space_info(root, inode); if (S_ISDIR(mode)) owner = 0; @@ -6939,7 +6937,6 @@ struct inode *btrfs_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb) return NULL; ei->root = NULL; - ei->space_info = NULL; ei->generation = 0; ei->last_trans = 0; ei->last_sub_trans = 0;
Inodes always allocate free space with BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA type, which means every inode has the same BTRFS_I(inode)->free_space pointer. This shrinks struct btrfs_inode by 4 bytes (or 8 bytes on 64 bits). Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com> --- fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h | 3 --- fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 3 ++- fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 20 ++++++++------------ fs/btrfs/inode.c | 3 --- 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)