diff mbox

[1/2] btrfs-progs: set generation_v2 any time we write a new root

Message ID 5174C426.3030204@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Eric Sandeen April 22, 2013, 5:01 a.m. UTC
With this integration branch commit in place:

2bd1169 btrfs-progs: root_item generation_v2 is out of sync after btrfsck

I started seeing generation mismatch messages from the kernel
at mount time, after a fresh mkfs(!):

  btrfs: mismatching generation and generation_v2 found in root item...

This is because the code which emits the warning does not do so if
there is a mismatch but generation_v2 is 0; the above commit began
setting generation_v2 to something non-zero, so the warning was emitted.

The reason there is a mismatch at all is because mkfs.btrfs calls
create_data_reloc_tree(), which copies a root, and then calls
btrfs_set_root_generation(), bumping the original copied generation.
But nothing updated generation_v2 to match on the way to disk.

Fix this by updating generation_v2 in btrfs_insert_root(),
as is done in the kernel.

This is safe because it's a new root created by userspace, so
the btrfs_root_item is guaranteed to be big enough to contain
generation_v2.

Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
---

Another example of why we need to get userspace in sync with kernelspace...



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Comments

Anand Jain April 22, 2013, 9:30 a.m. UTC | #1
yeah we should set the v2 parameter at all the place where
  we call btrfs_set_root_generation. Sorry it slipped my mind.
  Thanks for the fix.

Thanks, Anand


On 04/22/2013 01:01 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> With this integration branch commit in place:
>
> 2bd1169 btrfs-progs: root_item generation_v2 is out of sync after btrfsck
>
> I started seeing generation mismatch messages from the kernel
> at mount time, after a fresh mkfs(!):
>
>    btrfs: mismatching generation and generation_v2 found in root item...
>
> This is because the code which emits the warning does not do so if
> there is a mismatch but generation_v2 is 0; the above commit began
> setting generation_v2 to something non-zero, so the warning was emitted.
>
> The reason there is a mismatch at all is because mkfs.btrfs calls
> create_data_reloc_tree(), which copies a root, and then calls
> btrfs_set_root_generation(), bumping the original copied generation.
> But nothing updated generation_v2 to match on the way to disk.
>
> Fix this by updating generation_v2 in btrfs_insert_root(),
> as is done in the kernel.
>
> This is safe because it's a new root created by userspace, so
> the btrfs_root_item is guaranteed to be big enough to contain
> generation_v2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> Another example of why we need to get userspace in sync with kernelspace...
>
> diff --git a/root-tree.c b/root-tree.c
> index 4454147..1823918 100644
> --- a/root-tree.c
> +++ b/root-tree.c
> @@ -105,6 +105,11 @@ int btrfs_insert_root(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root
>   		      *item)
>   {
>   	int ret;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Make sure generation v1 and v2 match. See update_root for details.
> +	 */
> +	btrfs_set_root_generation_v2(item, btrfs_root_generation(item));
>   	ret = btrfs_insert_item(trans, root, key, item, sizeof(*item));
>   	return ret;
>   }
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/root-tree.c b/root-tree.c
index 4454147..1823918 100644
--- a/root-tree.c
+++ b/root-tree.c
@@ -105,6 +105,11 @@  int btrfs_insert_root(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, struct btrfs_root
 		      *item)
 {
 	int ret;
+
+	/*
+	 * Make sure generation v1 and v2 match. See update_root for details.
+	 */
+	btrfs_set_root_generation_v2(item, btrfs_root_generation(item));
 	ret = btrfs_insert_item(trans, root, key, item, sizeof(*item));
 	return ret;
 }