From patchwork Sun Jul 9 19:11:08 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Sweet Tea Dorminy X-Patchwork-Id: 13306086 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3520C00528 for ; Sun, 9 Jul 2023 19:11:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229938AbjGITLY (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jul 2023 15:11:24 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35104 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229769AbjGITLX (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jul 2023 15:11:23 -0400 Received: from box.fidei.email (box.fidei.email [71.19.144.250]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4877103; Sun, 9 Jul 2023 12:11:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from authenticated-user (box.fidei.email [71.19.144.250]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by box.fidei.email (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 32B39804C6; Sun, 9 Jul 2023 15:11:22 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dorminy.me; s=mail; t=1688929882; bh=hRco+aZiR6zV/s62lKw1LnEYYKOCoUoqvQXPvj2ZlrQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Tz7ZYSmiEZ2lIEg4xfaSb5jOTyCytq4oyCRbGPYMJ9UWSivMCMEs0nOuTl6kjWrar QsNyX7H9B1CA9niHYWTjtbWFYJENlhtBhx8wunMudT23msPoVbRRgNd8XwY4iwkVMd cF4XR5U2PVlNeYCvY5MBqBwMROmgVNPAQjTey9vQBSW9SCbjm9Tg3n6ZbWP5F830p4 uC2CmOjkMNV2u6q7PkoFTwubE7OYj4apo7mkNPOVH5q/2JyyYgDRA7CsR8ah/lJdgT vA0YDRFIVHsmJ6jwhdB2Zwc2UVUxZ1/HHx97Z3O5eyHFem6k0s6Q3JTAeK6ttNJq8K l4CXHtnzk48dw== From: Sweet Tea Dorminy To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, ebiggers@google.com, anand.jain@oracle.com, fdmanana@suse.com, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, fsverity@lists.linux.dev, zlang@kernel.org Cc: Sweet Tea Dorminy Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 5/8] generic/613: write some actual data for btrfs Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2023 15:11:08 -0400 Message-Id: <548d104df621ba7532ff1b4ba2076cd3a24a98a0.1688929294.git.sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Currently, the test touches a file and assumes that that is sufficient to generate a new nonce to test for that file. However, btrfs doesn't store an encryption context for a leaf inode, and doesn't store an encryption context for data within a leaf inode until data is actually written. Thus, merely touching the file on btrfs doesn't actually generate a testable nonce. Instead, write a trivial bit of data to each file, which provokes btrfs to generate a encryption context for the data and thus a testable nonce. Signed-off-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy --- tests/generic/613 | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/generic/613 b/tests/generic/613 index 279b1bfb..11f28c74 100755 --- a/tests/generic/613 +++ b/tests/generic/613 @@ -53,11 +53,11 @@ for i in {1..50}; do done for i in {1..50}; do file=$SCRATCH_MNT/v1_policy_dir_1/$i - touch $file + echo "0" > $file inodes+=("$(stat -c %i $file)") file=$SCRATCH_MNT/v2_policy_dir_1/$i - touch $file + echo "0" > $file inodes+=("$(stat -c %i $file)") done _scratch_unmount