Message ID | 99ff0e4021e59bee11dedba4b614d10ac40ca8f5.1742195085.git.wqu@suse.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | btrfs: remove ASSERT()s for folio_order() and folio_test_large() | expand |
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/send.c b/fs/btrfs/send.c index 0c8c58c4f29b..43c29295f477 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/send.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/send.c @@ -5280,7 +5280,6 @@ static int put_file_data(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 offset, u32 len) unsigned cur_len = min_t(unsigned, len, PAGE_SIZE - pg_offset); -again: folio = filemap_lock_folio(mapping, index); if (IS_ERR(folio)) { page_cache_sync_readahead(mapping, @@ -5316,7 +5315,7 @@ static int put_file_data(struct send_ctx *sctx, u64 offset, u32 len) if (folio->mapping != mapping) { folio_unlock(folio); folio_put(folio); - goto again; + continue; } }
The again label is here to retry to get the folio for the current index. When triggering that label, there is no increasement on the iterator. So it can be replaced by a simple "continue" and remove the again label. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> --- fs/btrfs/send.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)