diff mbox series

[v2] btrfs: fix mount failure due to remount races

Message ID a682e48c161eece38f8d803103068fed5959537d.1729665365.git.wqu@suse.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series [v2] btrfs: fix mount failure due to remount races | expand

Commit Message

Qu Wenruo Oct. 23, 2024, 6:38 a.m. UTC
[BUG]
The following reproducer can cause btrfs mount to fail:

  dev="/dev/test/scratch1"
  mnt1="/mnt/test"
  mnt2="/mnt/scratch"

  mkfs.btrfs -f $dev
  mount $dev $mnt1
  btrfs subvolume create $mnt1/subvol1
  btrfs subvolume create $mnt1/subvol2
  umount $mnt1

  mount $dev $mnt1 -o subvol=subvol1
  while mount -o remount,ro $mnt1; do mount -o remount,rw $mnt1; done &
  bg=$!

  while mount $dev $mnt2 -o subvol=subvol2; do umount $mnt2; done

  kill $bg
  wait
  umount -R $mnt1
  umount -R $mnt2

The script will fail with the following error:

 mount: /mnt/scratch: /dev/mapper/test-scratch1 already mounted on /mnt/test.
       dmesg(1) may have more information after failed mount system call.
 umount: /mnt/test: target is busy.
 umount: /mnt/scratch/: not mounted

And there is no kernel error message.

[CAUSE]
During the btrfs mount, to support mounting different subvolumes with
different RO/RW flags, we have a small hack during the mount:

  Retry with matching RO flags if the initial mount fail with -EBUSY.

The problem is, during that retry we do not hold any super block lock
(s_umount), this means there can be another remount process changing the
RO flags of the original fs super block.

If so, we can have an EBUSY error again during retry.
And this time we treat any failure as an error, without any retry and
cause the above EBUSY mount failure.

[FIX]
The current retry behavior is racy because we do not have a super block
thus no way to hold s_umount to prevent the race with remount.

Solve the root problem by allowing fc->sb_flags to mismatch from the
sb->s_flags at btrfs_get_tree_super().

Then at the re-entry point btrfs_get_tree_subvol(), manually check the
fc->s_flags against sb->s_flags, if it's a RO->RW mismatch, then
reconfigure with s_umount lock hold.

This will prevent other remount process to change the flag, and we can
reconfigure the fs race-free.

Fixes: f044b318675f ("btrfs: handle the ro->rw transition for mounting different subvolumes")
Reported-by: Enno Gotthold <egotthold@suse.com>
Reported-by: Fabian Vogt <fvogt@suse.com>
[ Special thanks for the reproducer and early analyze pointing to btrfs ]
Link: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231836
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
Changelog:
v2:
- Instead of brute force retry-until-success-or-failure, allow sb flags
  mismatch during btrfs_get_tree_super()
  So that we can utilize sb->s_umount to prevent race.

- Rebased after patch "btrfs: fix per-subvolume RO/RW flags with new mount API"
  Fortunately or unfortunately my distro is already utilizing the new
  mount API and I found the per-subvolume RO/RW support is broken again.

  Unlike the original expectation, the new API is not the new hope, but
  only allows the old bug to strike back.

  So this patch can only be applied after that fix.
---
 fs/btrfs/super.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

Comments

David Sterba Oct. 23, 2024, 4:32 p.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 05:08:51PM +1030, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> +	if (!(fc->sb_flags & SB_RDONLY) && (mnt->mnt_sb->s_flags & SB_RDONLY))
> +		ret = btrfs_reconfigure(fc);

This gives me a warning (gcc 13.3.0):

fs/btrfs/super.c: In function ‘btrfs_reconfigure_for_mount’:
fs/btrfs/super.c:2011:56: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘&&’ within ‘||’ [-Wparentheses]
 2011 |         if (!fc->oldapi || !(fc->sb_flags & SB_RDONLY) && (mnt->mnt_sb->s_flags & SB_RDONLY))
      |                            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Qu Wenruo Oct. 23, 2024, 8:53 p.m. UTC | #2
在 2024/10/24 03:02, David Sterba 写道:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 05:08:51PM +1030, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> +	if (!(fc->sb_flags & SB_RDONLY) && (mnt->mnt_sb->s_flags & SB_RDONLY))
>> +		ret = btrfs_reconfigure(fc);
>
> This gives me a warning (gcc 13.3.0):
>
> fs/btrfs/super.c: In function ‘btrfs_reconfigure_for_mount’:
> fs/btrfs/super.c:2011:56: warning: suggest parentheses around ‘&&’ within ‘||’ [-Wparentheses]
>   2011 |         if (!fc->oldapi || !(fc->sb_flags & SB_RDONLY) && (mnt->mnt_sb->s_flags & SB_RDONLY))
>        |                            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>
Weird, my local patch/branch shows no fc->oldapi usage, thus no warning.

The involved lines are:

-	ret = btrfs_reconfigure(fc);
+	if (!(fc->sb_flags & SB_RDONLY) && (mnt->mnt_sb->s_flags & SB_RDONLY))
+		ret = btrfs_reconfigure(fc);

Thus no warning.

Thanks,
Qu
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
index d77cce8d633e..d137ce2b5038 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
@@ -1885,18 +1885,21 @@  static int btrfs_get_tree_super(struct fs_context *fc)
 
 	if (sb->s_root) {
 		btrfs_close_devices(fs_devices);
-		if ((fc->sb_flags ^ sb->s_flags) & SB_RDONLY)
-			ret = -EBUSY;
+		/*
+		 * At this stage we may have RO flag mismatch between
+		 * fc->sb_flags and sb->s_flags.
+		 * Caller should detect such mismatch and reconfigure
+		 * with sb->s_umount rwsem hold if needed.
+		 */
 	} else {
 		snprintf(sb->s_id, sizeof(sb->s_id), "%pg", bdev);
 		shrinker_debugfs_rename(sb->s_shrink, "sb-btrfs:%s", sb->s_id);
 		btrfs_sb(sb)->bdev_holder = &btrfs_fs_type;
 		ret = btrfs_fill_super(sb, fs_devices);
-	}
-
-	if (ret) {
-		deactivate_locked_super(sb);
-		return ret;
+		if (ret) {
+			deactivate_locked_super(sb);
+			return ret;
+		}
 	}
 
 	btrfs_clear_oneshot_options(fs_info);
@@ -1983,39 +1986,18 @@  static int btrfs_get_tree_super(struct fs_context *fc)
  *
  * So here we always needs the remount hack to support per-subvolume RO/RW flags.
  */
-static struct vfsmount *btrfs_reconfigure_for_mount(struct fs_context *fc)
+static int btrfs_reconfigure_for_mount(struct fs_context *fc, struct vfsmount *mnt)
 {
-	struct vfsmount *mnt;
-	int ret;
-	const bool ro2rw = !(fc->sb_flags & SB_RDONLY);
+	int ret = 0;
 
-	/*
-	 * We got an EBUSY because our SB_RDONLY flag didn't match the existing
-	 * super block, so invert our setting here and retry the mount so we
-	 * can get our vfsmount.
-	 */
-	if (ro2rw)
-		fc->sb_flags |= SB_RDONLY;
-	else
-		fc->sb_flags &= ~SB_RDONLY;
+	if (fc->sb_flags & SB_RDONLY)
+		return ret;
 
-	mnt = fc_mount(fc);
-	if (IS_ERR(mnt))
-		return mnt;
-
-	if (!ro2rw)
-		return mnt;
-
-	/* We need to convert to rw, call reconfigure. */
-	fc->sb_flags &= ~SB_RDONLY;
 	down_write(&mnt->mnt_sb->s_umount);
-	ret = btrfs_reconfigure(fc);
+	if (!(fc->sb_flags & SB_RDONLY) && (mnt->mnt_sb->s_flags & SB_RDONLY))
+		ret = btrfs_reconfigure(fc);
 	up_write(&mnt->mnt_sb->s_umount);
-	if (ret) {
-		mntput(mnt);
-		return ERR_PTR(ret);
-	}
-	return mnt;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int btrfs_get_tree_subvol(struct fs_context *fc)
@@ -2025,6 +2007,7 @@  static int btrfs_get_tree_subvol(struct fs_context *fc)
 	struct fs_context *dup_fc;
 	struct dentry *dentry;
 	struct vfsmount *mnt;
+	int ret = 0;
 
 	/*
 	 * Setup a dummy root and fs_info for test/set super.  This is because
@@ -2067,11 +2050,16 @@  static int btrfs_get_tree_subvol(struct fs_context *fc)
 	fc->security = NULL;
 
 	mnt = fc_mount(dup_fc);
-	if (PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(mnt) == -EBUSY)
-		mnt = btrfs_reconfigure_for_mount(dup_fc);
-	put_fs_context(dup_fc);
-	if (IS_ERR(mnt))
+	if (IS_ERR(mnt)) {
+		put_fs_context(dup_fc);
 		return PTR_ERR(mnt);
+	}
+	ret = btrfs_reconfigure_for_mount(dup_fc, mnt);
+	put_fs_context(dup_fc);
+	if (ret) {
+		mntput(mnt);
+		return ret;
+	}
 
 	/*
 	 * This free's ->subvol_name, because if it isn't set we have to