From patchwork Sun Jul 9 19:11:10 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Sweet Tea Dorminy X-Patchwork-Id: 13306088 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51AFEEB64DC for ; Sun, 9 Jul 2023 19:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230072AbjGITL2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jul 2023 15:11:28 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35136 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229769AbjGITL0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jul 2023 15:11:26 -0400 Received: from box.fidei.email (box.fidei.email [71.19.144.250]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4A1A128; Sun, 9 Jul 2023 12:11:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from authenticated-user (box.fidei.email [71.19.144.250]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by box.fidei.email (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E6BA804AA; Sun, 9 Jul 2023 15:11:25 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dorminy.me; s=mail; t=1688929885; bh=KsB5sQbySYMhE+PMRxhIhPEsjLq+a0xS6NkFqRAT2JM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=GrVV2ygHXfrPEAvwjwESW1iGJxVvF34RFPfntSSyvRw8RwRZavJgrSjAkRHNeKCHA dmmN3ug6kd2vuAJkTFR4nN/bzhCYArGL5O43yqT0e116RpFAh9+M2bN0dBLNT+nS4O X0AyWZ1jIrVhCRR+ObhgfvALkQwRH0w9Gu0V/rMuB59sewphBQqjOoRzLi1WHhISqu 1l3CD1jUKINhVMyjGYg7MfIZ32Jn/LuyPfefHYvZF2+qZHA+QJy0H3GsA9QSnNH4sb dmY0PPfRUuiE9rNqggU8OOQ+/JtThT9c3PCNscb1VwAz6vr1vNi0bYAv7v4KPHQxqX 6zSxLVdNxdr/A== From: Sweet Tea Dorminy To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, fstests@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com, ebiggers@google.com, anand.jain@oracle.com, fdmanana@suse.com, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, fsverity@lists.linux.dev, zlang@kernel.org Cc: Sweet Tea Dorminy Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 7/8] common/verity: explicitly don't allow btrfs encryption Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2023 15:11:10 -0400 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Currently btrfs encryption doesn't support verity, but it is planned to one day. To be explicit about the lack of support, add a custom error message to the combination. Signed-off-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy --- common/verity | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/common/verity b/common/verity index 77c257d3..5002dd71 100644 --- a/common/verity +++ b/common/verity @@ -218,6 +218,10 @@ _scratch_mkfs_encrypted_verity() # features with -O. Instead -O must be supplied multiple times. _scratch_mkfs -O encrypt -O verity ;; + btrfs) + # currently verity + encryption is not supported + _notrun "btrfs doesn't currently support verity + encryption" + ;; *) _notrun "$FSTYP not supported in _scratch_mkfs_encrypted_verity" ;;