Message ID | 20240916-lan969x-clock-v1-0-0e150336074d@microchip.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | clk: lan966x: add support for lan969x SoC clock driver | expand |
Quoting Daniel Machon (2024-09-16 02:49:18) > Add support for the lan969x SoC clock driver in the existing lan966x > driver. The lan969x clock controller contains 3 PLLs - cpu_clk, ddr_clk > and sys_clk which generates and supplies the clock to various > peripherals within the SoC. > > Patch #1 adds compatible strings for lan969x SKU's in the dt-bindings > > Patch #2 makes the clk_names var const char * const > > Patch #3 prepares the lan966x driver for lan969x, by adding private > match data. > > Patch #4 adds support for lan969x > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com> Am I supposed to pick up microchip clk patches myself this time?
On 18.10.2024 01:59, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Daniel Machon (2024-09-16 02:49:18) >> Add support for the lan969x SoC clock driver in the existing lan966x >> driver. The lan969x clock controller contains 3 PLLs - cpu_clk, ddr_clk >> and sys_clk which generates and supplies the clock to various >> peripherals within the SoC. >> >> Patch #1 adds compatible strings for lan969x SKU's in the dt-bindings >> >> Patch #2 makes the clk_names var const char * const >> >> Patch #3 prepares the lan966x driver for lan969x, by adding private >> match data. >> >> Patch #4 adds support for lan969x >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com> >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com> > > Am I supposed to pick up microchip clk patches myself this time? It's on my track. I already have it on my local queue for a while. Sorry for not mentioning it yet. I need to run some tests. Thank you, Claudiu >
Quoting claudiu beznea (2024-10-18 01:34:16) > > > On 18.10.2024 01:59, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Daniel Machon (2024-09-16 02:49:18) > >> Add support for the lan969x SoC clock driver in the existing lan966x > >> driver. The lan969x clock controller contains 3 PLLs - cpu_clk, ddr_clk > >> and sys_clk which generates and supplies the clock to various > >> peripherals within the SoC. > >> > >> Patch #1 adds compatible strings for lan969x SKU's in the dt-bindings > >> > >> Patch #2 makes the clk_names var const char * const > >> > >> Patch #3 prepares the lan966x driver for lan969x, by adding private > >> match data. > >> > >> Patch #4 adds support for lan969x > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com> > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com> > > > > Am I supposed to pick up microchip clk patches myself this time? > > It's on my track. I already have it on my local queue for a while. Sorry > for not mentioning it yet. I need to run some tests. > Cool. Thanks for taking care of it!
On 16.09.2024 12:49, Daniel Machon wrote: > Daniel Machon (4): > dt-bindings: clock: add support for lan969x > clk: lan966x: make clk_names const char * const > clk: lan966x: prepare driver for lan969x support > clk: lan966x: add support for lan969x SoC clock driver Applied to clk-microchip, thanks!