Message ID | 1470999363-9978-1-git-send-email-keguang.zhang@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested, archived |
Delegated to: | Stephen Boyd |
Headers | show |
On 08/12, Keguang Zhang wrote: > From: Kelvin Cheung <keguang.zhang@gmail.com> > > This patch changes the OSC clock name to "osc_clk". > > Signed-off-by: Kelvin Cheung <keguang.zhang@gmail.com> > --- Yes, but why?
On 08/16, Kelvin Cheung wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > 2016-08-16 7:28 GMT+08:00 Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>: > > > On 08/12, Keguang Zhang wrote: > > > From: Kelvin Cheung <keguang.zhang@gmail.com> > > > > > > This patch changes the OSC clock name to "osc_clk". > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kelvin Cheung <keguang.zhang@gmail.com> > > > --- > > > > Yes, but why? > > > > > Loongson1C uses a 24MHz oscillator, hence "osc_clk" sounds more appropriate > > So then should we replace all the osc_33m_clk names with osc_clk? This patch only modifies one name and it looks like a clkdev lookup is created that still has osc_33m_clk for the connection name in drivers/clk/clk-ls1x.c, so merging it would mean things break? I also wonder what the pin is actually called in the datasheet, because that should be what the cpufreq driver uses in clk_get() as the connection id. If that's osc_33m_clk then it's better to leave it alone even if the frequency is different.
diff --git a/arch/mips/loongson32/common/platform.c b/arch/mips/loongson32/common/platform.c index 4d12e36..fb60602 100644 --- a/arch/mips/loongson32/common/platform.c +++ b/arch/mips/loongson32/common/platform.c @@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ void __init ls1x_serial_set_uartclk(struct platform_device *pdev) /* CPUFreq */ static struct plat_ls1x_cpufreq ls1x_cpufreq_pdata = { .clk_name = "cpu_clk", - .osc_clk_name = "osc_33m_clk", + .osc_clk_name = "osc_clk", .max_freq = 266 * 1000, .min_freq = 33 * 1000, };