diff mbox series

[1/3] clk: fix redefinition of clk_prepare on MIPS with HAVE_LEGACY_CLK

Message ID 20201115170950.304460-2-krzk@kernel.org (mailing list archive)
State Rejected, archived
Headers show
Series [1/3] clk: fix redefinition of clk_prepare on MIPS with HAVE_LEGACY_CLK | expand

Commit Message

Krzysztof Kozlowski Nov. 15, 2020, 5:09 p.m. UTC
COMMON_CLK even though is a user-selectable symbol, is still selected by
multiple other config options.  COMMON_CLK should not be used when
legacy clocks are provided by architecture, so it correctly depends on
!HAVE_LEGACY_CLK.

However it is possible to create a config which selects both COMMON_CLK
(by SND_SUN8I_CODEC) and HAVE_LEGACY_CLK (by SOC_RT305X) which leads to
compile errors (MIPS architecture):

    drivers/clk/clk.c:855:6: error: redefinition of ‘clk_unprepare’
    In file included from drivers/clk/clk.c:9:
    include/linux/clk.h:263:20: note: previous definition of ‘clk_unprepare’ was here

The definitions clk_bulk_prepare() (and unprepare) already have proper
surrounding #ifdef so add them also for clk_prepare()/clk_unprepare().

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/clk/clk.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

Comments

Stephen Boyd Nov. 18, 2020, 7:41 a.m. UTC | #1
Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2020-11-15 09:09:48)
> COMMON_CLK even though is a user-selectable symbol, is still selected by
> multiple other config options.  COMMON_CLK should not be used when
> legacy clocks are provided by architecture, so it correctly depends on
> !HAVE_LEGACY_CLK.
> 
> However it is possible to create a config which selects both COMMON_CLK
> (by SND_SUN8I_CODEC) and HAVE_LEGACY_CLK (by SOC_RT305X) which leads to

Why is SND_SUN8I_CODEC selecting COMMON_CLK? Or really, why is
SOC_RT305X selecting HAVE_LEGACY_CLK?
Krzysztof Kozlowski Nov. 18, 2020, 7:48 a.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 11:41:57PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2020-11-15 09:09:48)
> > COMMON_CLK even though is a user-selectable symbol, is still selected by
> > multiple other config options.  COMMON_CLK should not be used when
> > legacy clocks are provided by architecture, so it correctly depends on
> > !HAVE_LEGACY_CLK.
> > 
> > However it is possible to create a config which selects both COMMON_CLK
> > (by SND_SUN8I_CODEC) and HAVE_LEGACY_CLK (by SOC_RT305X) which leads to
> 
> Why is SND_SUN8I_CODEC selecting COMMON_CLK? Or really, why is
> SOC_RT305X selecting HAVE_LEGACY_CLK?

The SND_SUN8I_CODEC I fixed in following patch (I sent separately v2 of
it).

The SOC_RT305X select HAVE_LEGACY_CLK? because it is an old, Ralink
platform, not converted to Common clock frm. Few clock operations are
defined in: arch/mips/ralink/clk.c

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Stephen Boyd Nov. 25, 2020, 12:11 a.m. UTC | #3
Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2020-11-17 23:48:12)
> On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 11:41:57PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2020-11-15 09:09:48)
> > > COMMON_CLK even though is a user-selectable symbol, is still selected by
> > > multiple other config options.  COMMON_CLK should not be used when
> > > legacy clocks are provided by architecture, so it correctly depends on
> > > !HAVE_LEGACY_CLK.
> > > 
> > > However it is possible to create a config which selects both COMMON_CLK
> > > (by SND_SUN8I_CODEC) and HAVE_LEGACY_CLK (by SOC_RT305X) which leads to
> > 
> > Why is SND_SUN8I_CODEC selecting COMMON_CLK? Or really, why is
> > SOC_RT305X selecting HAVE_LEGACY_CLK?
> 
> The SND_SUN8I_CODEC I fixed in following patch (I sent separately v2 of
> it).
> 
> The SOC_RT305X select HAVE_LEGACY_CLK? because it is an old, Ralink
> platform, not converted to Common clock frm. Few clock operations are
> defined in: arch/mips/ralink/clk.c
> 

Ok so this patch isn't necessary then? It seems OK to select
HAVE_LEGACY_CLK but not to select COMMON_CLK unless it's architecture
code that can't be enabled when the other architecture code is selecting
HAVE_LEGACY_CLK.
Krzysztof Kozlowski Nov. 25, 2020, 2:15 p.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 04:11:31PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2020-11-17 23:48:12)
> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 11:41:57PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2020-11-15 09:09:48)
> > > > COMMON_CLK even though is a user-selectable symbol, is still selected by
> > > > multiple other config options.  COMMON_CLK should not be used when
> > > > legacy clocks are provided by architecture, so it correctly depends on
> > > > !HAVE_LEGACY_CLK.
> > > > 
> > > > However it is possible to create a config which selects both COMMON_CLK
> > > > (by SND_SUN8I_CODEC) and HAVE_LEGACY_CLK (by SOC_RT305X) which leads to
> > > 
> > > Why is SND_SUN8I_CODEC selecting COMMON_CLK? Or really, why is
> > > SOC_RT305X selecting HAVE_LEGACY_CLK?
> > 
> > The SND_SUN8I_CODEC I fixed in following patch (I sent separately v2 of
> > it).
> > 
> > The SOC_RT305X select HAVE_LEGACY_CLK? because it is an old, Ralink
> > platform, not converted to Common clock frm. Few clock operations are
> > defined in: arch/mips/ralink/clk.c
> > 
> 
> Ok so this patch isn't necessary then?

For this particular build failure - it is not necessary anymore.

However there might more of such errors - just not discovered yet. Also,
the clock bulk API has such ifdefs so it kind of symmetrical and
consistent approach.

> It seems OK to select
> HAVE_LEGACY_CLK but not to select COMMON_CLK unless it's architecture
> code that can't be enabled when the other architecture code is selecting
> HAVE_LEGACY_CLK.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Stephen Boyd Nov. 27, 2020, 8:19 p.m. UTC | #5
Quoting Krzysztof Kozlowski (2020-11-25 06:15:05)
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 04:11:31PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > 
> > Ok so this patch isn't necessary then?
> 
> For this particular build failure - it is not necessary anymore.
> 
> However there might more of such errors - just not discovered yet. Also,
> the clock bulk API has such ifdefs so it kind of symmetrical and
> consistent approach.
> 

Ok. Patches always welcome.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index f83dac54ed85..f4f68c7c2fb5 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -841,6 +841,7 @@  static void clk_core_unprepare_lock(struct clk_core *core)
 	clk_prepare_unlock();
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_CLK_PREPARE
 /**
  * clk_unprepare - undo preparation of a clock source
  * @clk: the clk being unprepared
@@ -860,6 +861,7 @@  void clk_unprepare(struct clk *clk)
 	clk_core_unprepare_lock(clk->core);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_unprepare);
+#endif
 
 static int clk_core_prepare(struct clk_core *core)
 {
@@ -921,6 +923,7 @@  static int clk_core_prepare_lock(struct clk_core *core)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_CLK_PREPARE
 /**
  * clk_prepare - prepare a clock source
  * @clk: the clk being prepared
@@ -941,6 +944,7 @@  int clk_prepare(struct clk *clk)
 	return clk_core_prepare_lock(clk->core);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_prepare);
+#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_CLK_PREPARE */
 
 static void clk_core_disable(struct clk_core *core)
 {