diff mbox series

MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Qualcomm clock drivers

Message ID 20211203013901.3460496-1-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org (mailing list archive)
State Awaiting Upstream, archived
Headers show
Series MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Qualcomm clock drivers | expand

Commit Message

Bjorn Andersson Dec. 3, 2021, 1:39 a.m. UTC
Most SoC specific clock drivers are picked by respective SoC maintainer
and then sent to the clock maintainers on their way upstream.

This has however not been the case for the Qualcomm clock drivers -
which doesn't actually have a maintainer per MAINTAINERS and where the
framework maintainers have just carried the Qualcomm effort as well,
presumably as a result of Stephen's history.

Move the maintainership of the Qualcomm clock drivers to use the same
model as other SoC vendors and document the ownership by actually
introducing an entry in MAINTAINERS.

Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
---
 MAINTAINERS | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

Comments

Stephen Boyd Dec. 3, 2021, 1:51 a.m. UTC | #1
Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2021-12-02 17:39:01)
> Most SoC specific clock drivers are picked by respective SoC maintainer
> and then sent to the clock maintainers on their way upstream.
> 
> This has however not been the case for the Qualcomm clock drivers -
> which doesn't actually have a maintainer per MAINTAINERS and where the
> framework maintainers have just carried the Qualcomm effort as well,
> presumably as a result of Stephen's history.
> 
> Move the maintainership of the Qualcomm clock drivers to use the same
> model as other SoC vendors and document the ownership by actually
> introducing an entry in MAINTAINERS.
> 
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> ---

Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Bjorn Andersson Dec. 6, 2021, 10:30 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, 2 Dec 2021 17:39:01 -0800, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> Most SoC specific clock drivers are picked by respective SoC maintainer
> and then sent to the clock maintainers on their way upstream.
> 
> This has however not been the case for the Qualcomm clock drivers -
> which doesn't actually have a maintainer per MAINTAINERS and where the
> framework maintainers have just carried the Qualcomm effort as well,
> presumably as a result of Stephen's history.
> 
> [...]

Applied, thanks!

[1/1] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Qualcomm clock drivers
      commit: e3fd5f632cdd00e3652e4a5fe743c8c052af11a8

Best regards,
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 88fcc4e7ff37..a644e2a5e79f 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -15671,6 +15671,15 @@  F:	Documentation/admin-guide/media/qcom_camss.rst
 F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/*camss*
 F:	drivers/media/platform/qcom/camss/
 
+QUALCOMM CLOCK DRIVERS
+M:	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
+L:	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
+S:	Supported
+T:	git git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/qcom/linux.git
+F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,*
+F:	drivers/clk/qcom/
+F:	include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,*
+
 QUALCOMM CORE POWER REDUCTION (CPR) AVS DRIVER
 M:	Niklas Cassel <nks@flawful.org>
 L:	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org