diff mbox series

[v2,1/2] clk: imx93: Move IMX93_CLK_END macro to clk driver

Message ID 20240627082426.394937-2-pengfei.li_1@nxp.com (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series clk: imx93: Move IMX93_CLK_END macro to clk driver | expand

Commit Message

Pengfei Li June 27, 2024, 8:24 a.m. UTC
IMX93_CLK_END was previously defined in imx93-clock.h to indicate
the number of clocks, but it is not part of the ABI, so it should
be moved to clk driver.

Signed-off-by: Pengfei Li <pengfei.li_1@nxp.com>
---

Notes:
    Change for v2:
    - Use pre-processor define to simplify code.

 drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Comments

Krzysztof Kozlowski June 28, 2024, 7:38 a.m. UTC | #1
On 27/06/2024 10:24, Pengfei Li wrote:
> IMX93_CLK_END was previously defined in imx93-clock.h to indicate
> the number of clocks, but it is not part of the ABI, so it should
> be moved to clk driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pengfei Li <pengfei.li_1@nxp.com>
> ---
> 
> Notes:
>     Change for v2:
>     - Use pre-processor define to simplify code.
> 
>  drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

Are you sure this builds fine? If you need to define it here, it means
some part of that unit file already uses the define. If so, you include
the header. If you include the header, you should see fat warning.

Really, people, just build your patches...

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Pengfei Li June 29, 2024, 2:49 a.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 09:38:54AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 27/06/2024 10:24, Pengfei Li wrote:
> > IMX93_CLK_END was previously defined in imx93-clock.h to indicate
> > the number of clocks, but it is not part of the ABI, so it should
> > be moved to clk driver.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Pengfei Li <pengfei.li_1@nxp.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > Notes:
> >     Change for v2:
> >     - Use pre-processor define to simplify code.
> > 
> >  drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> Are you sure this builds fine? If you need to define it here, it means
> some part of that unit file already uses the define. If so, you include
> the header. If you include the header, you should see fat warning.
> 
> Really, people, just build your patches...
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
> 

Hi Krzysztof,

Yes, you're right, this macro definition has indeed been used. But
this clk-imx93.c driver file is the only place where this macro is
used. So maybe it would be more appropriate to define this macro in
C rather than in the header file. Meanwhile, I also built my patch,
but no warnings were found.

BR,
Pengfei Li
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
index c6a9bc8ecc1f..c8b65146e76e 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx93.c
@@ -15,6 +15,8 @@ 
 
 #include "clk.h"
 
+#define IMX93_CLK_END 202
+
 enum clk_sel {
 	LOW_SPEED_IO_SEL,
 	NON_IO_SEL,