From patchwork Thu Sep 13 08:51:34 2018 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ondrej Mosnacek X-Patchwork-Id: 10598871 X-Patchwork-Delegate: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C853F14DB for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:51:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B102A632 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:51:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id A8CBA2A7F4; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:51:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.9 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC63E2A632 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 08:51:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726741AbeIMOAS (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Sep 2018 10:00:18 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]:55249 "EHLO mail-wm0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726692AbeIMOAS (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Sep 2018 10:00:18 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id c14-v6so5230402wmb.4 for ; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 01:51:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=z/vIlfuym56uDgjbw1o3+orK/P/w57SbnAuXeDDCS0o=; b=GpotQQX4lY3N8sj6vVDuD/aFw1/MIk6kgRBRQ0ewSMFZ1En/ESihVnqUOxDCP0jBfC PQrp7sCxTG6AmBmR/CtEHjjdxnQYMHzQ0iXg/8J9pNVVkLxFIg5QzJAkzY3KyxgmX4NW fRZ1jsQeptks2de3tn6ow5p2vkWDsyC1CSfK4tOTP6ht8LkWgy/IxFliKMHiNmrYI2kx qxGUfueIFE450adJuxgHkOiwqYVo2KMZ9yS/1KNH9UU0YumjCbqIRQXnUL1ys5UvERjt M4xa76V7yO8cptx+x0KRF/pEZ4otqkH8xTQ1crY+6hKoLqeaDJAkcxikGlXHE8PC37V+ tSRg== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51BUhK3vHRX4bflHD0GtblRvSXSFHSqFO2M19t3YOmH7mwJKq880 Ig6i02aYPUS5zFJna7WZwsaq2g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdbKEEvQs2EK13TdVyW09bgBZ9FWk5+nZaKCzBYgT8OkSNl1ZTlhh89qvOSlxTun2QLYYzQDzA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:1dc9:: with SMTP id d192-v6mr4872569wmd.140.1536828704980; Thu, 13 Sep 2018 01:51:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain.com (nat-pool-brq-t.redhat.com. [213.175.37.10]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l10-v6sm6598730wre.0.2018.09.13.01.51.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 13 Sep 2018 01:51:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Ondrej Mosnacek To: Herbert Xu Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, Mikulas Patocka , Eric Biggers , Ondrej Mosnacek Subject: [PATCH v4 4/4] crypto: lrw - Do not use auxiliary buffer Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 10:51:34 +0200 Message-Id: <20180913085134.11694-5-omosnace@redhat.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20180913085134.11694-1-omosnace@redhat.com> References: <20180913085134.11694-1-omosnace@redhat.com> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP This patch simplifies the LRW template to recompute the LRW tweaks from scratch in the second pass and thus also removes the need to allocate a dynamic buffer using kmalloc(). As discussed at [1], the use of kmalloc causes deadlocks with dm-crypt. PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS (x86_64) Performed using: https://gitlab.com/omos/linux-crypto-bench Crypto driver used: lrw(ecb-aes-aesni) The results show that the new code has about the same performance as the old code. For 512-byte message it seems to be even slightly faster, but that might be just noise. Before: ALGORITHM KEY (b) DATA (B) TIME ENC (ns) TIME DEC (ns) lrw(aes) 256 64 200 203 lrw(aes) 320 64 202 204 lrw(aes) 384 64 204 205 lrw(aes) 256 512 415 415 lrw(aes) 320 512 432 440 lrw(aes) 384 512 449 451 lrw(aes) 256 4096 1838 1995 lrw(aes) 320 4096 2123 1980 lrw(aes) 384 4096 2100 2119 lrw(aes) 256 16384 7183 6954 lrw(aes) 320 16384 7844 7631 lrw(aes) 384 16384 8256 8126 lrw(aes) 256 32768 14772 14484 lrw(aes) 320 32768 15281 15431 lrw(aes) 384 32768 16469 16293 After: ALGORITHM KEY (b) DATA (B) TIME ENC (ns) TIME DEC (ns) lrw(aes) 256 64 197 196 lrw(aes) 320 64 200 197 lrw(aes) 384 64 203 199 lrw(aes) 256 512 385 380 lrw(aes) 320 512 401 395 lrw(aes) 384 512 415 415 lrw(aes) 256 4096 1869 1846 lrw(aes) 320 4096 2080 1981 lrw(aes) 384 4096 2160 2109 lrw(aes) 256 16384 7077 7127 lrw(aes) 320 16384 7807 7766 lrw(aes) 384 16384 8108 8357 lrw(aes) 256 32768 14111 14454 lrw(aes) 320 32768 15268 15082 lrw(aes) 384 32768 16581 16250 [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/8/23/1315 Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek --- crypto/lrw.c | 280 ++++++++++----------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 229 deletions(-) diff --git a/crypto/lrw.c b/crypto/lrw.c index 7377b5b486fd..6fcf0d431185 100644 --- a/crypto/lrw.c +++ b/crypto/lrw.c @@ -29,8 +29,6 @@ #include #include -#define LRW_BUFFER_SIZE 128u - #define LRW_BLOCK_SIZE 16 struct priv { @@ -56,19 +54,7 @@ struct priv { }; struct rctx { - be128 buf[LRW_BUFFER_SIZE / sizeof(be128)]; - be128 t; - - be128 *ext; - - struct scatterlist srcbuf[2]; - struct scatterlist dstbuf[2]; - struct scatterlist *src; - struct scatterlist *dst; - - unsigned int left; - struct skcipher_request subreq; }; @@ -152,86 +138,31 @@ static int next_index(u32 *counter) return 127; } -static int post_crypt(struct skcipher_request *req) +/* + * We compute the tweak masks twice (both before and after the ECB encryption or + * decryption) to avoid having to allocate a temporary buffer and/or make + * mutliple calls to the 'ecb(..)' instance, which usually would be slower than + * just doing the next_index() calls again. + */ +static int xor_tweak(struct skcipher_request *req, bool second_pass) { - struct rctx *rctx = skcipher_request_ctx(req); - be128 *buf = rctx->ext ?: rctx->buf; - struct skcipher_request *subreq; const int bs = LRW_BLOCK_SIZE; - struct skcipher_walk w; - struct scatterlist *sg; - unsigned offset; - int err; - - subreq = &rctx->subreq; - err = skcipher_walk_virt(&w, subreq, false); - - while (w.nbytes) { - unsigned int avail = w.nbytes; - be128 *wdst; - - wdst = w.dst.virt.addr; - - do { - be128_xor(wdst, buf++, wdst); - wdst++; - } while ((avail -= bs) >= bs); - - err = skcipher_walk_done(&w, avail); - } - - rctx->left -= subreq->cryptlen; - - if (err || !rctx->left) - goto out; - - rctx->dst = rctx->dstbuf; - - scatterwalk_done(&w.out, 0, 1); - sg = w.out.sg; - offset = w.out.offset; - - if (rctx->dst != sg) { - rctx->dst[0] = *sg; - sg_unmark_end(rctx->dst); - scatterwalk_crypto_chain(rctx->dst, sg_next(sg), 2); - } - rctx->dst[0].length -= offset - sg->offset; - rctx->dst[0].offset = offset; - -out: - return err; -} - -static int pre_crypt(struct skcipher_request *req) -{ struct crypto_skcipher *tfm = crypto_skcipher_reqtfm(req); - struct rctx *rctx = skcipher_request_ctx(req); struct priv *ctx = crypto_skcipher_ctx(tfm); - be128 *buf = rctx->ext ?: rctx->buf; - struct skcipher_request *subreq; - const int bs = LRW_BLOCK_SIZE; + struct rctx *rctx = skcipher_request_ctx(req); + be128 t = rctx->t; struct skcipher_walk w; - struct scatterlist *sg; - unsigned cryptlen; - unsigned offset; - bool more; __be32 *iv; u32 counter[4]; int err; - subreq = &rctx->subreq; - skcipher_request_set_tfm(subreq, tfm); - - cryptlen = subreq->cryptlen; - more = rctx->left > cryptlen; - if (!more) - cryptlen = rctx->left; - - skcipher_request_set_crypt(subreq, rctx->src, rctx->dst, - cryptlen, req->iv); + if (second_pass) { + req = &rctx->subreq; + /* set to our TFM to enforce correct alignment: */ + skcipher_request_set_tfm(req, tfm); + } - err = skcipher_walk_virt(&w, subreq, false); + err = skcipher_walk_virt(&w, req, false); iv = (__be32 *)w.iv; counter[0] = be32_to_cpu(iv[3]); @@ -248,16 +179,14 @@ static int pre_crypt(struct skcipher_request *req) wdst = w.dst.virt.addr; do { - *buf++ = rctx->t; - be128_xor(wdst++, &rctx->t, wsrc++); + be128_xor(wdst++, &t, wsrc++); /* T <- I*Key2, using the optimization * discussed in the specification */ - be128_xor(&rctx->t, &rctx->t, - &ctx->mulinc[next_index(counter)]); + be128_xor(&t, &t, &ctx->mulinc[next_index(counter)]); } while ((avail -= bs) >= bs); - if (w.nbytes == w.total) { + if (second_pass && w.nbytes == w.total) { iv[0] = cpu_to_be32(counter[3]); iv[1] = cpu_to_be32(counter[2]); iv[2] = cpu_to_be32(counter[1]); @@ -267,175 +196,68 @@ static int pre_crypt(struct skcipher_request *req) err = skcipher_walk_done(&w, avail); } - skcipher_request_set_tfm(subreq, ctx->child); - skcipher_request_set_crypt(subreq, rctx->dst, rctx->dst, - cryptlen, NULL); - - if (err || !more) - goto out; - - rctx->src = rctx->srcbuf; - - scatterwalk_done(&w.in, 0, 1); - sg = w.in.sg; - offset = w.in.offset; - - if (rctx->src != sg) { - rctx->src[0] = *sg; - sg_unmark_end(rctx->src); - scatterwalk_crypto_chain(rctx->src, sg_next(sg), 2); - } - rctx->src[0].length -= offset - sg->offset; - rctx->src[0].offset = offset; - -out: return err; } -static int init_crypt(struct skcipher_request *req, crypto_completion_t done) +static int xor_tweak_pre(struct skcipher_request *req) { - struct priv *ctx = crypto_skcipher_ctx(crypto_skcipher_reqtfm(req)); - struct rctx *rctx = skcipher_request_ctx(req); - struct skcipher_request *subreq; - gfp_t gfp; - - subreq = &rctx->subreq; - skcipher_request_set_callback(subreq, req->base.flags, done, req); - - gfp = req->base.flags & CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_SLEEP ? GFP_KERNEL : - GFP_ATOMIC; - rctx->ext = NULL; - - subreq->cryptlen = LRW_BUFFER_SIZE; - if (req->cryptlen > LRW_BUFFER_SIZE) { - unsigned int n = min(req->cryptlen, (unsigned int)PAGE_SIZE); - - rctx->ext = kmalloc(n, gfp); - if (rctx->ext) - subreq->cryptlen = n; - } - - rctx->src = req->src; - rctx->dst = req->dst; - rctx->left = req->cryptlen; - - /* calculate first value of T */ - memcpy(&rctx->t, req->iv, sizeof(rctx->t)); - - /* T <- I*Key2 */ - gf128mul_64k_bbe(&rctx->t, ctx->table); - - return 0; + return xor_tweak(req, false); } -static void exit_crypt(struct skcipher_request *req) +static int xor_tweak_post(struct skcipher_request *req) { - struct rctx *rctx = skcipher_request_ctx(req); - - rctx->left = 0; - - if (rctx->ext) - kzfree(rctx->ext); + return xor_tweak(req, true); } -static int do_encrypt(struct skcipher_request *req, int err) -{ - struct rctx *rctx = skcipher_request_ctx(req); - struct skcipher_request *subreq; - - subreq = &rctx->subreq; - - while (!err && rctx->left) { - err = pre_crypt(req) ?: - crypto_skcipher_encrypt(subreq) ?: - post_crypt(req); - - if (err == -EINPROGRESS || err == -EBUSY) - return err; - } - - exit_crypt(req); - return err; -} - -static void encrypt_done(struct crypto_async_request *areq, int err) +static void crypt_done(struct crypto_async_request *areq, int err) { struct skcipher_request *req = areq->data; - struct skcipher_request *subreq; - struct rctx *rctx; - - rctx = skcipher_request_ctx(req); - - if (err == -EINPROGRESS) { - if (rctx->left != req->cryptlen) - return; - goto out; - } - subreq = &rctx->subreq; - subreq->base.flags &= CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_BACKLOG; + if (!err) + err = xor_tweak_post(req); - err = do_encrypt(req, err ?: post_crypt(req)); - if (rctx->left) - return; - -out: skcipher_request_complete(req, err); } -static int encrypt(struct skcipher_request *req) -{ - return do_encrypt(req, init_crypt(req, encrypt_done)); -} - -static int do_decrypt(struct skcipher_request *req, int err) +static void init_crypt(struct skcipher_request *req) { + struct priv *ctx = crypto_skcipher_ctx(crypto_skcipher_reqtfm(req)); struct rctx *rctx = skcipher_request_ctx(req); - struct skcipher_request *subreq; + struct skcipher_request *subreq = &rctx->subreq; - subreq = &rctx->subreq; - - while (!err && rctx->left) { - err = pre_crypt(req) ?: - crypto_skcipher_decrypt(subreq) ?: - post_crypt(req); + skcipher_request_set_tfm(subreq, ctx->child); + skcipher_request_set_callback(subreq, req->base.flags, crypt_done, req); + /* pass req->iv as IV (will be used by xor_tweak, ECB will ignore it) */ + skcipher_request_set_crypt(subreq, req->dst, req->dst, + req->cryptlen, req->iv); - if (err == -EINPROGRESS || err == -EBUSY) - return err; - } + /* calculate first value of T */ + memcpy(&rctx->t, req->iv, sizeof(rctx->t)); - exit_crypt(req); - return err; + /* T <- I*Key2 */ + gf128mul_64k_bbe(&rctx->t, ctx->table); } -static void decrypt_done(struct crypto_async_request *areq, int err) +static int encrypt(struct skcipher_request *req) { - struct skcipher_request *req = areq->data; - struct skcipher_request *subreq; - struct rctx *rctx; - - rctx = skcipher_request_ctx(req); - - if (err == -EINPROGRESS) { - if (rctx->left != req->cryptlen) - return; - goto out; - } - - subreq = &rctx->subreq; - subreq->base.flags &= CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MAY_BACKLOG; - - err = do_decrypt(req, err ?: post_crypt(req)); - if (rctx->left) - return; + struct rctx *rctx = skcipher_request_ctx(req); + struct skcipher_request *subreq = &rctx->subreq; -out: - skcipher_request_complete(req, err); + init_crypt(req); + return xor_tweak_pre(req) ?: + crypto_skcipher_encrypt(subreq) ?: + xor_tweak_post(req); } static int decrypt(struct skcipher_request *req) { - return do_decrypt(req, init_crypt(req, decrypt_done)); + struct rctx *rctx = skcipher_request_ctx(req); + struct skcipher_request *subreq = &rctx->subreq; + + init_crypt(req); + return xor_tweak_pre(req) ?: + crypto_skcipher_decrypt(subreq) ?: + xor_tweak_post(req); } static int init_tfm(struct crypto_skcipher *tfm)