Message ID | 20200907062400.GA15841@gondor.apana.org.au (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Delegated to: | Herbert Xu |
Headers | show |
Series | crypto: sun4i-ss - Fix SHA1 hash on A33-variant with BE CPU | expand |
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 04:24:00PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Sun, Sep 06, 2020 at 04:52:24PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > > > >> drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c:483:35: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@ expected unsigned int [assigned] [usertype] v @@ got restricted __le32 [usertype] @@ > > drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c:483:35: sparse: expected unsigned int [assigned] [usertype] v > > drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c:483:35: sparse: got restricted __le32 [usertype] > > drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c:485:35: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@ expected unsigned int [assigned] [usertype] v @@ got restricted __be32 [usertype] @@ > > drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c:485:35: sparse: expected unsigned int [assigned] [usertype] v > > drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c:485:35: sparse: got restricted __be32 [usertype] > > drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c:490:27: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@ expected unsigned int [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] v @@ got restricted __le32 [usertype] @@ > > drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c:490:27: sparse: expected unsigned int [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] v > > drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c:490:27: sparse: got restricted __le32 [usertype] > > This appears to be a genuine bug, on big-endian CPUs at least. > > ---8<--- > When the hash is written out on the A33 variant, it is incorrectly > swabbed on big-endian CPUs, when it should simply be written out as > is because it's already in the right format. This was caught by > sparse warnings. > > Instead of using cpu_to_Xe32 followed by a memcpy, this patch > converts the final hash write to use put_unaligned instead. This > simplifies the code and makes the A33 variant handling a lot clearer. > > This patch also fixes the incorrect endianness marking on wb, > although this should have no effect in the genereated code. > > Fixes: 1e02e6fbdadb ("crypto: sun4i-ss - add the A33 variant of SS") > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> > > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c b/drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c > index dc35edd90034..84f7921de577 100644 > --- a/drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c > +++ b/drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ > * You could find the datasheet in Documentation/arm/sunxi.rst > */ > #include "sun4i-ss.h" > +#include <asm/unaligned.h> > #include <linux/scatterlist.h> > > /* This is a totally arbitrary value */ > @@ -196,7 +197,7 @@ static int sun4i_hash(struct ahash_request *areq) > struct sg_mapping_iter mi; > int in_r, err = 0; > size_t copied = 0; > - __le32 wb = 0; > + u32 wb = 0; > > dev_dbg(ss->dev, "%s %s bc=%llu len=%u mode=%x wl=%u h0=%0x", > __func__, crypto_tfm_alg_name(areq->base.tfm), > @@ -408,7 +409,7 @@ static int sun4i_hash(struct ahash_request *areq) > > nbw = op->len - 4 * nwait; > if (nbw) { > - wb = cpu_to_le32(*(u32 *)(op->buf + nwait * 4)); > + wb = le32_to_cpup((__le32 *)(op->buf + nwait * 4)); > wb &= GENMASK((nbw * 8) - 1, 0); > > op->byte_count += nbw; > @@ -417,7 +418,7 @@ static int sun4i_hash(struct ahash_request *areq) > > /* write the remaining bytes of the nbw buffer */ > wb |= ((1 << 7) << (nbw * 8)); > - bf[j++] = le32_to_cpu(wb); > + ((__le32 *)bf)[j++] = cpu_to_le32(wb); > > /* > * number of space to pad to obtain 64o minus 8(size) minus 4 (final 1) > @@ -479,16 +480,16 @@ static int sun4i_hash(struct ahash_request *areq) > /* Get the hash from the device */ > if (op->mode == SS_OP_SHA1) { > for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) { > + v = readl(ss->base + SS_MD0 + i * 4); > if (ss->variant->sha1_in_be) > - v = cpu_to_le32(readl(ss->base + SS_MD0 + i * 4)); > + put_unaligned(v, areq->result + i * 4); > else > - v = cpu_to_be32(readl(ss->base + SS_MD0 + i * 4)); > - memcpy(areq->result + i * 4, &v, 4); > + put_unaligned_be32(v, areq->result + i * 4); > } > } else { > for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) { > - v = cpu_to_le32(readl(ss->base + SS_MD0 + i * 4)); > - memcpy(areq->result + i * 4, &v, 4); > + v = readl(ss->base + SS_MD0 + i * 4); > + put_unaligned_le32(v, areq->result + i * 4); > } > } > modprobe tcrypt on BE+next-20200828 fail with this patch on A33: alg: ahash: sha1-sun4i-ss test failed (wrong result) on test vector 0, cfg=\"init+update+final aligned buffer\" I will try to debug it.
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 04:24:00PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Sun, Sep 06, 2020 at 04:52:24PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > > > >> drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c:483:35: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@ expected unsigned int [assigned] [usertype] v @@ got restricted __le32 [usertype] @@ > > drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c:483:35: sparse: expected unsigned int [assigned] [usertype] v > > drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c:483:35: sparse: got restricted __le32 [usertype] > > drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c:485:35: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@ expected unsigned int [assigned] [usertype] v @@ got restricted __be32 [usertype] @@ > > drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c:485:35: sparse: expected unsigned int [assigned] [usertype] v > > drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c:485:35: sparse: got restricted __be32 [usertype] > > drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c:490:27: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different base types) @@ expected unsigned int [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] v @@ got restricted __le32 [usertype] @@ > > drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c:490:27: sparse: expected unsigned int [addressable] [assigned] [usertype] v > > drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c:490:27: sparse: got restricted __le32 [usertype] > > This appears to be a genuine bug, on big-endian CPUs at least. > > ---8<--- > When the hash is written out on the A33 variant, it is incorrectly > swabbed on big-endian CPUs, when it should simply be written out as > is because it's already in the right format. This was caught by > sparse warnings. > > Instead of using cpu_to_Xe32 followed by a memcpy, this patch > converts the final hash write to use put_unaligned instead. This > simplifies the code and makes the A33 variant handling a lot clearer. > > This patch also fixes the incorrect endianness marking on wb, > although this should have no effect in the genereated code. > > Fixes: 1e02e6fbdadb ("crypto: sun4i-ss - add the A33 variant of SS") > Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> > > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c b/drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c > index dc35edd90034..84f7921de577 100644 > --- a/drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c > +++ b/drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ > * You could find the datasheet in Documentation/arm/sunxi.rst > */ > #include "sun4i-ss.h" > +#include <asm/unaligned.h> > #include <linux/scatterlist.h> > > /* This is a totally arbitrary value */ > @@ -196,7 +197,7 @@ static int sun4i_hash(struct ahash_request *areq) > struct sg_mapping_iter mi; > int in_r, err = 0; > size_t copied = 0; > - __le32 wb = 0; > + u32 wb = 0; > > dev_dbg(ss->dev, "%s %s bc=%llu len=%u mode=%x wl=%u h0=%0x", > __func__, crypto_tfm_alg_name(areq->base.tfm), > @@ -408,7 +409,7 @@ static int sun4i_hash(struct ahash_request *areq) > > nbw = op->len - 4 * nwait; > if (nbw) { > - wb = cpu_to_le32(*(u32 *)(op->buf + nwait * 4)); > + wb = le32_to_cpup((__le32 *)(op->buf + nwait * 4)); > wb &= GENMASK((nbw * 8) - 1, 0); > > op->byte_count += nbw; > @@ -417,7 +418,7 @@ static int sun4i_hash(struct ahash_request *areq) > > /* write the remaining bytes of the nbw buffer */ > wb |= ((1 << 7) << (nbw * 8)); > - bf[j++] = le32_to_cpu(wb); > + ((__le32 *)bf)[j++] = cpu_to_le32(wb); > > /* > * number of space to pad to obtain 64o minus 8(size) minus 4 (final 1) > @@ -479,16 +480,16 @@ static int sun4i_hash(struct ahash_request *areq) > /* Get the hash from the device */ > if (op->mode == SS_OP_SHA1) { > for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) { > + v = readl(ss->base + SS_MD0 + i * 4); > if (ss->variant->sha1_in_be) > - v = cpu_to_le32(readl(ss->base + SS_MD0 + i * 4)); > + put_unaligned(v, areq->result + i * 4); The put_unaligned should be _le32. This fix the modprobe tcrypt fail.
diff --git a/drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c b/drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c index dc35edd90034..84f7921de577 100644 --- a/drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c +++ b/drivers/crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-hash.c @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ * You could find the datasheet in Documentation/arm/sunxi.rst */ #include "sun4i-ss.h" +#include <asm/unaligned.h> #include <linux/scatterlist.h> /* This is a totally arbitrary value */ @@ -196,7 +197,7 @@ static int sun4i_hash(struct ahash_request *areq) struct sg_mapping_iter mi; int in_r, err = 0; size_t copied = 0; - __le32 wb = 0; + u32 wb = 0; dev_dbg(ss->dev, "%s %s bc=%llu len=%u mode=%x wl=%u h0=%0x", __func__, crypto_tfm_alg_name(areq->base.tfm), @@ -408,7 +409,7 @@ static int sun4i_hash(struct ahash_request *areq) nbw = op->len - 4 * nwait; if (nbw) { - wb = cpu_to_le32(*(u32 *)(op->buf + nwait * 4)); + wb = le32_to_cpup((__le32 *)(op->buf + nwait * 4)); wb &= GENMASK((nbw * 8) - 1, 0); op->byte_count += nbw; @@ -417,7 +418,7 @@ static int sun4i_hash(struct ahash_request *areq) /* write the remaining bytes of the nbw buffer */ wb |= ((1 << 7) << (nbw * 8)); - bf[j++] = le32_to_cpu(wb); + ((__le32 *)bf)[j++] = cpu_to_le32(wb); /* * number of space to pad to obtain 64o minus 8(size) minus 4 (final 1) @@ -479,16 +480,16 @@ static int sun4i_hash(struct ahash_request *areq) /* Get the hash from the device */ if (op->mode == SS_OP_SHA1) { for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) { + v = readl(ss->base + SS_MD0 + i * 4); if (ss->variant->sha1_in_be) - v = cpu_to_le32(readl(ss->base + SS_MD0 + i * 4)); + put_unaligned(v, areq->result + i * 4); else - v = cpu_to_be32(readl(ss->base + SS_MD0 + i * 4)); - memcpy(areq->result + i * 4, &v, 4); + put_unaligned_be32(v, areq->result + i * 4); } } else { for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) { - v = cpu_to_le32(readl(ss->base + SS_MD0 + i * 4)); - memcpy(areq->result + i * 4, &v, 4); + v = readl(ss->base + SS_MD0 + i * 4); + put_unaligned_le32(v, areq->result + i * 4); } }