@@ -71,7 +71,6 @@ static int nx_sha256_update(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
struct sha256_state *sctx = shash_desc_ctx(desc);
struct nx_crypto_ctx *nx_ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(&desc->tfm->base);
struct nx_csbcpb *csbcpb = (struct nx_csbcpb *)nx_ctx->csbcpb;
- struct nx_sg *in_sg;
struct nx_sg *out_sg;
u64 to_process = 0, leftover, total;
unsigned long irq_flags;
@@ -97,7 +96,6 @@ static int nx_sha256_update(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
NX_CPB_FDM(csbcpb) |= NX_FDM_INTERMEDIATE;
NX_CPB_FDM(csbcpb) |= NX_FDM_CONTINUATION;
- in_sg = nx_ctx->in_sg;
max_sg_len = min_t(u64, nx_ctx->ap->sglen,
nx_driver.of.max_sg_len/sizeof(struct nx_sg));
max_sg_len = min_t(u64, max_sg_len,
@@ -114,17 +112,12 @@ static int nx_sha256_update(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
}
do {
- /*
- * to_process: the SHA256_BLOCK_SIZE data chunk to process in
- * this update. This value is also restricted by the sg list
- * limits.
- */
- to_process = total - to_process;
- to_process = to_process & ~(SHA256_BLOCK_SIZE - 1);
+ int used_sgs = 0;
+ struct nx_sg *in_sg = nx_ctx->in_sg;
if (buf_len) {
data_len = buf_len;
- in_sg = nx_build_sg_list(nx_ctx->in_sg,
+ in_sg = nx_build_sg_list(in_sg,
(u8 *) sctx->buf,
&data_len,
max_sg_len);
@@ -133,15 +126,27 @@ static int nx_sha256_update(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
rc = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
+ used_sgs = in_sg - nx_ctx->in_sg;
}
+ /* to_process: SHA256_BLOCK_SIZE aligned chunk to be
+ * processed in this iteration. This value is restricted
+ * by sg list limits and number of sgs we already used
+ * for leftover data. (see above)
+ * In ideal case, we could allow NX_PAGE_SIZE * max_sg_len,
+ * but because data may not be aligned, we need to account
+ * for that too. */
+ to_process = min_t(u64, total,
+ (max_sg_len - 1 - used_sgs) * NX_PAGE_SIZE);
+ to_process = to_process & ~(SHA256_BLOCK_SIZE - 1);
+
data_len = to_process - buf_len;
in_sg = nx_build_sg_list(in_sg, (u8 *) data,
&data_len, max_sg_len);
nx_ctx->op.inlen = (nx_ctx->in_sg - in_sg) * sizeof(struct nx_sg);
- to_process = (data_len + buf_len);
+ to_process = data_len + buf_len;
leftover = total - to_process;
/*
@@ -71,7 +71,6 @@ static int nx_sha512_update(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
struct sha512_state *sctx = shash_desc_ctx(desc);
struct nx_crypto_ctx *nx_ctx = crypto_tfm_ctx(&desc->tfm->base);
struct nx_csbcpb *csbcpb = (struct nx_csbcpb *)nx_ctx->csbcpb;
- struct nx_sg *in_sg;
struct nx_sg *out_sg;
u64 to_process, leftover = 0, total;
unsigned long irq_flags;
@@ -97,7 +96,6 @@ static int nx_sha512_update(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
NX_CPB_FDM(csbcpb) |= NX_FDM_INTERMEDIATE;
NX_CPB_FDM(csbcpb) |= NX_FDM_CONTINUATION;
- in_sg = nx_ctx->in_sg;
max_sg_len = min_t(u64, nx_ctx->ap->sglen,
nx_driver.of.max_sg_len/sizeof(struct nx_sg));
max_sg_len = min_t(u64, max_sg_len,
@@ -114,18 +112,12 @@ static int nx_sha512_update(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
}
do {
- /*
- * to_process: the SHA512_BLOCK_SIZE data chunk to process in
- * this update. This value is also restricted by the sg list
- * limits.
- */
- to_process = total - leftover;
- to_process = to_process & ~(SHA512_BLOCK_SIZE - 1);
- leftover = total - to_process;
+ int used_sgs = 0;
+ struct nx_sg *in_sg = nx_ctx->in_sg;
if (buf_len) {
data_len = buf_len;
- in_sg = nx_build_sg_list(nx_ctx->in_sg,
+ in_sg = nx_build_sg_list(in_sg,
(u8 *) sctx->buf,
&data_len, max_sg_len);
@@ -133,8 +125,20 @@ static int nx_sha512_update(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
rc = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
+ used_sgs = in_sg - nx_ctx->in_sg;
}
+ /* to_process: SHA512_BLOCK_SIZE aligned chunk to be
+ * processed in this iteration. This value is restricted
+ * by sg list limits and number of sgs we already used
+ * for leftover data. (see above)
+ * In ideal case, we could allow NX_PAGE_SIZE * max_sg_len,
+ * but because data may not be aligned, we need to account
+ * for that too. */
+ to_process = min_t(u64, total,
+ (max_sg_len - 1 - used_sgs) * NX_PAGE_SIZE);
+ to_process = to_process & ~(SHA512_BLOCK_SIZE - 1);
+
data_len = to_process - buf_len;
in_sg = nx_build_sg_list(in_sg, (u8 *) data,
&data_len, max_sg_len);
@@ -146,7 +150,7 @@ static int nx_sha512_update(struct shash_desc *desc, const u8 *data,
goto out;
}
- to_process = (data_len + buf_len);
+ to_process = data_len + buf_len;
leftover = total - to_process;
/*
Commit 000851119e80 changed sha256/512 update functions to pass more data to nx_build_sg_list(), which ends with sg list overflows and usually with update functions failing for data larger than max_sg_len * NX_PAGE_SIZE. This happens because: - both "total" and "to_process" are updated, which leads to "to_process" getting overflowed for some data lengths For example: In first iteration "total" is 50, and let's assume "to_process" is 30 due to sg limits. At the end of first iteration "total" is set to 20. At start of 2nd iteration "to_process" overflows on: to_process = total - to_process; - "in_sg" is not reset to nx_ctx->in_sg after each iteration - nx_build_sg_list() is hitting overflow because the amount of data passed to it would require more than sgmax elements - as consequence of previous item, data stored in overflowed sg list may no longer be aligned to SHA*_BLOCK_SIZE This patch changes sha256/512 update functions so that "to_process" respects sg limits and never tries to pass more data to nx_build_sg_list() to avoid overflows. "to_process" is calculated as minimum of "total" and sg limits at start of every iteration. Fixes: 000851119e80 ("crypto: nx - Fix SHA concurrence issue and sg limit bounds") Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> Cc: Leonidas Da Silva Barbosa <leosilva@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Marcelo Henrique Cerri <mhcerri@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Fionnuala Gunter <fin@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> --- drivers/crypto/nx/nx-sha256.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++----------- drivers/crypto/nx/nx-sha512.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------ 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)