From patchwork Wed Dec 21 06:58:08 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Herbert Xu X-Patchwork-Id: 13078483 X-Patchwork-Delegate: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8726C4332F for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 06:58:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229917AbiLUG6S (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Dec 2022 01:58:18 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50824 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229533AbiLUG6R (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Dec 2022 01:58:17 -0500 Received: from formenos.hmeau.com (helcar.hmeau.com [216.24.177.18]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 673A31C92B; Tue, 20 Dec 2022 22:58:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from loth.rohan.me.apana.org.au ([192.168.167.2]) by formenos.hmeau.com with smtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Debian)) id 1p7t3I-0098Bf-9y; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 14:58:09 +0800 Received: by loth.rohan.me.apana.org.au (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 21 Dec 2022 14:58:08 +0800 Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 14:58:08 +0800 From: Herbert Xu To: Eric Biggers Cc: "Chen, Rong A" , kernel test robot , "Jason A. Donenfeld" , oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux Crypto Mailing List Subject: [v2 PATCH] crypto: lib/blake2s - Split up test function to halve stack usage Message-ID: References: <202211072109.qvrnjNKo-lkp@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 08:34:18PM +0000, Eric Biggers wrote: > > Shouldn't these functions have 'noinline_for_stack' added to them? Indeed they should. Thanks! ---8<--- Reduce the stack usage further by splitting up the test function. Also squash blocks and unaligned_blocks into one array. Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu diff --git a/lib/crypto/blake2s-selftest.c b/lib/crypto/blake2s-selftest.c index 7d77dea15587..d0634ed6a937 100644 --- a/lib/crypto/blake2s-selftest.c +++ b/lib/crypto/blake2s-selftest.c @@ -545,7 +545,7 @@ static const u8 blake2s_testvecs[][BLAKE2S_HASH_SIZE] __initconst = { 0xd6, 0x98, 0x6b, 0x07, 0x10, 0x65, 0x52, 0x65, }, }; -bool __init blake2s_selftest(void) +static bool __init noinline_for_stack blake2s_digest_test(void) { u8 key[BLAKE2S_KEY_SIZE]; u8 buf[ARRAY_SIZE(blake2s_testvecs)]; @@ -589,11 +589,20 @@ bool __init blake2s_selftest(void) } } + return success; +} + +static bool __init noinline_for_stack blake2s_random_test(void) +{ + struct blake2s_state state; + bool success = true; + int i, l; + for (i = 0; i < 32; ++i) { enum { TEST_ALIGNMENT = 16 }; - u8 unaligned_block[BLAKE2S_BLOCK_SIZE + TEST_ALIGNMENT - 1] + u8 blocks[BLAKE2S_BLOCK_SIZE * 2 + TEST_ALIGNMENT - 1] __aligned(TEST_ALIGNMENT); - u8 blocks[BLAKE2S_BLOCK_SIZE * 2]; + u8 *unaligned_block = blocks + BLAKE2S_BLOCK_SIZE; struct blake2s_state state1, state2; get_random_bytes(blocks, sizeof(blocks)); @@ -630,3 +639,13 @@ bool __init blake2s_selftest(void) return success; } + +bool __init blake2s_selftest(void) +{ + bool success; + + success = blake2s_digest_test(); + success &= blake2s_random_test(); + + return success; +}