diff mbox series

[v6,21/26] selftests: net/fcnal: Initial tcp_authopt support

Message ID ad19d5c8a24054d48e1c35bb0ec92075b9f0dc6a.1658815925.git.cdleonard@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Not Applicable
Delegated to: Herbert Xu
Headers show
Series tcp: Initial support for RFC5925 auth option | expand

Commit Message

Leonard Crestez July 26, 2022, 6:15 a.m. UTC 
Tests are mostly copied from tcp_md5 with minor changes.

It covers VRF support but only based on binding multiple servers: not
multiple keys bound to different interfaces.

Also add a specific -t tcp_authopt to run only these tests specifically.

Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <cdleonard@gmail.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh | 329 +++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 327 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Eric Dumazet July 26, 2022, 7:06 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 8:16 AM Leonard Crestez <cdleonard@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Tests are mostly copied from tcp_md5 with minor changes.
>
> It covers VRF support but only based on binding multiple servers: not
> multiple keys bound to different interfaces.
>
> Also add a specific -t tcp_authopt to run only these tests specifically.
>

Thanks for the test.

Could you amend the existing TCP MD5 test to make sure dual sockets
mode is working ?

Apparently, if we have a dual stack listener socket (AF_INET6),
correct incoming IPV4 SYNs are dropped.

 If this is the case, fixing MD5 should happen first ;)

I think that we are very late in the cycle (linux-5.19 should be
released in 5 days), and your patch set should not be merged so late.

Thanks.

> Signed-off-by: Leonard Crestez <cdleonard@gmail.com>
> ---
>
Eric Dumazet July 26, 2022, 7:27 a.m. UTC | #2 
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 9:06 AM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 8:16 AM Leonard Crestez <cdleonard@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Tests are mostly copied from tcp_md5 with minor changes.
> >
> > It covers VRF support but only based on binding multiple servers: not
> > multiple keys bound to different interfaces.
> >
> > Also add a specific -t tcp_authopt to run only these tests specifically.
> >
>
> Thanks for the test.
>
> Could you amend the existing TCP MD5 test to make sure dual sockets
> mode is working ?
>
> Apparently, if we have a dual stack listener socket (AF_INET6),
> correct incoming IPV4 SYNs are dropped.
>
>  If this is the case, fixing MD5 should happen first ;)
>
> I think that we are very late in the cycle (linux-5.19 should be
> released in 5 days), and your patch set should not be merged so late.

I suspect bug was added in

commit 7bbb765b73496699a165d505ecdce962f903b422
Author: Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed Feb 23 17:57:40 2022 +0000

    net/tcp: Merge TCP-MD5 inbound callbacks

a possible fix (also removing an indirect call for IPV4) could be:

diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index ba2bdc81137490bd1748cde95789f8d2bff3ab0f..66b883d1683ddf7de6a8959a2b4e025a74c830b1
100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -4534,8 +4534,14 @@ tcp_inbound_md5_hash(const struct sock *sk,
const struct sk_buff *skb,
        }

        /* check the signature */
-       genhash = tp->af_specific->calc_md5_hash(newhash, hash_expected,
-                                                NULL, skb);
+       if (family == AF_INET)
+               genhash = tcp_v4_md5_hash_skb(newhash,
+                                             hash_expected,
+                                             NULL, skb);
+       else
+               genhash = tp->af_specific->calc_md5_hash(newhash,
+                                                        hash_expected,
+                                                        NULL, skb);

        if (genhash || memcmp(hash_location, newhash, 16) != 0) {
                NET_INC_STATS(sock_net(sk), LINUX_MIB_TCPMD5FAILURE);
Leonard Crestez July 27, 2022, 8:29 a.m. UTC | #3 
On 7/26/22 10:27, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 9:06 AM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 8:16 AM Leonard Crestez <cdleonard@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Tests are mostly copied from tcp_md5 with minor changes.
>>>
>>> It covers VRF support but only based on binding multiple servers: not
>>> multiple keys bound to different interfaces.
>>>
>>> Also add a specific -t tcp_authopt to run only these tests specifically.
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for the test.
>>
>> Could you amend the existing TCP MD5 test to make sure dual sockets
>> mode is working ?
>>
>> Apparently, if we have a dual stack listener socket (AF_INET6),
>> correct incoming IPV4 SYNs are dropped.

>>   If this is the case, fixing MD5 should happen first ;

I remember looking into this and my conclusion was that ipv4-mapped-ipv6 
is not worth supporting for AO, at least not in the initial version.

Instead I just wrote a test to check that ipv4-mapped-ipv6 fails for AO:
https://github.com/cdleonard/tcp-authopt-test/blob/main/tcp_authopt_test/test_verify_capture.py#L191

On a closer look it does appear that support existed for 
ipv4-mapped-ipv6 in TCP-MD5 but my test didn't actually exercise it 
correctly so the test had to be fixed.


Do you think it makes sense to add support for ipv4-mapped-ipv6 for AO? 
It's not particularly difficult to test, it was skipped due to a lack of 
application use case and to keep the initial series smaller.

Adding support for this later as a separate commit should be fine. Since 
ivp4-mapped-ipv6 addresses shouldn't appear on the wire giving them 
special treatment "later" should raise no compatibility concerns.


>> I think that we are very late in the cycle (linux-5.19 should be
>> released in 5 days), and your patch set should not be merged so late.

This was posted in order to get code reviews, I'm not actually expecting 
inclusion.

--
Regards,
Leonard
Eric Dumazet July 27, 2022, 9:27 a.m. UTC | #4 
On Wed, Jul 27, 2022 at 10:29 AM Leonard Crestez <cdleonard@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 7/26/22 10:27, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 9:06 AM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 8:16 AM Leonard Crestez <cdleonard@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Tests are mostly copied from tcp_md5 with minor changes.
> >>>
> >>> It covers VRF support but only based on binding multiple servers: not
> >>> multiple keys bound to different interfaces.
> >>>
> >>> Also add a specific -t tcp_authopt to run only these tests specifically.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Thanks for the test.
> >>
> >> Could you amend the existing TCP MD5 test to make sure dual sockets
> >> mode is working ?
> >>
> >> Apparently, if we have a dual stack listener socket (AF_INET6),
> >> correct incoming IPV4 SYNs are dropped.
>
> >>   If this is the case, fixing MD5 should happen first ;
>
> I remember looking into this and my conclusion was that ipv4-mapped-ipv6
> is not worth supporting for AO, at least not in the initial version.
>
> Instead I just wrote a test to check that ipv4-mapped-ipv6 fails for AO:
> https://github.com/cdleonard/tcp-authopt-test/blob/main/tcp_authopt_test/test_verify_capture.py#L191
>
> On a closer look it does appear that support existed for
> ipv4-mapped-ipv6 in TCP-MD5 but my test didn't actually exercise it
> correctly so the test had to be fixed.
>
>
> Do you think it makes sense to add support for ipv4-mapped-ipv6 for AO?
> It's not particularly difficult to test, it was skipped due to a lack of
> application use case and to keep the initial series smaller.

I think this makes sense. ipv4-mapped support is definitely used.

>
> Adding support for this later as a separate commit should be fine. Since
> ivp4-mapped-ipv6 addresses shouldn't appear on the wire giving them
> special treatment "later" should raise no compatibility concerns.
>
>
> >> I think that we are very late in the cycle (linux-5.19 should be
> >> released in 5 days), and your patch set should not be merged so late.
>
> This was posted in order to get code reviews, I'm not actually expecting
> inclusion.

To be clear, I am supporting this work and would like to see it being
merged hopefully soon ;)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh
index 03b586760164..6b443aa0d89e 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/fcnal-test.sh
@@ -830,10 +830,330 @@  ipv4_ping()
 }
 
 ################################################################################
 # IPv4 TCP
 
+#
+# TCP Authentication Option Tests
+#
+
+# try to enable tcp_authopt sysctl
+enable_tcp_authopt()
+{
+	if [[ -e /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_authopt ]]; then
+		sysctl -w net.ipv4.tcp_authopt=1
+	fi
+}
+
+# check if tcp_authopt is compiled with a client-side bind test
+has_tcp_authopt()
+{
+	run_cmd_nsb nettest -b -A ${MD5_PW} -r ${NSA_IP}
+}
+
+# Verify /proc/net/tcp_authopt is empty in all namespaces
+check_tcp_authopt_key_leak()
+{
+	local ns cnt
+
+	for ns in $NSA $NSB $NSC; do
+		if ! ip netns list | grep -q $ns; then
+			continue
+		fi
+		cnt=$(ip netns exec "$ns" cat /proc/net/tcp_authopt | wc -l)
+		if [[ $cnt != 1 ]]; then
+			echo "FAIL: leaked tcp_authopt keys in netns $ns"
+			ip netns exec $ns cat /proc/net/tcp_authopt
+			return 1
+		fi
+	done
+}
+
+log_check_tcp_authopt_key_leak()
+{
+	check_tcp_authopt_key_leak
+	log_test $? 0 "TCP-AO: Key leak check"
+}
+
+ipv4_tcp_authopt_novrf()
+{
+	enable_tcp_authopt
+	if ! has_tcp_authopt; then
+		echo "TCP-AO appears to be missing, skip"
+		return 0
+	fi
+
+	log_start
+	run_cmd nettest -s -A ${MD5_PW} -m ${NSB_IP} &
+	sleep 1
+	run_cmd_nsb nettest -r ${NSA_IP} -A ${MD5_PW}
+	log_test $? 0 "AO: Single address config"
+
+	log_start
+	run_cmd nettest -s  &
+	sleep 1
+	run_cmd_nsb nettest -r ${NSA_IP} -A ${MD5_PW}
+	log_test $? 2 "AO: Server no config, client uses password"
+
+	log_start
+	run_cmd nettest -s -A ${MD5_PW} -m ${NSB_IP} &
+	sleep 1
+	run_cmd_nsb nettest -r ${NSA_IP} -A ${MD5_WRONG_PW}
+	log_test $? 2 "AO: Client uses wrong password"
+	log_check_tcp_authopt_key_leak
+
+	log_start
+	run_cmd nettest -s -A ${MD5_PW} -m ${NSB_LO_IP} &
+	sleep 1
+	run_cmd_nsb nettest -r ${NSA_IP} -A ${MD5_PW}
+	log_test $? 2 "AO: Client address does not match address configured on server"
+	log_check_tcp_authopt_key_leak
+
+	# client in prefix
+	log_start
+	run_cmd nettest -s -A ${MD5_PW} -m ${NS_NET} &
+	sleep 1
+	run_cmd_nsb nettest -r ${NSA_IP} -A ${MD5_PW}
+	log_test $? 0 "AO: Prefix config"
+
+	# client in prefix, wrong password
+	log_start
+	show_hint "Should timeout since client uses wrong password"
+	run_cmd nettest -s -A ${MD5_PW} -m ${NS_NET} &
+	sleep 1
+	run_cmd_nsb nettest -r ${NSA_IP} -A ${MD5_WRONG_PW}
+	log_test $? 2 "AO: Prefix config, client uses wrong password"
+	log_check_tcp_authopt_key_leak
+
+	# client outside of prefix
+	log_start
+	show_hint "Should timeout due to MD5 mismatch"
+	run_cmd nettest -s -A ${MD5_PW} -m ${NS_NET} &
+	sleep 1
+	run_cmd_nsb nettest -c ${NSB_LO_IP} -r ${NSA_IP} -A ${MD5_PW}
+	log_test $? 2 "AO: Prefix config, client address not in configured prefix"
+	log_check_tcp_authopt_key_leak
+}
+
+ipv6_tcp_authopt_novrf()
+{
+	enable_tcp_authopt
+	if ! has_tcp_authopt; then
+		echo "TCP-AO appears to be missing, skip"
+		return 0
+	fi
+
+	log_start
+	run_cmd nettest -6 -s -A ${MD5_PW} &
+	sleep 1
+	run_cmd_nsb nettest -6 -r ${NSA_IP6} -A ${MD5_PW}
+	log_test $? 0 "AO: Simple correct config"
+
+	log_start
+	run_cmd nettest -6 -s
+	sleep 1
+	run_cmd_nsb nettest -6 -r ${NSA_IP6} -A ${MD5_PW}
+	log_test $? 2 "AO: Server no config, client uses password"
+
+	log_start
+	run_cmd nettest -6 -s -A ${MD5_PW} -m ${NSB_IP6} &
+	sleep 1
+	run_cmd_nsb nettest -6 -r ${NSA_IP6} -A ${MD5_WRONG_PW}
+	log_test $? 2 "AO: Client uses wrong password"
+
+	log_start
+	run_cmd nettest -6 -s -A ${MD5_PW} -m ${NSB_LO_IP6} &
+	sleep 1
+	run_cmd_nsb nettest -6 -r ${NSA_IP6} -A ${MD5_PW}
+	log_test $? 2 "AO: Client address does not match address configured on server"
+}
+
+ipv4_tcp_authopt_vrf()
+{
+	enable_tcp_authopt
+	if ! has_tcp_authopt; then
+		echo "TCP-AO appears to be missing, skip"
+		return 0
+	fi
+
+	log_start
+	run_cmd nettest -s -I ${VRF} -A ${MD5_PW} &
+	sleep 1
+	run_cmd_nsb nettest -r ${NSA_IP} -A ${MD5_PW}
+	log_test $? 0 "AO: VRF: Simple config"
+
+	#
+	# duplicate config between default VRF and a VRF
+	#
+
+	log_start
+	run_cmd nettest -s -I ${VRF} -A ${MD5_PW} -m ${NSB_IP} &
+	run_cmd nettest -s -A ${MD5_WRONG_PW} -m ${NSB_IP} &
+	sleep 1
+	run_cmd_nsb nettest -r ${NSA_IP} -A ${MD5_PW}
+	log_test $? 0 "AO: VRF: Servers in default VRF and VRF, client in VRF"
+
+	log_start
+	run_cmd nettest -s -I ${VRF} -A ${MD5_PW} -m ${NSB_IP} &
+	run_cmd nettest -s -A ${MD5_WRONG_PW} -m ${NSB_IP} &
+	sleep 1
+	run_cmd_nsc nettest -r ${NSA_IP} -A ${MD5_WRONG_PW}
+	log_test $? 0 "AO: VRF: Servers in default VRF and VRF, client in default VRF"
+
+	log_start
+	show_hint "Should timeout since client in default VRF uses VRF password"
+	run_cmd nettest -s -I ${VRF} -A ${MD5_PW} -m ${NSB_IP} &
+	run_cmd nettest -s -A ${MD5_WRONG_PW} -m ${NSB_IP} &
+	sleep 1
+	run_cmd_nsc nettest -r ${NSA_IP} -A ${MD5_PW}
+	log_test $? 2 "AO: VRF: Servers in default VRF and VRF, conn in default VRF with VRF pw"
+
+	log_start
+	show_hint "Should timeout since client in VRF uses default VRF password"
+	run_cmd nettest -s -I ${VRF} -A ${MD5_PW} -m ${NSB_IP} &
+	run_cmd nettest -s -A ${MD5_WRONG_PW} -m ${NSB_IP} &
+	sleep 1
+	run_cmd_nsb nettest -r ${NSA_IP} -A ${MD5_WRONG_PW}
+	log_test $? 2 "AO: VRF: Servers in default VRF and VRF, conn in VRF with default VRF pw"
+
+	test_ipv4_tcp_authopt_vrf__global_server__bind_ifindex0
+}
+
+test_ipv4_tcp_authopt_vrf__global_server__bind_ifindex0()
+{
+	# This particular test needs tcp_l3mdev_accept=1 for Global server to accept VRF connections
+	local old_tcp_l3mdev_accept
+	old_tcp_l3mdev_accept=$(get_sysctl net.ipv4.tcp_l3mdev_accept)
+	set_sysctl net.ipv4.tcp_l3mdev_accept=1
+
+	log_start
+	run_cmd nettest -s -A ${MD5_PW} --force-bind-key-ifindex &
+	sleep 1
+	run_cmd_nsb nettest -r ${NSA_IP} -A ${MD5_PW}
+	log_test $? 2 "AO: VRF: Global server, Key bound to ifindex=0 rejects VRF connection"
+
+	log_start
+	run_cmd nettest -s -A ${MD5_PW} --force-bind-key-ifindex &
+	sleep 1
+	run_cmd_nsc nettest -r ${NSA_IP} -A ${MD5_PW}
+	log_test $? 0 "AO: VRF: Global server, key bound to ifindex=0 accepts non-VRF connection"
+	log_start
+
+	run_cmd nettest -s -A ${MD5_PW} --no-bind-key-ifindex &
+	sleep 1
+	run_cmd_nsb nettest -r ${NSA_IP} -A ${MD5_PW}
+	log_test $? 0 "AO: VRF: Global server, key not bound to ifindex accepts VRF connection"
+
+	log_start
+	run_cmd nettest -s -A ${MD5_PW} --no-bind-key-ifindex &
+	sleep 1
+	run_cmd_nsc nettest -r ${NSA_IP} -A ${MD5_PW}
+	log_test $? 0 "AO: VRF: Global server, key not bound to ifindex accepts non-VRF connection"
+
+	# restore value
+	set_sysctl net.ipv4.tcp_l3mdev_accept="$old_tcp_l3mdev_accept"
+}
+
+ipv6_tcp_authopt_vrf()
+{
+	enable_tcp_authopt
+	if ! has_tcp_authopt; then
+		echo "TCP-AO appears to be missing, skip"
+		return 0
+	fi
+
+	log_start
+	run_cmd nettest -6 -s -I ${VRF} -A ${MD5_PW} &
+	sleep 1
+	run_cmd_nsb nettest -6 -r ${NSA_IP6} -A ${MD5_PW}
+	log_test $? 0 "AO: VRF: Simple config"
+
+	#
+	# duplicate config between default VRF and a VRF
+	#
+
+	log_start
+	run_cmd nettest -6 -s -I ${VRF} -A ${MD5_PW} -m ${NSB_IP6} &
+	run_cmd nettest -6 -s -A ${MD5_WRONG_PW} -m ${NSB_IP6} &
+	sleep 1
+	run_cmd_nsb nettest -6 -r ${NSA_IP6} -A ${MD5_PW}
+	log_test $? 0 "AO: VRF: Servers in default VRF and VRF, client in VRF"
+
+	log_start
+	run_cmd nettest -6 -s -I ${VRF} -A ${MD5_PW} -m ${NSB_IP6} &
+	run_cmd nettest -6 -s -A ${MD5_WRONG_PW} -m ${NSB_IP6} &
+	sleep 1
+	run_cmd_nsc nettest -6 -r ${NSA_IP6} -A ${MD5_WRONG_PW}
+	log_test $? 0 "AO: VRF: Servers in default VRF and VRF, client in default VRF"
+
+	log_start
+	show_hint "Should timeout since client in default VRF uses VRF password"
+	run_cmd nettest -6 -s -I ${VRF} -A ${MD5_PW} -m ${NSB_IP6} &
+	run_cmd nettest -6 -s -A ${MD5_WRONG_PW} -m ${NSB_IP6} &
+	sleep 1
+	run_cmd_nsc nettest -6 -r ${NSA_IP6} -A ${MD5_PW}
+	log_test $? 2 "AO: VRF: Servers in default VRF and VRF, conn in default VRF with VRF pw"
+
+	log_start
+	show_hint "Should timeout since client in VRF uses default VRF password"
+	run_cmd nettest -6 -s -I ${VRF} -A ${MD5_PW} -m ${NSB_IP6} &
+	run_cmd nettest -6 -s -A ${MD5_WRONG_PW} -m ${NSB_IP6} &
+	sleep 1
+	run_cmd_nsb nettest -6 -r ${NSA_IP6} -A ${MD5_WRONG_PW}
+	log_test $? 2 "AO: VRF: Servers in default VRF and VRF, conn in VRF with default VRF pw"
+
+	log_start
+	run_cmd nettest -6 -s -I ${VRF} -A ${MD5_PW} -m ${NS_NET6} &
+	run_cmd nettest -6 -s -A ${MD5_WRONG_PW} -m ${NS_NET6} &
+	sleep 1
+	run_cmd_nsb nettest -6 -r ${NSA_IP6} -A ${MD5_PW}
+	log_test $? 0 "AO: VRF: Prefix config in default VRF and VRF, conn in VRF"
+
+	log_start
+	run_cmd nettest -6 -s -I ${VRF} -A ${MD5_PW} -m ${NS_NET6} &
+	run_cmd nettest -6 -s -A ${MD5_WRONG_PW} -m ${NS_NET6} &
+	sleep 1
+	run_cmd_nsc nettest -6 -r ${NSA_IP6} -A ${MD5_WRONG_PW}
+	log_test $? 0 "AO: VRF: Prefix config in default VRF and VRF, conn in default VRF"
+
+	log_start
+	show_hint "Should timeout since client in default VRF uses VRF password"
+	run_cmd nettest -6 -s -I ${VRF} -A ${MD5_PW} -m ${NS_NET6} &
+	run_cmd nettest -6 -s -A ${MD5_WRONG_PW} -m ${NS_NET6} &
+	sleep 1
+	run_cmd_nsc nettest -6 -r ${NSA_IP6} -A ${MD5_PW}
+	log_test $? 2 "AO: VRF: Prefix config in def VRF and VRF, conn in def VRF with VRF pw"
+
+	log_start
+	show_hint "Should timeout since client in VRF uses default VRF password"
+	run_cmd nettest -6 -s -I ${VRF} -A ${MD5_PW} -m ${NS_NET6} &
+	run_cmd nettest -6 -s -A ${MD5_WRONG_PW} -m ${NS_NET6} &
+	sleep 1
+	run_cmd_nsb nettest -6 -r ${NSA_IP6} -A ${MD5_WRONG_PW}
+	log_test $? 2 "AO: VRF: Prefix config in dev VRF and VRF, conn in VRF with def VRF pw"
+}
+
+only_tcp_authopt()
+{
+	log_section "TCP Authentication Option"
+
+	setup
+	set_sysctl net.ipv4.tcp_l3mdev_accept=0
+	log_subsection "TCP-AO IPv4 no VRF"
+	ipv4_tcp_authopt_novrf
+	log_subsection "TCP-AO IPv6 no VRF"
+	ipv6_tcp_authopt_novrf
+
+	setup "yes"
+	setup_vrf_dup
+	set_sysctl net.ipv4.tcp_l3mdev_accept=0
+	log_subsection "TCP-AO IPv4 VRF"
+	ipv4_tcp_authopt_vrf
+	log_subsection "TCP-AO IPv6 VRF"
+	ipv6_tcp_authopt_vrf
+}
+
 #
 # MD5 tests without VRF
 #
 ipv4_tcp_md5_novrf()
 {
@@ -1215,10 +1535,11 @@  ipv4_tcp_novrf()
 	show_hint "Should fail 'Connection refused'"
 	run_cmd nettest -d ${NSA_DEV} -r ${a}
 	log_test_addr ${a} $? 1 "No server, device client, local conn"
 
 	ipv4_tcp_md5_novrf
+	ipv4_tcp_authopt_novrf
 }
 
 ipv4_tcp_vrf()
 {
 	local a
@@ -1267,13 +1588,14 @@  ipv4_tcp_vrf()
 	run_cmd nettest -s &
 	sleep 1
 	run_cmd nettest -r ${a} -d ${NSA_DEV}
 	log_test_addr ${a} $? 1 "Global server, local connection"
 
-	# run MD5 tests
+	# run MD5+AO tests
 	setup_vrf_dup
 	ipv4_tcp_md5
+	ipv6_tcp_md5_vrf
 	cleanup_vrf_dup
 
 	#
 	# enable VRF global server
 	#
@@ -2748,10 +3070,11 @@  ipv6_tcp_novrf()
 		run_cmd nettest -6 -d ${NSA_DEV} -r ${a}
 		log_test_addr ${a} $? 1 "No server, device client, local conn"
 	done
 
 	ipv6_tcp_md5_novrf
+	ipv6_tcp_authopt_novrf
 }
 
 ipv6_tcp_vrf()
 {
 	local a
@@ -2816,13 +3139,14 @@  ipv6_tcp_vrf()
 	run_cmd nettest -6 -s &
 	sleep 1
 	run_cmd nettest -6 -r ${a} -d ${NSA_DEV}
 	log_test_addr ${a} $? 1 "Global server, local connection"
 
-	# run MD5 tests
+	# run MD5+AO tests
 	setup_vrf_dup
 	ipv6_tcp_md5
+	ipv6_tcp_authopt_vrf
 	cleanup_vrf_dup
 
 	#
 	# enable VRF global server
 	#
@@ -4191,10 +4515,11 @@  do
 	ipv6_bind|bind6) ipv6_addr_bind;;
 	ipv6_runtime)    ipv6_runtime;;
 	ipv6_netfilter)  ipv6_netfilter;;
 
 	use_cases)       use_cases;;
+	tcp_authopt)     only_tcp_authopt;;
 
 	# setup namespaces and config, but do not run any tests
 	setup)		 setup; exit 0;;
 	vrf_setup)	 setup "yes"; exit 0;;
 	esac