diff mbox

[2/3] dmaengine: qcom_hidma: add support for the new revision

Message ID 1509989180-22617-2-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Headers show

Commit Message

Sinan Kaya Nov. 6, 2017, 5:26 p.m. UTC
Add support for probing the newer HW.

Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

Comments

Robin Murphy Nov. 6, 2017, 6:03 p.m. UTC | #1
On 06/11/17 17:26, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> Add support for probing the newer HW.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c b/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c
> index e366985..29d6aaa 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c
> @@ -749,9 +749,13 @@ static bool hidma_msi_capable(struct device *dev)
>  			return false;
>  
>  		ret = strcmp(of_compat, "qcom,hidma-1.1");
> +		if (ret)
> +			ret = strcmp(of_compat, "qcom,hidma-1.2");
>  	} else {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>  		ret = strcmp(acpi_device_hid(adev), "QCOM8062");
> +		if (ret)
> +			ret = strcmp(acpi_device_hid(adev), "QCOM8063");

This string-juggling looks to have already hit the point at which it
doesn't scale well - it would be a lot nicer to make use of
of_device_get_match_data() and the ACPI equivalent to abstract the
version-specific data appropriately.

Robin.

>  #endif
>  	}
>  	return ret == 0;
> @@ -954,6 +958,7 @@ static int hidma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  static const struct acpi_device_id hidma_acpi_ids[] = {
>  	{"QCOM8061"},
>  	{"QCOM8062"},
> +	{"QCOM8063"},
>  	{},
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, hidma_acpi_ids);
> @@ -962,6 +967,7 @@ static int hidma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  static const struct of_device_id hidma_match[] = {
>  	{.compatible = "qcom,hidma-1.0",},
>  	{.compatible = "qcom,hidma-1.1",},
> +	{.compatible = "qcom,hidma-1.2",},
>  	{},
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, hidma_match);
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Sinan Kaya Nov. 6, 2017, 6:15 p.m. UTC | #2
On 11/6/2017 1:03 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>>  		ret = strcmp(acpi_device_hid(adev), "QCOM8062");
>> +		if (ret)
>> +			ret = strcmp(acpi_device_hid(adev), "QCOM8063");
> This string-juggling looks to have already hit the point at which it
> doesn't scale well - it would be a lot nicer to make use of
> of_device_get_match_data() and the ACPI equivalent to abstract the
> version-specific data appropriately.

Sure, let me do some research.
Sinan Kaya Nov. 6, 2017, 10:09 p.m. UTC | #3
On 11/6/2017 1:15 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 11/6/2017 1:03 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>>  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>>>  		ret = strcmp(acpi_device_hid(adev), "QCOM8062");
>>> +		if (ret)
>>> +			ret = strcmp(acpi_device_hid(adev), "QCOM8063");
>> This string-juggling looks to have already hit the point at which it
>> doesn't scale well - it would be a lot nicer to make use of
>> of_device_get_match_data() and the ACPI equivalent to abstract the
>> version-specific data appropriately.
> 
> Sure, let me do some research.
> 

I just wanted to double check here. 

This is what I can do:
1. Maintain different match tables for different driver capabilities.
2. Instead of doing open-coded strcmp, I can do match against different tables
using acpi_match_device/of_match_device.

Hope this works for you.
Vinod Koul Nov. 8, 2017, 5:47 a.m. UTC | #4
On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 05:09:29PM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 11/6/2017 1:15 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> > On 11/6/2017 1:03 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> >>>  #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> >>>  		ret = strcmp(acpi_device_hid(adev), "QCOM8062");
> >>> +		if (ret)
> >>> +			ret = strcmp(acpi_device_hid(adev), "QCOM8063");
> >> This string-juggling looks to have already hit the point at which it
> >> doesn't scale well - it would be a lot nicer to make use of
> >> of_device_get_match_data() and the ACPI equivalent to abstract the
> >> version-specific data appropriately.
> > 
> > Sure, let me do some research.
> > 
> 
> I just wanted to double check here. 
> 
> This is what I can do:
> 1. Maintain different match tables for different driver capabilities.
> 2. Instead of doing open-coded strcmp, I can do match against different tables
> using acpi_match_device/of_match_device.
> 
> Hope this works for you.

Sounds better to me. You should have common match where capabilities are
same.
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c b/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c
index e366985..29d6aaa 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/qcom/hidma.c
@@ -749,9 +749,13 @@  static bool hidma_msi_capable(struct device *dev)
 			return false;
 
 		ret = strcmp(of_compat, "qcom,hidma-1.1");
+		if (ret)
+			ret = strcmp(of_compat, "qcom,hidma-1.2");
 	} else {
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
 		ret = strcmp(acpi_device_hid(adev), "QCOM8062");
+		if (ret)
+			ret = strcmp(acpi_device_hid(adev), "QCOM8063");
 #endif
 	}
 	return ret == 0;
@@ -954,6 +958,7 @@  static int hidma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 static const struct acpi_device_id hidma_acpi_ids[] = {
 	{"QCOM8061"},
 	{"QCOM8062"},
+	{"QCOM8063"},
 	{},
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, hidma_acpi_ids);
@@ -962,6 +967,7 @@  static int hidma_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 static const struct of_device_id hidma_match[] = {
 	{.compatible = "qcom,hidma-1.0",},
 	{.compatible = "qcom,hidma-1.1",},
+	{.compatible = "qcom,hidma-1.2",},
 	{},
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, hidma_match);