@@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ static void k3_dma_fill_desc(struct k3_dma_desc_sw *ds, dma_addr_t dst,
ds->desc_hw[num].config = ccfg;
}
-static struct k3_dma_desc_sw *k3_dma_alloc_desc_resource(int num,
+static struct k3_dma_desc_sw *k3_dma_alloc_desc_resource(size_t num,
struct dma_chan *chan)
{
struct k3_dma_chan *c = to_k3_chan(chan);
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ static struct k3_dma_desc_sw *k3_dma_alloc_desc_resource(int num,
int lli_limit = LLI_BLOCK_SIZE / sizeof(struct k3_desc_hw);
if (num > lli_limit) {
- dev_dbg(chan->device->dev, "vch %p: sg num %d exceed max %d\n",
+ dev_dbg(chan->device->dev, "vch %p: sg num %lu exceed max %d\n",
&c->vc, num, lli_limit);
return NULL;
}
@@ -476,7 +476,7 @@ static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *k3_dma_prep_memcpy(
struct k3_dma_chan *c = to_k3_chan(chan);
struct k3_dma_desc_sw *ds;
size_t copy = 0;
- int num = 0;
+ size_t num = 0;
if (!len)
return NULL;
My static checker complains that it's possible for "num" to be negative. I haven't investigated this completely, but it's more natural to make the type unsigned and that makes the static checker happy. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> --- Hm... I probably should investigate this a bit more because the same code is copy and pasted all over the place. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html