Message ID | 20161016122547.11478-1-colin.king@canonical.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 01:25:47PM +0100, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> > > Just iterate over the number of elements in array chanerr_str rather > than for all 32 bits. This removes the need for a NULL chanerr_str[i] > check which could possibly overrun if the upper bits (28..31) of > chanerr are set and 27th bit in chanerr is zero. This simplifies the > code by removing an if statement and a break. Applied, thanks
diff --git a/drivers/dma/ioat/dma.c b/drivers/dma/ioat/dma.c index 49386ce0..42ff307 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/ioat/dma.c +++ b/drivers/dma/ioat/dma.c @@ -66,7 +66,6 @@ static char *chanerr_str[] = { "Result Guard Tag verification Error", "Result Application Tag verification Error", "Result Reference Tag verification Error", - NULL }; static void ioat_eh(struct ioatdma_chan *ioat_chan); @@ -75,13 +74,10 @@ static void ioat_print_chanerrs(struct ioatdma_chan *ioat_chan, u32 chanerr) { int i; - for (i = 0; i < 32; i++) { + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(chanerr_str); i++) { if ((chanerr >> i) & 1) { - if (chanerr_str[i]) { - dev_err(to_dev(ioat_chan), "Err(%d): %s\n", - i, chanerr_str[i]); - } else - break; + dev_err(to_dev(ioat_chan), "Err(%d): %s\n", + i, chanerr_str[i]); } } }