Message ID | 20181222043445.GA29462@home.buserror.net (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Headers | show |
Series | dmaengine: fsldma: Add 64-bit I/O accessors for powerpc64 | expand |
Hi Scott, You are right, we should support powerpc64, so could I changed it as fallows: diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsldma.h b/drivers/dma/fsldma.h index 88db939..057babf 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/fsldma.h +++ b/drivers/dma/fsldma.h @@ -202,35 +202,10 @@ struct fsldma_chan { #define fsl_iowrite32(v, p) out_le32(p, v) #define fsl_iowrite32be(v, p) out_be32(p, v) -#ifndef __powerpc64__ -static u64 fsl_ioread64(const u64 __iomem *addr) -{ - u32 fsl_addr = lower_32_bits(addr); - u64 fsl_addr_hi = (u64)in_le32((u32 *)(fsl_addr + 1)) << 32; - - return fsl_addr_hi | in_le32((u32 *)fsl_addr); -} - -static void fsl_iowrite64(u64 val, u64 __iomem *addr) -{ - out_le32((u32 __iomem *)addr + 1, val >> 32); - out_le32((u32 __iomem *)addr, (u32)val); -} - -static u64 fsl_ioread64be(const u64 __iomem *addr) -{ - u32 fsl_addr = lower_32_bits(addr); - u64 fsl_addr_hi = (u64)in_be32((u32 *)fsl_addr) << 32; - - return fsl_addr_hi | in_be32((u32 *)(fsl_addr + 1)); -} - -static void fsl_iowrite64be(u64 val, u64 __iomem *addr) -{ - out_be32((u32 __iomem *)addr, val >> 32); - out_be32((u32 __iomem *)addr + 1, (u32)val); -} -#endif +#define fsl_ioread64(p) in_le64(p) +#define fsl_ioread64be(p) in_be64(p) +#define fsl_iowrite64(v, p) out_le64(p, v) +#define fsl_iowrite64be(v, p) out_be64(p, v) #endif Best Regards, Peng >-----Original Message----- >From: Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net> >Sent: 2018年12月22日 12:35 >To: Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>; Zhang Wei <zw@zh-kernel.org> >Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; dmaengine@vger.kernel.org; Peng Ma ><peng.ma@nxp.com>; Wen He <wen.he_1@nxp.com> >Subject: [PATCH] dmaengine: fsldma: Add 64-bit I/O accessors for powerpc64 > >Otherwise 64-bit PPC builds fail with undefined references to these accessors. > >Cc: Peng Ma <peng.ma@nxp.com> >Cc: Wen He <wen.he_1@nxp.com> >Fixes: 68997fff94afa (" dmaengine: fsldma: Adding macro FSL_DMA_IN/OUT >implement for ARM platform") >Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net> >--- >Is there any reason why ioreadXXbe() etc can't be used on PPC as well? > > drivers/dma/fsldma.h | 7 ++++++- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsldma.h b/drivers/dma/fsldma.h index >88db939c04a1..a9b12f82b5c3 100644 >--- a/drivers/dma/fsldma.h >+++ b/drivers/dma/fsldma.h >@@ -202,7 +202,12 @@ struct fsldma_chan { > #define fsl_iowrite32(v, p) out_le32(p, v) > #define fsl_iowrite32be(v, p) out_be32(p, v) > >-#ifndef __powerpc64__ >+#ifdef __powerpc64__ >+#define fsl_ioread64(p) in_le64(p) >+#define fsl_ioread64be(p) in_be64(p) >+#define fsl_iowrite64(v, p) out_le64(p, v) >+#define fsl_iowrite64be(v, p) out_be64(p, v) >+#else > static u64 fsl_ioread64(const u64 __iomem *addr) { > u32 fsl_addr = lower_32_bits(addr); >-- >2.17.1
On Mon, 2018-12-24 at 03:42 +0000, Peng Ma wrote: > Hi Scott, > > You are right, we should support powerpc64, so could I changed it as > fallows: > > diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsldma.h b/drivers/dma/fsldma.h > index 88db939..057babf 100644 > --- a/drivers/dma/fsldma.h > +++ b/drivers/dma/fsldma.h > @@ -202,35 +202,10 @@ struct fsldma_chan { > #define fsl_iowrite32(v, p) out_le32(p, v) > #define fsl_iowrite32be(v, p) out_be32(p, v) > > -#ifndef __powerpc64__ > -static u64 fsl_ioread64(const u64 __iomem *addr) > -{ > - u32 fsl_addr = lower_32_bits(addr); > - u64 fsl_addr_hi = (u64)in_le32((u32 *)(fsl_addr + 1)) << 32; > - > - return fsl_addr_hi | in_le32((u32 *)fsl_addr); > -} > - > -static void fsl_iowrite64(u64 val, u64 __iomem *addr) > -{ > - out_le32((u32 __iomem *)addr + 1, val >> 32); > - out_le32((u32 __iomem *)addr, (u32)val); > -} > - > -static u64 fsl_ioread64be(const u64 __iomem *addr) > -{ > - u32 fsl_addr = lower_32_bits(addr); > - u64 fsl_addr_hi = (u64)in_be32((u32 *)fsl_addr) << 32; > - > - return fsl_addr_hi | in_be32((u32 *)(fsl_addr + 1)); > -} > - > -static void fsl_iowrite64be(u64 val, u64 __iomem *addr) > -{ > - out_be32((u32 __iomem *)addr, val >> 32); > - out_be32((u32 __iomem *)addr + 1, (u32)val); > -} > -#endif > +#define fsl_ioread64(p) in_le64(p) > +#define fsl_ioread64be(p) in_be64(p) > +#define fsl_iowrite64(v, p) out_le64(p, v) > +#define fsl_iowrite64be(v, p) out_be64(p, v) > #endif Then you'll break 32-bit, assuming those fake-it-with-two-32-bit-accesses were actually needed. -Scott
Hi Scott, Oh, I did not see the in_XX64/out_XX64 supported only __powerpc64__ just now. Thanks for your reminder. #ifdef __powerpc64__ #ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN__ DEF_MMIO_OUT_D(out_be64, 64, std); DEF_MMIO_IN_D(in_be64, 64, ld); /* There is no asm instructions for 64 bits reverse loads and stores */ static inline u64 in_le64(const volatile u64 __iomem *addr) { return swab64(in_be64(addr)); } static inline void out_le64(volatile u64 __iomem *addr, u64 val) { out_be64(addr, swab64(val)); } #else DEF_MMIO_OUT_D(out_le64, 64, std); DEF_MMIO_IN_D(in_le64, 64, ld); /* There is no asm instructions for 64 bits reverse loads and stores */ static inline u64 in_be64(const volatile u64 __iomem *addr) { return swab64(in_le64(addr)); } static inline void out_be64(volatile u64 __iomem *addr, u64 val) { out_le64(addr, swab64(val)); } #endif #endif /* __powerpc64__ */ Best Regards, Peng >-----Original Message----- >From: Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net> >Sent: 2018年12月24日 12:46 >To: Peng Ma <peng.ma@nxp.com>; Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>; Zhang Wei ><zw@zh-kernel.org> >Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; dmaengine@vger.kernel.org; Wen He ><wen.he_1@nxp.com> >Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: fsldma: Add 64-bit I/O accessors for >powerpc64 > >On Mon, 2018-12-24 at 03:42 +0000, Peng Ma wrote: >> Hi Scott, >> >> You are right, we should support powerpc64, so could I changed it as >> fallows: >> >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsldma.h b/drivers/dma/fsldma.h index >> 88db939..057babf 100644 >> --- a/drivers/dma/fsldma.h >> +++ b/drivers/dma/fsldma.h >> @@ -202,35 +202,10 @@ struct fsldma_chan { >> #define fsl_iowrite32(v, p) out_le32(p, v) >> #define fsl_iowrite32be(v, p) out_be32(p, v) >> >> -#ifndef __powerpc64__ >> -static u64 fsl_ioread64(const u64 __iomem *addr) -{ >> - u32 fsl_addr = lower_32_bits(addr); >> - u64 fsl_addr_hi = (u64)in_le32((u32 *)(fsl_addr + 1)) << 32; >> - >> - return fsl_addr_hi | in_le32((u32 *)fsl_addr); >> -} >> - >> -static void fsl_iowrite64(u64 val, u64 __iomem *addr) -{ >> - out_le32((u32 __iomem *)addr + 1, val >> 32); >> - out_le32((u32 __iomem *)addr, (u32)val); >> -} >> - >> -static u64 fsl_ioread64be(const u64 __iomem *addr) -{ >> - u32 fsl_addr = lower_32_bits(addr); >> - u64 fsl_addr_hi = (u64)in_be32((u32 *)fsl_addr) << 32; >> - >> - return fsl_addr_hi | in_be32((u32 *)(fsl_addr + 1)); >> -} >> - >> -static void fsl_iowrite64be(u64 val, u64 __iomem *addr) -{ >> - out_be32((u32 __iomem *)addr, val >> 32); >> - out_be32((u32 __iomem *)addr + 1, (u32)val); >> -} >> -#endif >> +#define fsl_ioread64(p) in_le64(p) >> +#define fsl_ioread64be(p) in_be64(p) >> +#define fsl_iowrite64(v, p) out_le64(p, v) >> +#define fsl_iowrite64be(v, p) out_be64(p, v) >> #endif > >Then you'll break 32-bit, assuming those fake-it-with-two-32-bit-accesses >were actually needed. > >-Scott >
On 24-12-18, 05:29, Peng Ma wrote: > Hi Scott, > > Oh, I did not see the in_XX64/out_XX64 supported only __powerpc64__ just now. > Thanks for your reminder. Can you send the formal patch for this... FWIW, fsl patches were not merged last cycle because of reported regression... > > #ifdef __powerpc64__ > > #ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN__ > DEF_MMIO_OUT_D(out_be64, 64, std); > DEF_MMIO_IN_D(in_be64, 64, ld); > > /* There is no asm instructions for 64 bits reverse loads and stores */ > static inline u64 in_le64(const volatile u64 __iomem *addr) > { > return swab64(in_be64(addr)); > } > > static inline void out_le64(volatile u64 __iomem *addr, u64 val) > { > out_be64(addr, swab64(val)); > } > #else > DEF_MMIO_OUT_D(out_le64, 64, std); > DEF_MMIO_IN_D(in_le64, 64, ld); > > /* There is no asm instructions for 64 bits reverse loads and stores */ > static inline u64 in_be64(const volatile u64 __iomem *addr) > { > return swab64(in_le64(addr)); > } > > static inline void out_be64(volatile u64 __iomem *addr, u64 val) > { > out_le64(addr, swab64(val)); > } > > #endif > #endif /* __powerpc64__ */ > > Best Regards, > Peng > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net> > >Sent: 2018年12月24日 12:46 > >To: Peng Ma <peng.ma@nxp.com>; Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>; Zhang Wei > ><zw@zh-kernel.org> > >Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; dmaengine@vger.kernel.org; Wen He > ><wen.he_1@nxp.com> > >Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: fsldma: Add 64-bit I/O accessors for > >powerpc64 > > > >On Mon, 2018-12-24 at 03:42 +0000, Peng Ma wrote: > >> Hi Scott, > >> > >> You are right, we should support powerpc64, so could I changed it as > >> fallows: > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsldma.h b/drivers/dma/fsldma.h index > >> 88db939..057babf 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/dma/fsldma.h > >> +++ b/drivers/dma/fsldma.h > >> @@ -202,35 +202,10 @@ struct fsldma_chan { > >> #define fsl_iowrite32(v, p) out_le32(p, v) > >> #define fsl_iowrite32be(v, p) out_be32(p, v) > >> > >> -#ifndef __powerpc64__ > >> -static u64 fsl_ioread64(const u64 __iomem *addr) -{ > >> - u32 fsl_addr = lower_32_bits(addr); > >> - u64 fsl_addr_hi = (u64)in_le32((u32 *)(fsl_addr + 1)) << 32; > >> - > >> - return fsl_addr_hi | in_le32((u32 *)fsl_addr); > >> -} > >> - > >> -static void fsl_iowrite64(u64 val, u64 __iomem *addr) -{ > >> - out_le32((u32 __iomem *)addr + 1, val >> 32); > >> - out_le32((u32 __iomem *)addr, (u32)val); > >> -} > >> - > >> -static u64 fsl_ioread64be(const u64 __iomem *addr) -{ > >> - u32 fsl_addr = lower_32_bits(addr); > >> - u64 fsl_addr_hi = (u64)in_be32((u32 *)fsl_addr) << 32; > >> - > >> - return fsl_addr_hi | in_be32((u32 *)(fsl_addr + 1)); > >> -} > >> - > >> -static void fsl_iowrite64be(u64 val, u64 __iomem *addr) -{ > >> - out_be32((u32 __iomem *)addr, val >> 32); > >> - out_be32((u32 __iomem *)addr + 1, (u32)val); > >> -} > >> -#endif > >> +#define fsl_ioread64(p) in_le64(p) > >> +#define fsl_ioread64be(p) in_be64(p) > >> +#define fsl_iowrite64(v, p) out_le64(p, v) > >> +#define fsl_iowrite64be(v, p) out_be64(p, v) > >> #endif > > > >Then you'll break 32-bit, assuming those fake-it-with-two-32-bit-accesses > >were actually needed. > > > >-Scott > > >
Hi Vinod, Sorry to replay late. 1:This patch has already send to the patchwork. Please see the patch link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10741521/ 2:I have already compile the fsl patches on arm and powerpc after patched https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10741521/ The compile will successful, please let me know the reported regression results, thanks very much. Best Regards, Peng >-----Original Message----- >From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> >Sent: 2019年1月19日 20:59 >To: Peng Ma <peng.ma@nxp.com> >Cc: Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net>; Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>; Zhang Wei ><zw@zh-kernel.org>; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; >dmaengine@vger.kernel.org; Wen He <wen.he_1@nxp.com> >Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: fsldma: Add 64-bit I/O accessors for >powerpc64 > >On 24-12-18, 05:29, Peng Ma wrote: >> Hi Scott, >> >> Oh, I did not see the in_XX64/out_XX64 supported only __powerpc64__ just >now. >> Thanks for your reminder. > >Can you send the formal patch for this... > >FWIW, fsl patches were not merged last cycle because of reported regression... > >> >> #ifdef __powerpc64__ >> >> #ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN__ >> DEF_MMIO_OUT_D(out_be64, 64, std); >> DEF_MMIO_IN_D(in_be64, 64, ld); >> >> /* There is no asm instructions for 64 bits reverse loads and stores >> */ static inline u64 in_le64(const volatile u64 __iomem *addr) { >> return swab64(in_be64(addr)); >> } >> >> static inline void out_le64(volatile u64 __iomem *addr, u64 val) { >> out_be64(addr, swab64(val)); >> } >> #else >> DEF_MMIO_OUT_D(out_le64, 64, std); >> DEF_MMIO_IN_D(in_le64, 64, ld); >> >> /* There is no asm instructions for 64 bits reverse loads and stores >> */ static inline u64 in_be64(const volatile u64 __iomem *addr) { >> return swab64(in_le64(addr)); >> } >> >> static inline void out_be64(volatile u64 __iomem *addr, u64 val) { >> out_le64(addr, swab64(val)); >> } >> >> #endif >> #endif /* __powerpc64__ */ >> >> Best Regards, >> Peng >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net> >> >Sent: 2018年12月24日 12:46 >> >To: Peng Ma <peng.ma@nxp.com>; Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>; Zhang >Wei >> ><zw@zh-kernel.org> >> >Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; dmaengine@vger.kernel.org; Wen He >> ><wen.he_1@nxp.com> >> >Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: fsldma: Add 64-bit I/O accessors for >> >powerpc64 >> > >> >On Mon, 2018-12-24 at 03:42 +0000, Peng Ma wrote: >> >> Hi Scott, >> >> >> >> You are right, we should support powerpc64, so could I changed it >> >> as >> >> fallows: >> >> >> >> diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsldma.h b/drivers/dma/fsldma.h index >> >> 88db939..057babf 100644 >> >> --- a/drivers/dma/fsldma.h >> >> +++ b/drivers/dma/fsldma.h >> >> @@ -202,35 +202,10 @@ struct fsldma_chan { >> >> #define fsl_iowrite32(v, p) out_le32(p, v) >> >> #define fsl_iowrite32be(v, p) out_be32(p, v) >> >> >> >> -#ifndef __powerpc64__ >> >> -static u64 fsl_ioread64(const u64 __iomem *addr) -{ >> >> - u32 fsl_addr = lower_32_bits(addr); >> >> - u64 fsl_addr_hi = (u64)in_le32((u32 *)(fsl_addr + 1)) << 32; >> >> - >> >> - return fsl_addr_hi | in_le32((u32 *)fsl_addr); >> >> -} >> >> - >> >> -static void fsl_iowrite64(u64 val, u64 __iomem *addr) -{ >> >> - out_le32((u32 __iomem *)addr + 1, val >> 32); >> >> - out_le32((u32 __iomem *)addr, (u32)val); >> >> -} >> >> - >> >> -static u64 fsl_ioread64be(const u64 __iomem *addr) -{ >> >> - u32 fsl_addr = lower_32_bits(addr); >> >> - u64 fsl_addr_hi = (u64)in_be32((u32 *)fsl_addr) << 32; >> >> - >> >> - return fsl_addr_hi | in_be32((u32 *)(fsl_addr + 1)); >> >> -} >> >> - >> >> -static void fsl_iowrite64be(u64 val, u64 __iomem *addr) -{ >> >> - out_be32((u32 __iomem *)addr, val >> 32); >> >> - out_be32((u32 __iomem *)addr + 1, (u32)val); >> >> -} >> >> -#endif >> >> +#define fsl_ioread64(p) in_le64(p) >> >> +#define fsl_ioread64be(p) in_be64(p) >> >> +#define fsl_iowrite64(v, p) out_le64(p, v) >> >> +#define fsl_iowrite64be(v, p) out_be64(p, v) >> >> #endif >> > >> >Then you'll break 32-bit, assuming those >> >fake-it-with-two-32-bit-accesses were actually needed. >> > >> >-Scott >> > >> > >-- >~Vinod
On 25-01-19, 05:54, Peng Ma wrote: > Hi Vinod, > > Sorry to replay late. > 1:This patch has already send to the patchwork. > Please see the patch link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10741521/ > 2:I have already compile the fsl patches on arm and powerpc after patched https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10741521/ > The compile will successful, please let me know the reported regression results, thanks very much. And I thought there were further comments on this patch. I have applied this, please watch for failures reported if any..
Hi Vinod, Got it. Best Regards Peng >-----Original Message----- >From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> >Sent: 2019年2月4日 15:28 >To: Peng Ma <peng.ma@nxp.com> >Cc: Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net>; Leo Li <leoyang.li@nxp.com>; Zhang Wei ><zw@zh-kernel.org>; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; >dmaengine@vger.kernel.org; Wen He <wen.he_1@nxp.com> >Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: fsldma: Add 64-bit I/O accessors for >powerpc64 > >On 25-01-19, 05:54, Peng Ma wrote: >> Hi Vinod, >> >> Sorry to replay late. >> 1:This patch has already send to the patchwork. >> Please see the patch link: >> https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpat >> >chwork.kernel.org%2Fpatch%2F10741521%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cpeng. >ma%40n >> >xp.com%7C5d169e9bc5684a9d14c008d68a727589%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92 >cd99c5c >> >301635%7C0%7C0%7C636848621546833095&sdata=q1sTaC%2F4SqEtM >yFymzyvXe >> qBOhCnBjyMcjPz8A9QRI4%3D&reserved=0 >> 2:I have already compile the fsl patches on arm and powerpc after patched >https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpatch >work.kernel.org%2Fpatch%2F10741521%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cpeng.ma >%40nxp.com%7C5d169e9bc5684a9d14c008d68a727589%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c >6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636848621546833095&sdata=q1sTa >C%2F4SqEtMyFymzyvXeqBOhCnBjyMcjPz8A9QRI4%3D&reserved=0 >> The compile will successful, please let me know the reported regression >results, thanks very much. > >And I thought there were further comments on this patch. I have applied this, >please watch for failures reported if any.. >-- >~Vinod
diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsldma.h b/drivers/dma/fsldma.h index 88db939c04a1..a9b12f82b5c3 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/fsldma.h +++ b/drivers/dma/fsldma.h @@ -202,7 +202,12 @@ struct fsldma_chan { #define fsl_iowrite32(v, p) out_le32(p, v) #define fsl_iowrite32be(v, p) out_be32(p, v) -#ifndef __powerpc64__ +#ifdef __powerpc64__ +#define fsl_ioread64(p) in_le64(p) +#define fsl_ioread64be(p) in_be64(p) +#define fsl_iowrite64(v, p) out_le64(p, v) +#define fsl_iowrite64be(v, p) out_be64(p, v) +#else static u64 fsl_ioread64(const u64 __iomem *addr) { u32 fsl_addr = lower_32_bits(addr);
Otherwise 64-bit PPC builds fail with undefined references to these accessors. Cc: Peng Ma <peng.ma@nxp.com> Cc: Wen He <wen.he_1@nxp.com> Fixes: 68997fff94afa (" dmaengine: fsldma: Adding macro FSL_DMA_IN/OUT implement for ARM platform") Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <oss@buserror.net> --- Is there any reason why ioreadXXbe() etc can't be used on PPC as well? drivers/dma/fsldma.h | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)