diff mbox series

[v1,1/6] dmaengine: dmatest: Fix iteration non-stop logic

Message ID 20200424161147.16895-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Headers show
Series [v1,1/6] dmaengine: dmatest: Fix iteration non-stop logic | expand

Commit Message

Andy Shevchenko April 24, 2020, 4:11 p.m. UTC
Under some circumstances, i.e. when test is still running and about to
time out and user runs, for example,

	grep -H . /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/*

the iterations parameter is not respected and test is going on and on until
user gives

	echo 0 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/run

This is not what expected.

The history of this bug is interesting. I though that the commit
  2d88ce76eb98 ("dmatest: add a 'wait' parameter")
is a culprit, but looking closer to the code I think it simple revealed the
broken logic from the day one, i.e. in the commit
  0a2ff57d6fba ("dmaengine: dmatest: add a maximum number of test iterations")
which adds iterations parameter.

So, to the point, the conditional of checking the thread to be stopped being
first part of conjunction logic prevents to check iterations. Thus, we have to
always check both conditions to be able to stop after given iterations.

Since it wasn't visible before second commit appeared, I add a respective
Fixes tag.

Fixes: 2d88ce76eb98 ("dmatest: add a 'wait' parameter")
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/dma/dmatest.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Nicolas Ferre April 27, 2020, 8:09 a.m. UTC | #1
Andy,

On 24/04/2020 at 18:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Under some circumstances, i.e. when test is still running and about to
> time out and user runs, for example,
> 
>          grep -H . /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/*
> 
> the iterations parameter is not respected and test is going on and on until
> user gives
> 
>          echo 0 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/run
> 
> This is not what expected.
> 
> The history of this bug is interesting. I though that the commit
>    2d88ce76eb98 ("dmatest: add a 'wait' parameter")
> is a culprit, but looking closer to the code I think it simple revealed the
> broken logic from the day one, i.e. in the commit
>    0a2ff57d6fba ("dmaengine: dmatest: add a maximum number of test iterations")
> which adds iterations parameter.
> 
> So, to the point, the conditional of checking the thread to be stopped being
> first part of conjunction logic prevents to check iterations. Thus, we have to
> always check both conditions to be able to stop after given iterations.
> 
> Since it wasn't visible before second commit appeared, I add a respective
> Fixes tag.
> 
> Fixes: 2d88ce76eb98 ("dmatest: add a 'wait' parameter")
> Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>

Yes, makes sense indeed:
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>


> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/dma/dmatest.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmatest.c b/drivers/dma/dmatest.c
> index a2cadfa2e6d78..4993e3e5c5b01 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dmatest.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dmatest.c
> @@ -662,8 +662,8 @@ static int dmatest_func(void *data)
>                  flags = DMA_CTRL_ACK | DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT;
> 
>          ktime = ktime_get();
> -       while (!kthread_should_stop()
> -              && !(params->iterations && total_tests >= params->iterations)) {
> +       while (!(kthread_should_stop() ||
> +              (params->iterations && total_tests >= params->iterations))) {
>                  struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx = NULL;
>                  struct dmaengine_unmap_data *um;
>                  dma_addr_t *dsts;
> --
> 2.26.2
>
Vinod Koul April 27, 2020, 4:16 p.m. UTC | #2
On 24-04-20, 19:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Under some circumstances, i.e. when test is still running and about to
> time out and user runs, for example,
> 
> 	grep -H . /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/*
> 
> the iterations parameter is not respected and test is going on and on until
> user gives
> 
> 	echo 0 > /sys/module/dmatest/parameters/run
> 
> This is not what expected.
> 
> The history of this bug is interesting. I though that the commit
>   2d88ce76eb98 ("dmatest: add a 'wait' parameter")
> is a culprit, but looking closer to the code I think it simple revealed the
> broken logic from the day one, i.e. in the commit
>   0a2ff57d6fba ("dmaengine: dmatest: add a maximum number of test iterations")
> which adds iterations parameter.
> 
> So, to the point, the conditional of checking the thread to be stopped being
> first part of conjunction logic prevents to check iterations. Thus, we have to
> always check both conditions to be able to stop after given iterations.
> 
> Since it wasn't visible before second commit appeared, I add a respective
> Fixes tag.

Applied, thanks
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmatest.c b/drivers/dma/dmatest.c
index a2cadfa2e6d78..4993e3e5c5b01 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dmatest.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/dmatest.c
@@ -662,8 +662,8 @@  static int dmatest_func(void *data)
 		flags = DMA_CTRL_ACK | DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT;
 
 	ktime = ktime_get();
-	while (!kthread_should_stop()
-	       && !(params->iterations && total_tests >= params->iterations)) {
+	while (!(kthread_should_stop() ||
+	       (params->iterations && total_tests >= params->iterations))) {
 		struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *tx = NULL;
 		struct dmaengine_unmap_data *um;
 		dma_addr_t *dsts;