From patchwork Tue May 3 22:50:50 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Serge Semin X-Patchwork-Id: 12836531 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 777F3C43217 for ; Tue, 3 May 2022 23:01:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230337AbiECXE7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 May 2022 19:04:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51640 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S244200AbiECXEL (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 May 2022 19:04:11 -0400 Received: from mail.baikalelectronics.ru (mail.baikalelectronics.com [87.245.175.226]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FBC913D24 for ; Tue, 3 May 2022 16:00:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.baikalelectronics.ru (unknown [192.168.51.25]) by mail.baikalelectronics.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE98DC00; Wed, 4 May 2022 01:51:58 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mail.baikalelectronics.ru AE98DC00 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=baikalelectronics.ru; s=mail; t=1651618318; bh=v2tYJrYiAEbZtvDvSvss7D+P15mGrAxcXJq7ntJIjc0=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=XFuY/ynA9ih96fFpK11sgyGOo+RKyt9pNkmPM3HBy6Kq5DXTbVZbgpuZku2fF3+wE sTC+pxrWJmKNxM8EOnI6hgvZz29SIUjwvBmkMR1Dk7pAtybPzHkqgfwm727utTPNdV bPnHY/x7XZwRTAeP197JMMtQK7IWmvrybzO8HtAA= Received: from localhost (192.168.53.207) by mail (192.168.51.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1395.4; Wed, 4 May 2022 01:51:24 +0300 From: Serge Semin To: Gustavo Pimentel , Vinod Koul , Jingoo Han , Bjorn Helgaas , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Frank Li , Manivannan Sadhasivam CC: Serge Semin , Serge Semin , Alexey Malahov , Pavel Parkhomenko , Rob Herring , =?utf-8?q?Krzysztof_Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , , , Subject: [PATCH v2 12/26] dmaengine: dw-edma: Stop checking debugfs_create_*() return value Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 01:50:50 +0300 Message-ID: <20220503225104.12108-13-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> In-Reply-To: <20220503225104.12108-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> References: <20220503225104.12108-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ClientProxiedBy: MAIL.baikal.int (192.168.51.25) To mail (192.168.51.25) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: dmaengine@vger.kernel.org First of all they never return NULL. So checking their return value for being not NULL just pointless. Secondly the DebugFS subsystem is designed in a way to be used as simple as possible. So if one of the debugfs_create_*() method in a hierarchy fails, the following methods will just silently return the passed erroneous parental dentry. Finally the code is supposed to be working no matter whether anything DebugFS-related fails. So in order to make code simpler and DebugFS-independent let's drop the debugfs_create_*() methods return value checking in the same way as the most of the kernel drivers do. Note in order to preserve some memory space we suggest to skip the DebugFS nodes initialization if the file system in unavailable. Signed-off-by: Serge Semin Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam --- drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c | 20 +++++--------------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c index 8e61810dea4b..6e7f3ef60ca7 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-v0-debugfs.c @@ -100,9 +100,8 @@ static void dw_edma_debugfs_create_x32(const struct debugfs_entries entries[], int i; for (i = 0; i < nr_entries; i++) { - if (!debugfs_create_file_unsafe(entries[i].name, 0444, dir, - entries[i].reg, &fops_x32)) - break; + debugfs_create_file_unsafe(entries[i].name, 0444, dir, + entries[i].reg, &fops_x32); } } @@ -168,8 +167,6 @@ static void dw_edma_debugfs_regs_wr(struct dentry *dir) char name[16]; regs_dir = debugfs_create_dir(WRITE_STR, dir); - if (!regs_dir) - return; nr_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(debugfs_regs); dw_edma_debugfs_create_x32(debugfs_regs, nr_entries, regs_dir); @@ -184,8 +181,6 @@ static void dw_edma_debugfs_regs_wr(struct dentry *dir) snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%s:%d", CHANNEL_STR, i); ch_dir = debugfs_create_dir(name, regs_dir); - if (!ch_dir) - return; dw_edma_debugfs_regs_ch(®s->type.unroll.ch[i].wr, ch_dir); @@ -237,8 +232,6 @@ static void dw_edma_debugfs_regs_rd(struct dentry *dir) char name[16]; regs_dir = debugfs_create_dir(READ_STR, dir); - if (!regs_dir) - return; nr_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(debugfs_regs); dw_edma_debugfs_create_x32(debugfs_regs, nr_entries, regs_dir); @@ -253,8 +246,6 @@ static void dw_edma_debugfs_regs_rd(struct dentry *dir) snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%s:%d", CHANNEL_STR, i); ch_dir = debugfs_create_dir(name, regs_dir); - if (!ch_dir) - return; dw_edma_debugfs_regs_ch(®s->type.unroll.ch[i].rd, ch_dir); @@ -273,8 +264,6 @@ static void dw_edma_debugfs_regs(void) int nr_entries; regs_dir = debugfs_create_dir(REGISTERS_STR, dw->debugfs); - if (!regs_dir) - return; nr_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(debugfs_regs); dw_edma_debugfs_create_x32(debugfs_regs, nr_entries, regs_dir); @@ -285,6 +274,9 @@ static void dw_edma_debugfs_regs(void) void dw_edma_v0_debugfs_on(struct dw_edma *_dw) { + if (!debugfs_initialized()) + return; + dw = _dw; if (!dw) return; @@ -294,8 +286,6 @@ void dw_edma_v0_debugfs_on(struct dw_edma *_dw) return; dw->debugfs = debugfs_create_dir(dw->name, NULL); - if (!dw->debugfs) - return; debugfs_create_u32("mf", 0444, dw->debugfs, &dw->chip->mf); debugfs_create_u16("wr_ch_cnt", 0444, dw->debugfs, &dw->wr_ch_cnt);