[v8,4/7] iommu/vt-d: Remove pasid_mutex

Commit Message

Jacob Pan June 2, 2023, 6:22 p.m. UTC

From: Lu Baolu <[e-mail]>

The pasid_mutex was used to protect the paths of set/remove_dev_pasid().
It's duplicate with iommu_sva_lock. Remove it to avoid duplicate code.

Reviewed-by: Jacob Pan <[e-mail]>
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <[e-mail]>
---
 drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c | 45 +++++----------------------------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)

Comments

Tian, Kevin June 14, 2023, 8:18 a.m. UTC | #1

> From: Jacob Pan <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Saturday, June 3, 2023 2:22 AM
> 
> From: Lu Baolu <[e-mail]>
> 
> The pasid_mutex was used to protect the paths of set/remove_dev_pasid().
> It's duplicate with iommu_sva_lock. Remove it to avoid duplicate code.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jacob Pan <[e-mail]>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <[e-mail]>

Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <[e-mail]>

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
index e95b339e9cdc..2a82864e9d57 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
@@ -259,8 +259,6 @@  static const struct mmu_notifier_ops intel_mmuops = {
 	.invalidate_range = intel_invalidate_range,
 };
 
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(pasid_mutex);
-
 static int pasid_to_svm_sdev(struct device *dev, unsigned int pasid,
 			     struct intel_svm **rsvm,
 			     struct intel_svm_dev **rsdev)
@@ -268,10 +266,6 @@  static int pasid_to_svm_sdev(struct device *dev, unsigned int pasid,
 	struct intel_svm_dev *sdev = NULL;
 	struct intel_svm *svm;
 
-	/* The caller should hold the pasid_mutex lock */
-	if (WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&pasid_mutex)))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	if (pasid == IOMMU_PASID_INVALID || pasid >= PASID_MAX)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
@@ -371,22 +365,19 @@  static int intel_svm_bind_mm(struct intel_iommu *iommu, struct device *dev,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-/* Caller must hold pasid_mutex */
-static int intel_svm_unbind_mm(struct device *dev, u32 pasid)
+void intel_svm_remove_dev_pasid(struct device *dev, u32 pasid)
 {
 	struct intel_svm_dev *sdev;
 	struct intel_iommu *iommu;
 	struct intel_svm *svm;
 	struct mm_struct *mm;
-	int ret = -EINVAL;
 
 	iommu = device_to_iommu(dev, NULL, NULL);
 	if (!iommu)
-		goto out;
+		return;
 
-	ret = pasid_to_svm_sdev(dev, pasid, &svm, &sdev);
-	if (ret)
-		goto out;
+	if (pasid_to_svm_sdev(dev, pasid, &svm, &sdev))
+		return;
 	mm = svm->mm;
 
 	if (sdev) {
@@ -418,8 +409,6 @@  static int intel_svm_unbind_mm(struct device *dev, u32 pasid)
 			kfree(svm);
 		}
 	}
-out:
-	return ret;
 }
 
 /* Page request queue descriptor */
@@ -520,19 +509,7 @@  static void intel_svm_drain_prq(struct device *dev, u32 pasid)
 		goto prq_retry;
 	}
 
-	/*
-	 * A work in IO page fault workqueue may try to lock pasid_mutex now.
-	 * Holding pasid_mutex while waiting in iopf_queue_flush_dev() for
-	 * all works in the workqueue to finish may cause deadlock.
-	 *
-	 * It's unnecessary to hold pasid_mutex in iopf_queue_flush_dev().
-	 * Unlock it to allow the works to be handled while waiting for
-	 * them to finish.
-	 */
-	lockdep_assert_held(&pasid_mutex);
-	mutex_unlock(&pasid_mutex);
 	iopf_queue_flush_dev(dev);
-	mutex_lock(&pasid_mutex);
 
 	/*
 	 * Perform steps described in VT-d spec CH7.10 to drain page
@@ -827,26 +804,14 @@  int intel_svm_page_response(struct device *dev,
 	return ret;
 }
 
-void intel_svm_remove_dev_pasid(struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid)
-{
-	mutex_lock(&pasid_mutex);
-	intel_svm_unbind_mm(dev, pasid);
-	mutex_unlock(&pasid_mutex);
-}
-
 static int intel_svm_set_dev_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
 				   struct device *dev, ioasid_t pasid)
 {
 	struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
 	struct intel_iommu *iommu = info->iommu;
 	struct mm_struct *mm = domain->mm;
-	int ret;
 
-	mutex_lock(&pasid_mutex);
-	ret = intel_svm_bind_mm(iommu, dev, mm);
-	mutex_unlock(&pasid_mutex);
-
-	return ret;
+	return intel_svm_bind_mm(iommu, dev, mm);
 }
 
 static void intel_svm_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)