From patchwork Tue Dec 5 10:50:08 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Li, Xin3" X-Patchwork-Id: 13480036 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="Z5Tq47ey" Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.12]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E43A1187; Tue, 5 Dec 2023 03:21:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1701775290; x=1733311290; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hPsnAnmRCEio5pl6T3lxKlJogXHr45sRU/QYYYLaUzw=; b=Z5Tq47eyrDr7px0HUR8QJ/kdeHe4FPlpSIQsmaYVWUagXRI0BdbByvIq oy+sQ45WJeh6vfSAWHGANk5CfpJ8Np7dOJatmUPfZd37ikfMg76YVjuLy qM+LNt8E6yDHk1C4Zc2pNCONnJphCt4m2wWrIHq2nKyiwgfCLxD+5IpkY 1tYkVhCSx0eOTJca0d4Add/RzTiV0lChojtB9K5/r4hD4ZS5K0BR1v7ID K/KvRl28/1fiDspkHf2TS30ck8tb1ge9+BNw5KGl+OJC55kmmqU7fUIQP Apj8NOHYo/3nTG9+tLRxAuF2Q3m7VAyEcTxB+xrULoGY5dKgQ2gDo3CVJ Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10914"; a="942530" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,252,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="942530" Received: from fmsmga006.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.20]) by orvoesa104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Dec 2023 03:21:23 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10914"; a="1018192965" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,252,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="1018192965" Received: from unknown (HELO fred..) ([172.25.112.68]) by fmsmga006.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Dec 2023 03:21:21 -0800 From: Xin Li To: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, luto@kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, seanjc@google.com, peterz@infradead.org, jgross@suse.com, ravi.v.shankar@intel.com, mhiramat@kernel.org, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, jiangshanlai@gmail.com, nik.borisov@suse.com, shan.kang@intel.com Subject: [PATCH v13 19/35] x86/fred: No ESPFIX needed when FRED is enabled Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 02:50:08 -0800 Message-ID: <20231205105030.8698-20-xin3.li@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20231205105030.8698-1-xin3.li@intel.com> References: <20231205105030.8698-1-xin3.li@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "H. Peter Anvin (Intel)" Because FRED always restores the full value of %rsp, ESPFIX is no longer needed when it's enabled. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin (Intel) Tested-by: Shan Kang Signed-off-by: Xin Li --- arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c index 16f9814c9be0..6726e0473d0b 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/espfix_64.c @@ -106,6 +106,10 @@ void __init init_espfix_bsp(void) pgd_t *pgd; p4d_t *p4d; + /* FRED systems always restore the full value of %rsp */ + if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_FRED)) + return; + /* Install the espfix pud into the kernel page directory */ pgd = &init_top_pgt[pgd_index(ESPFIX_BASE_ADDR)]; p4d = p4d_alloc(&init_mm, pgd, ESPFIX_BASE_ADDR); @@ -129,6 +133,10 @@ void init_espfix_ap(int cpu) void *stack_page; pteval_t ptemask; + /* FRED systems always restore the full value of %rsp */ + if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_FRED)) + return; + /* We only have to do this once... */ if (likely(per_cpu(espfix_stack, cpu))) return; /* Already initialized */