| Message ID | 20240709-imx95_edac-v1-1-3e9c146c1b01@nxp.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | EDAC: fsl-ddr, add imx9 support | expand |
On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 04:23:02PM -0400, Frank Li wrote: > Pass down fsl_mc_data in help function ddr_in32() and ddr_out32() to > prepare add iMX9 support. iMX9 have a little difference register layout. > > No functional change. > > Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com> > --- Ping? Frank > drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c b/drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c > index d148d262d0d4d..a7982370e2381 100644 > --- a/drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c > +++ b/drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c > @@ -35,13 +35,17 @@ static u32 orig_ddr_err_disable; > static u32 orig_ddr_err_sbe; > static bool little_endian; > > -static inline u32 ddr_in32(void __iomem *addr) > +static inline u32 ddr_in32(struct fsl_mc_pdata *pdata, unsigned int off) > { > + void __iomem *addr = pdata->mc_vbase + off; > + > return little_endian ? ioread32(addr) : ioread32be(addr); > } > > -static inline void ddr_out32(void __iomem *addr, u32 value) > +static inline void ddr_out32(struct fsl_mc_pdata *pdata, unsigned int off, u32 value) > { > + void __iomem *addr = pdata->mc_vbase + off; > + > if (little_endian) > iowrite32(value, addr); > else > @@ -60,7 +64,7 @@ static ssize_t fsl_mc_inject_data_hi_show(struct device *dev, > struct mem_ctl_info *mci = to_mci(dev); > struct fsl_mc_pdata *pdata = mci->pvt_info; > return sprintf(data, "0x%08x", > - ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_DATA_ERR_INJECT_HI)); > + ddr_in32(pdata, FSL_MC_DATA_ERR_INJECT_HI)); > } > > static ssize_t fsl_mc_inject_data_lo_show(struct device *dev, > @@ -70,7 +74,7 @@ static ssize_t fsl_mc_inject_data_lo_show(struct device *dev, > struct mem_ctl_info *mci = to_mci(dev); > struct fsl_mc_pdata *pdata = mci->pvt_info; > return sprintf(data, "0x%08x", > - ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_DATA_ERR_INJECT_LO)); > + ddr_in32(pdata, FSL_MC_DATA_ERR_INJECT_LO)); > } > > static ssize_t fsl_mc_inject_ctrl_show(struct device *dev, > @@ -80,7 +84,7 @@ static ssize_t fsl_mc_inject_ctrl_show(struct device *dev, > struct mem_ctl_info *mci = to_mci(dev); > struct fsl_mc_pdata *pdata = mci->pvt_info; > return sprintf(data, "0x%08x", > - ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_ECC_ERR_INJECT)); > + ddr_in32(pdata, FSL_MC_ECC_ERR_INJECT)); > } > > static ssize_t fsl_mc_inject_data_hi_store(struct device *dev, > @@ -97,7 +101,7 @@ static ssize_t fsl_mc_inject_data_hi_store(struct device *dev, > if (rc) > return rc; > > - ddr_out32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_DATA_ERR_INJECT_HI, val); > + ddr_out32(pdata, FSL_MC_DATA_ERR_INJECT_HI, val); > return count; > } > return 0; > @@ -117,7 +121,7 @@ static ssize_t fsl_mc_inject_data_lo_store(struct device *dev, > if (rc) > return rc; > > - ddr_out32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_DATA_ERR_INJECT_LO, val); > + ddr_out32(pdata, FSL_MC_DATA_ERR_INJECT_LO, val); > return count; > } > return 0; > @@ -137,7 +141,7 @@ static ssize_t fsl_mc_inject_ctrl_store(struct device *dev, > if (rc) > return rc; > > - ddr_out32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_ECC_ERR_INJECT, val); > + ddr_out32(pdata, FSL_MC_ECC_ERR_INJECT, val); > return count; > } > return 0; > @@ -286,7 +290,7 @@ static void fsl_mc_check(struct mem_ctl_info *mci) > int bad_data_bit; > int bad_ecc_bit; > > - err_detect = ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_ERR_DETECT); > + err_detect = ddr_in32(pdata, FSL_MC_ERR_DETECT); > if (!err_detect) > return; > > @@ -295,14 +299,14 @@ static void fsl_mc_check(struct mem_ctl_info *mci) > > /* no more processing if not ECC bit errors */ > if (!(err_detect & (DDR_EDE_SBE | DDR_EDE_MBE))) { > - ddr_out32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_ERR_DETECT, err_detect); > + ddr_out32(pdata, FSL_MC_ERR_DETECT, err_detect); > return; > } > > - syndrome = ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_CAPTURE_ECC); > + syndrome = ddr_in32(pdata, FSL_MC_CAPTURE_ECC); > > /* Mask off appropriate bits of syndrome based on bus width */ > - bus_width = (ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_DDR_SDRAM_CFG) & > + bus_width = (ddr_in32(pdata, FSL_MC_DDR_SDRAM_CFG) & > DSC_DBW_MASK) ? 32 : 64; > if (bus_width == 64) > syndrome &= 0xff; > @@ -310,8 +314,8 @@ static void fsl_mc_check(struct mem_ctl_info *mci) > syndrome &= 0xffff; > > err_addr = make64( > - ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_CAPTURE_EXT_ADDRESS), > - ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_CAPTURE_ADDRESS)); > + ddr_in32(pdata, FSL_MC_CAPTURE_EXT_ADDRESS), > + ddr_in32(pdata, FSL_MC_CAPTURE_ADDRESS)); > pfn = err_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT; > > for (row_index = 0; row_index < mci->nr_csrows; row_index++) { > @@ -320,8 +324,8 @@ static void fsl_mc_check(struct mem_ctl_info *mci) > break; > } > > - cap_high = ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_CAPTURE_DATA_HI); > - cap_low = ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_CAPTURE_DATA_LO); > + cap_high = ddr_in32(pdata, FSL_MC_CAPTURE_DATA_HI); > + cap_low = ddr_in32(pdata, FSL_MC_CAPTURE_DATA_LO); > > /* > * Analyze single-bit errors on 64-bit wide buses > @@ -367,7 +371,7 @@ static void fsl_mc_check(struct mem_ctl_info *mci) > row_index, 0, -1, > mci->ctl_name, ""); > > - ddr_out32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_ERR_DETECT, err_detect); > + ddr_out32(pdata, FSL_MC_ERR_DETECT, err_detect); > } > > static irqreturn_t fsl_mc_isr(int irq, void *dev_id) > @@ -376,7 +380,7 @@ static irqreturn_t fsl_mc_isr(int irq, void *dev_id) > struct fsl_mc_pdata *pdata = mci->pvt_info; > u32 err_detect; > > - err_detect = ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_ERR_DETECT); > + err_detect = ddr_in32(pdata, FSL_MC_ERR_DETECT); > if (!err_detect) > return IRQ_NONE; > > @@ -396,7 +400,7 @@ static void fsl_ddr_init_csrows(struct mem_ctl_info *mci) > u32 cs_bnds; > int index; > > - sdram_ctl = ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_DDR_SDRAM_CFG); > + sdram_ctl = ddr_in32(pdata, FSL_MC_DDR_SDRAM_CFG); > > sdtype = sdram_ctl & DSC_SDTYPE_MASK; > if (sdram_ctl & DSC_RD_EN) { > @@ -444,7 +448,7 @@ static void fsl_ddr_init_csrows(struct mem_ctl_info *mci) > csrow = mci->csrows[index]; > dimm = csrow->channels[0]->dimm; > > - cs_bnds = ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_CS_BNDS_0 + > + cs_bnds = ddr_in32(pdata, FSL_MC_CS_BNDS_0 + > (index * FSL_MC_CS_BNDS_OFS)); > > start = (cs_bnds & 0xffff0000) >> 16; > @@ -558,11 +562,11 @@ int fsl_mc_err_probe(struct platform_device *op) > fsl_ddr_init_csrows(mci); > > /* store the original error disable bits */ > - orig_ddr_err_disable = ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_ERR_DISABLE); > - ddr_out32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_ERR_DISABLE, 0); > + orig_ddr_err_disable = ddr_in32(pdata, FSL_MC_ERR_DISABLE); > + ddr_out32(pdata, FSL_MC_ERR_DISABLE, 0); > > /* clear all error bits */ > - ddr_out32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_ERR_DETECT, ~0); > + ddr_out32(pdata, FSL_MC_ERR_DETECT, ~0); > > res = edac_mc_add_mc_with_groups(mci, fsl_ddr_dev_groups); > if (res) { > @@ -571,15 +575,15 @@ int fsl_mc_err_probe(struct platform_device *op) > } > > if (edac_op_state == EDAC_OPSTATE_INT) { > - ddr_out32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_ERR_INT_EN, > + ddr_out32(pdata, FSL_MC_ERR_INT_EN, > DDR_EIE_MBEE | DDR_EIE_SBEE); > > /* store the original error management threshold */ > - orig_ddr_err_sbe = ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + > + orig_ddr_err_sbe = ddr_in32(pdata, > FSL_MC_ERR_SBE) & 0xff0000; > > /* set threshold to 1 error per interrupt */ > - ddr_out32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_ERR_SBE, 0x10000); > + ddr_out32(pdata, FSL_MC_ERR_SBE, 0x10000); > > /* register interrupts */ > pdata->irq = platform_get_irq(op, 0); > @@ -620,12 +624,12 @@ void fsl_mc_err_remove(struct platform_device *op) > edac_dbg(0, "\n"); > > if (edac_op_state == EDAC_OPSTATE_INT) { > - ddr_out32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_ERR_INT_EN, 0); > + ddr_out32(pdata, FSL_MC_ERR_INT_EN, 0); > } > > - ddr_out32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_ERR_DISABLE, > + ddr_out32(pdata, FSL_MC_ERR_DISABLE, > orig_ddr_err_disable); > - ddr_out32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_ERR_SBE, orig_ddr_err_sbe); > + ddr_out32(pdata, FSL_MC_ERR_SBE, orig_ddr_err_sbe); > > edac_mc_del_mc(&op->dev); > edac_mc_free(mci); > > -- > 2.34.1 >
On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 04:23:02PM -0400, Frank Li wrote: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] EDAC: fsl_ddr: Pass down fsl_mc_pdata in ddr_in32() and ddr_out32() The subject prefixes in the EDAC subsystem have the following format: "EDAC/driver: <Sentence starting with a capital letter" > Pass down fsl_mc_data in help function ddr_in32() and ddr_out32() to > prepare add iMX9 support. iMX9 have a little difference register layout. Since everyone is using AI nowadays, you could have it verify your commit messages. I did this: | ChatGPT, Please verify and correct the grammar in this english text: "Pass | down fsl_mc_data in help function ddr_in32() and ddr_out32() to prepare add | iMX9 support. iMX9 have a little difference register layout." It replied with: | "Pass down fsl_mc_data in the helper functions ddr_in32() and ddr_out32() to | prepare for adding iMX9 support. The iMX9 has a slightly different register | layout." | | Changes made: | 1. "help function" changed to "helper functions" for clarity. | | 2. "prepare add iMX9 support" changed to "prepare for adding iMX9 support" for | grammatical correctness. | | 3. "iMX9 have a little difference register layout" changed to "The iMX9 has | a slightly different register layout" for subject-verb agreement and | smoother phrasing. And this all looks good to me. With all the cringe we all get from AI, I think it is very useful for verifying commit messages. Do that for all your commit messages pls. Thx. > Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com> > --- > drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) How did you test these patches of yours? They don't even build! drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c: In function 'fsl_mc_err_probe': drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c:538:21: error: too few arguments to function 'ddr_in32' 538 | sdram_ctl = ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_DDR_SDRAM_CFG); | ^~~~~~~~ drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c:38:19: note: declared here 38 | static inline u32 ddr_in32(struct fsl_mc_pdata *pdata, unsigned int off) | ^~~~~~~~ make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:229: drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.o] Error 1 make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:478: drivers/edac] Error 2 make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:478: drivers] Error 2 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... make[1]: *** [/mnt/kernel/kernel/2nd/linux/Makefile:1936: .] Error 2 make: *** [Makefile:224: __sub-make] Error 2 Before you submit next time, build-test *every* *single* patch of yours and test the driver with all of them. This should not ever happen in submission. Stopping review here.
On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 05:33:20PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Jul 09, 2024 at 04:23:02PM -0400, Frank Li wrote: > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] EDAC: fsl_ddr: Pass down fsl_mc_pdata in ddr_in32() and ddr_out32() > > The subject prefixes in the EDAC subsystem have the following format: > > "EDAC/driver: <Sentence starting with a capital letter" > > > Pass down fsl_mc_data in help function ddr_in32() and ddr_out32() to > > prepare add iMX9 support. iMX9 have a little difference register layout. > > Since everyone is using AI nowadays, you could have it verify your commit > messages. I did this: > > | ChatGPT, Please verify and correct the grammar in this english text: "Pass > | down fsl_mc_data in help function ddr_in32() and ddr_out32() to prepare add > | iMX9 support. iMX9 have a little difference register layout." > > It replied with: > > | "Pass down fsl_mc_data in the helper functions ddr_in32() and ddr_out32() to > | prepare for adding iMX9 support. The iMX9 has a slightly different register > | layout." > | > | Changes made: > | 1. "help function" changed to "helper functions" for clarity. > | > | 2. "prepare add iMX9 support" changed to "prepare for adding iMX9 support" for > | grammatical correctness. > | > | 3. "iMX9 have a little difference register layout" changed to "The iMX9 has > | a slightly different register layout" for subject-verb agreement and > | smoother phrasing. > > And this all looks good to me. > > With all the cringe we all get from AI, I think it is very useful for > verifying commit messages. > > Do that for all your commit messages pls. > > Thx. > > > Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com> > > --- > > drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- > > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) > > How did you test these patches of yours? > > They don't even build! > > drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c: In function 'fsl_mc_err_probe': > drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c:538:21: error: too few arguments to function 'ddr_in32' > 538 | sdram_ctl = ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_DDR_SDRAM_CFG); > | ^~~~~~~~ > drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c:38:19: note: declared here > 38 | static inline u32 ddr_in32(struct fsl_mc_pdata *pdata, unsigned int off) > | ^~~~~~~~ > make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:229: drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.o] Error 1 > make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:478: drivers/edac] Error 2 > make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > make[2]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:478: drivers] Error 2 > make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > make[1]: *** [/mnt/kernel/kernel/2nd/linux/Makefile:1936: .] Error 2 > make: *** [Makefile:224: __sub-make] Error 2 > > Before you submit next time, build-test *every* *single* patch of yours and > test the driver with all of them. > > This should not ever happen in submission. Really sorry about this. I need debug why my check script have not found this problem. Frank > > Stopping review here. > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
diff --git a/drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c b/drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c index d148d262d0d4d..a7982370e2381 100644 --- a/drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c +++ b/drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c @@ -35,13 +35,17 @@ static u32 orig_ddr_err_disable; static u32 orig_ddr_err_sbe; static bool little_endian; -static inline u32 ddr_in32(void __iomem *addr) +static inline u32 ddr_in32(struct fsl_mc_pdata *pdata, unsigned int off) { + void __iomem *addr = pdata->mc_vbase + off; + return little_endian ? ioread32(addr) : ioread32be(addr); } -static inline void ddr_out32(void __iomem *addr, u32 value) +static inline void ddr_out32(struct fsl_mc_pdata *pdata, unsigned int off, u32 value) { + void __iomem *addr = pdata->mc_vbase + off; + if (little_endian) iowrite32(value, addr); else @@ -60,7 +64,7 @@ static ssize_t fsl_mc_inject_data_hi_show(struct device *dev, struct mem_ctl_info *mci = to_mci(dev); struct fsl_mc_pdata *pdata = mci->pvt_info; return sprintf(data, "0x%08x", - ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_DATA_ERR_INJECT_HI)); + ddr_in32(pdata, FSL_MC_DATA_ERR_INJECT_HI)); } static ssize_t fsl_mc_inject_data_lo_show(struct device *dev, @@ -70,7 +74,7 @@ static ssize_t fsl_mc_inject_data_lo_show(struct device *dev, struct mem_ctl_info *mci = to_mci(dev); struct fsl_mc_pdata *pdata = mci->pvt_info; return sprintf(data, "0x%08x", - ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_DATA_ERR_INJECT_LO)); + ddr_in32(pdata, FSL_MC_DATA_ERR_INJECT_LO)); } static ssize_t fsl_mc_inject_ctrl_show(struct device *dev, @@ -80,7 +84,7 @@ static ssize_t fsl_mc_inject_ctrl_show(struct device *dev, struct mem_ctl_info *mci = to_mci(dev); struct fsl_mc_pdata *pdata = mci->pvt_info; return sprintf(data, "0x%08x", - ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_ECC_ERR_INJECT)); + ddr_in32(pdata, FSL_MC_ECC_ERR_INJECT)); } static ssize_t fsl_mc_inject_data_hi_store(struct device *dev, @@ -97,7 +101,7 @@ static ssize_t fsl_mc_inject_data_hi_store(struct device *dev, if (rc) return rc; - ddr_out32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_DATA_ERR_INJECT_HI, val); + ddr_out32(pdata, FSL_MC_DATA_ERR_INJECT_HI, val); return count; } return 0; @@ -117,7 +121,7 @@ static ssize_t fsl_mc_inject_data_lo_store(struct device *dev, if (rc) return rc; - ddr_out32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_DATA_ERR_INJECT_LO, val); + ddr_out32(pdata, FSL_MC_DATA_ERR_INJECT_LO, val); return count; } return 0; @@ -137,7 +141,7 @@ static ssize_t fsl_mc_inject_ctrl_store(struct device *dev, if (rc) return rc; - ddr_out32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_ECC_ERR_INJECT, val); + ddr_out32(pdata, FSL_MC_ECC_ERR_INJECT, val); return count; } return 0; @@ -286,7 +290,7 @@ static void fsl_mc_check(struct mem_ctl_info *mci) int bad_data_bit; int bad_ecc_bit; - err_detect = ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_ERR_DETECT); + err_detect = ddr_in32(pdata, FSL_MC_ERR_DETECT); if (!err_detect) return; @@ -295,14 +299,14 @@ static void fsl_mc_check(struct mem_ctl_info *mci) /* no more processing if not ECC bit errors */ if (!(err_detect & (DDR_EDE_SBE | DDR_EDE_MBE))) { - ddr_out32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_ERR_DETECT, err_detect); + ddr_out32(pdata, FSL_MC_ERR_DETECT, err_detect); return; } - syndrome = ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_CAPTURE_ECC); + syndrome = ddr_in32(pdata, FSL_MC_CAPTURE_ECC); /* Mask off appropriate bits of syndrome based on bus width */ - bus_width = (ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_DDR_SDRAM_CFG) & + bus_width = (ddr_in32(pdata, FSL_MC_DDR_SDRAM_CFG) & DSC_DBW_MASK) ? 32 : 64; if (bus_width == 64) syndrome &= 0xff; @@ -310,8 +314,8 @@ static void fsl_mc_check(struct mem_ctl_info *mci) syndrome &= 0xffff; err_addr = make64( - ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_CAPTURE_EXT_ADDRESS), - ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_CAPTURE_ADDRESS)); + ddr_in32(pdata, FSL_MC_CAPTURE_EXT_ADDRESS), + ddr_in32(pdata, FSL_MC_CAPTURE_ADDRESS)); pfn = err_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT; for (row_index = 0; row_index < mci->nr_csrows; row_index++) { @@ -320,8 +324,8 @@ static void fsl_mc_check(struct mem_ctl_info *mci) break; } - cap_high = ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_CAPTURE_DATA_HI); - cap_low = ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_CAPTURE_DATA_LO); + cap_high = ddr_in32(pdata, FSL_MC_CAPTURE_DATA_HI); + cap_low = ddr_in32(pdata, FSL_MC_CAPTURE_DATA_LO); /* * Analyze single-bit errors on 64-bit wide buses @@ -367,7 +371,7 @@ static void fsl_mc_check(struct mem_ctl_info *mci) row_index, 0, -1, mci->ctl_name, ""); - ddr_out32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_ERR_DETECT, err_detect); + ddr_out32(pdata, FSL_MC_ERR_DETECT, err_detect); } static irqreturn_t fsl_mc_isr(int irq, void *dev_id) @@ -376,7 +380,7 @@ static irqreturn_t fsl_mc_isr(int irq, void *dev_id) struct fsl_mc_pdata *pdata = mci->pvt_info; u32 err_detect; - err_detect = ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_ERR_DETECT); + err_detect = ddr_in32(pdata, FSL_MC_ERR_DETECT); if (!err_detect) return IRQ_NONE; @@ -396,7 +400,7 @@ static void fsl_ddr_init_csrows(struct mem_ctl_info *mci) u32 cs_bnds; int index; - sdram_ctl = ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_DDR_SDRAM_CFG); + sdram_ctl = ddr_in32(pdata, FSL_MC_DDR_SDRAM_CFG); sdtype = sdram_ctl & DSC_SDTYPE_MASK; if (sdram_ctl & DSC_RD_EN) { @@ -444,7 +448,7 @@ static void fsl_ddr_init_csrows(struct mem_ctl_info *mci) csrow = mci->csrows[index]; dimm = csrow->channels[0]->dimm; - cs_bnds = ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_CS_BNDS_0 + + cs_bnds = ddr_in32(pdata, FSL_MC_CS_BNDS_0 + (index * FSL_MC_CS_BNDS_OFS)); start = (cs_bnds & 0xffff0000) >> 16; @@ -558,11 +562,11 @@ int fsl_mc_err_probe(struct platform_device *op) fsl_ddr_init_csrows(mci); /* store the original error disable bits */ - orig_ddr_err_disable = ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_ERR_DISABLE); - ddr_out32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_ERR_DISABLE, 0); + orig_ddr_err_disable = ddr_in32(pdata, FSL_MC_ERR_DISABLE); + ddr_out32(pdata, FSL_MC_ERR_DISABLE, 0); /* clear all error bits */ - ddr_out32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_ERR_DETECT, ~0); + ddr_out32(pdata, FSL_MC_ERR_DETECT, ~0); res = edac_mc_add_mc_with_groups(mci, fsl_ddr_dev_groups); if (res) { @@ -571,15 +575,15 @@ int fsl_mc_err_probe(struct platform_device *op) } if (edac_op_state == EDAC_OPSTATE_INT) { - ddr_out32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_ERR_INT_EN, + ddr_out32(pdata, FSL_MC_ERR_INT_EN, DDR_EIE_MBEE | DDR_EIE_SBEE); /* store the original error management threshold */ - orig_ddr_err_sbe = ddr_in32(pdata->mc_vbase + + orig_ddr_err_sbe = ddr_in32(pdata, FSL_MC_ERR_SBE) & 0xff0000; /* set threshold to 1 error per interrupt */ - ddr_out32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_ERR_SBE, 0x10000); + ddr_out32(pdata, FSL_MC_ERR_SBE, 0x10000); /* register interrupts */ pdata->irq = platform_get_irq(op, 0); @@ -620,12 +624,12 @@ void fsl_mc_err_remove(struct platform_device *op) edac_dbg(0, "\n"); if (edac_op_state == EDAC_OPSTATE_INT) { - ddr_out32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_ERR_INT_EN, 0); + ddr_out32(pdata, FSL_MC_ERR_INT_EN, 0); } - ddr_out32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_ERR_DISABLE, + ddr_out32(pdata, FSL_MC_ERR_DISABLE, orig_ddr_err_disable); - ddr_out32(pdata->mc_vbase + FSL_MC_ERR_SBE, orig_ddr_err_sbe); + ddr_out32(pdata, FSL_MC_ERR_SBE, orig_ddr_err_sbe); edac_mc_del_mc(&op->dev); edac_mc_free(mci);
Pass down fsl_mc_data in help function ddr_in32() and ddr_out32() to prepare add iMX9 support. iMX9 have a little difference register layout. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com> --- drivers/edac/fsl_ddr_edac.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)