Message ID | 20211103122809.1040754-1-javierm@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Cleanups for the nomodeset kernel command line parameter logic | expand |
Hi Am 03.11.21 um 13:28 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas: > [ resend with all relevant people as Cc now, sorry to others for the spam ] > > There is a lot of historical baggage on this parameter. It's defined in > the vgacon driver as a "nomodeset" parameter, but it's handler function is > called text_mode() that sets a variable named vgacon_text_mode_force whose > value is queried with a function named vgacon_text_force(). > > All this implies that it's about forcing text mode for VGA, yet it is not > used in neither vgacon nor other console driver. The only users for these > are DRM drivers, that check for the vgacon_text_force() return value to > determine whether the driver could be loaded or not. > > That makes it quite confusing to read the code, because the variables and > function names don't reflect what they actually do and also are not in the > same subsystem as the drivers that make use of them. > > This patch-set attempts to cleanup the code by moving the nomodseset param > to the DRM subsystem and do some renaming to make their intention clearer. > > There is also another aspect that could be improved, and is the fact that > drivers are checking for the nomodeset being set as an indication if have > to be loaded. > > But there may be other reasons why this could be the case, so it is better > to encapsulate the logic in a separate function to make clear what's about. > > Patch #1 is just a trivial fix for a comment that isn't referring to the > correct kernel parameter. > > Patch #2 moves the nomodeset logic to the DRM subsystem. > > Patch #3 renames the vgacon_text_force() function and accompaning logic as > drm_modeset_disabled(), which is what this function is really about. > > Patch #4 adds a drm_drv_enabled() function that could be used by drivers > to check if could be enabled. > > Patch #5 uses the drm_drv_enabled() function to check this instead of just > checking if nomodeset has been set. > > > Javier Martinez Canillas (5): > drm/i915: Fix comment about modeset parameters > drm: Move nomodeset kernel parameter handler to the DRM subsystem > drm: Rename vgacon_text_force() function to drm_modeset_disabled() > drm: Add a drm_drv_enabled() helper function > drm: Use drm_drv_enabled() instead of drm_modeset_disabled() There's too much churn here IMHO. Please merge patches 2+3 and 4+5. And I'd put patch (4+5) first, so you have the drivers out of the way. After that patch (2+3) should only modify drm_drv_enabled(). Best regards Thomas > > drivers/gpu/drm/Makefile | 2 ++ > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c | 5 ++--- > drivers/gpu/drm/ast/ast_drv.c | 3 +-- > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_nomodeset.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_module.c | 10 +++++----- > drivers/gpu/drm/mgag200/mgag200_drv.c | 3 +-- > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c | 3 +-- > drivers/gpu/drm/qxl/qxl_drv.c | 3 +-- > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_drv.c | 3 +-- > drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/bochs.c | 3 +-- > drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/cirrus.c | 3 +-- > drivers/gpu/drm/vboxvideo/vbox_drv.c | 5 +---- > drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_drv.c | 3 +-- > drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c | 3 +-- > drivers/video/console/vgacon.c | 21 -------------------- > include/drm/drm_drv.h | 1 + > include/drm/drm_mode_config.h | 6 ++++++ > include/linux/console.h | 6 ------ > 19 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_nomodeset.c >
Hello Thomas, On 11/3/21 14:01, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: [snip] >> >> >> Javier Martinez Canillas (5): >> drm/i915: Fix comment about modeset parameters >> drm: Move nomodeset kernel parameter handler to the DRM subsystem >> drm: Rename vgacon_text_force() function to drm_modeset_disabled() >> drm: Add a drm_drv_enabled() helper function >> drm: Use drm_drv_enabled() instead of drm_modeset_disabled() > > There's too much churn here IMHO. Please merge patches 2+3 and 4+5. And > I'd put patch (4+5) first, so you have the drivers out of the way. After > that patch (2+3) should only modify drm_drv_enabled(). > Sure, I'm happy with less patches. Thanks for your feedback. > Best regards > Thomas > Best regards,