diff mbox

[11/23] ARM: dts: omap5-uevm.dts: add tca6424a

Message ID 1398334639-14172-12-git-send-email-tomi.valkeinen@ti.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Tomi Valkeinen April 24, 2014, 10:17 a.m. UTC
omap5-uevm has a tca6424a I/O expander. Add it to the .dts file.

Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

Comments

Sergei Shtylyov April 24, 2014, 1:49 p.m. UTC | #1
Hello.

On 24-04-2014 14:17, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:

> omap5-uevm has a tca6424a I/O expander. Add it to the .dts file.

> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts | 7 +++++++
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts
> index 3b99ec25b748..9e7581eaeb23 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts
> @@ -434,6 +434,13 @@
>   	pinctrl-0 = <&i2c5_pins>;
>
>   	clock-frequency = <400000>;
> +
> +	tca6424a: tca6424a@22 {

    The ePAPR standard [1] says: "The name of a node should be somewhat generic,
reflecting the function of the device and not its precise programming model.
If appropriate, the name should be one of the following choices:
[...]
    - gpio;"

> +		compatible = "ti,tca6424";
> +		reg = <0x22>;
> +		gpio-controller;
> +		#gpio-cells = <2>;
> +	};
>   };

[1] http://www.power.org/resources/downloads/Power_ePAPR_APPROVED_v1.0.pdf

WBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Tomi Valkeinen April 24, 2014, 2:33 p.m. UTC | #2
On 24/04/14 16:49, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On 24-04-2014 14:17, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> 
>> omap5-uevm has a tca6424a I/O expander. Add it to the .dts file.
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
>> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts | 7 +++++++
>>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts
>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts
>> index 3b99ec25b748..9e7581eaeb23 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts
>> @@ -434,6 +434,13 @@
>>       pinctrl-0 = <&i2c5_pins>;
>>
>>       clock-frequency = <400000>;
>> +
>> +    tca6424a: tca6424a@22 {
> 
>    The ePAPR standard [1] says: "The name of a node should be somewhat
> generic,
> reflecting the function of the device and not its precise programming
> model.
> If appropriate, the name should be one of the following choices:
> [...]
>    - gpio;"

Right. I wonder what the name should be... "gpio" is out, as the name
should be more specific. We already have gpio1-8, which are the gpio
banks from the SoC. It could be 'gpio9', but that makes it sound it's
just one more SoC gpio bank. 'gpio-expander1'?

 Tomi
Sergei Shtylyov April 24, 2014, 4:53 p.m. UTC | #3
Hello.

On 04/24/2014 06:33 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:

>>> omap5-uevm has a tca6424a I/O expander. Add it to the .dts file.

>>> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
>>> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
>>> ---
>>>    arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts | 7 +++++++
>>>    1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts
>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts
>>> index 3b99ec25b748..9e7581eaeb23 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts
>>> @@ -434,6 +434,13 @@
>>>        pinctrl-0 = <&i2c5_pins>;
>>>
>>>        clock-frequency = <400000>;
>>> +
>>> +    tca6424a: tca6424a@22 {

>>     The ePAPR standard [1] says: "The name of a node should be somewhat
>> generic,
>> reflecting the function of the device and not its precise programming
>> model.
>> If appropriate, the name should be one of the following choices:
>> [...]
>>     - gpio;"

> Right. I wonder what the name should be... "gpio" is out, as the name
> should be more specific.

    No, it's not out. The name should be "gpio@22", I think it would be unique.

> We already have gpio1-8, which are the gpio
> banks from the SoC.

    I don't understand why you are indexing the names while you probably have 
the address part after @ that makes them unique already.

>   Tomi

WBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Tomi Valkeinen April 25, 2014, 2:20 p.m. UTC | #4
On 24/04/14 19:53, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:

>> Right. I wonder what the name should be... "gpio" is out, as the name
>> should be more specific.
> 
>    No, it's not out. The name should be "gpio@22", I think it would be
> unique.
> 
>> We already have gpio1-8, which are the gpio
>> banks from the SoC.
> 
>    I don't understand why you are indexing the names while you probably
> have the address part after @ that makes them unique already.

Ah sorry for the confusion, I misunderstood. I was talking about the
label, not the name, of the node.

So the labels for the gpio banks are 'gpio2' etc. The names are
'gpio@123456' etc. And yes, here the name should be 'gpio@22' as you said.

I didn't see any rules about the labels in the ePARP doc, so I guess
'tca6424a' would be a valid one. Maybe not a good one, though,
especially if there are multiple tca6424a chips on the board (I need to
check).

 Tomi
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts
index 3b99ec25b748..9e7581eaeb23 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap5-uevm.dts
@@ -434,6 +434,13 @@ 
 	pinctrl-0 = <&i2c5_pins>;
 
 	clock-frequency = <400000>;
+
+	tca6424a: tca6424a@22 {
+		compatible = "ti,tca6424";
+		reg = <0x22>;
+		gpio-controller;
+		#gpio-cells = <2>;
+	};
 };
 
 &mcbsp3 {