Message ID | 20140516093123.GA17245@devel.8.8.4.4 (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 16/05/14 12:31, Daeseok Youn wrote: > It doesn't need to check "err" for printing info. > And also use pr_info instead of printk. > > Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@gmail.com> > --- > V2: removes unneeded lines for sending a patch > > drivers/video/fbdev/i810/i810_main.c | 7 +++---- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/i810/i810_main.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/i810/i810_main.c > index bb674e4..15cb397 100644 > --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/i810/i810_main.c > +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/i810/i810_main.c > @@ -1910,13 +1910,12 @@ static void i810fb_find_init_mode(struct fb_info *info) > > for (i = 0; i < par->ddc_num + 1; i++) { > err = i810_probe_i2c_connector(info, &par->edid, i); > - if (!err) > + if (!err) { > + pr_info("i810fb_init_pci: DDC probe successful\n"); > break; > + } > } > > - if (!err) > - printk("i810fb_init_pci: DDC probe successful\n"); > - > fb_edid_to_monspecs(par->edid, specs); > > if (specs->modedb == NULL) > I don't know... I think I personally like more the original version. In fact, the whole print looks quite useless to me, or at least it should be a debug print. Tomi
Hi, 2014-08-26 19:34 GMT+09:00 Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>: > On 16/05/14 12:31, Daeseok Youn wrote: >> It doesn't need to check "err" for printing info. >> And also use pr_info instead of printk. >> >> Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@gmail.com> >> --- >> V2: removes unneeded lines for sending a patch >> >> drivers/video/fbdev/i810/i810_main.c | 7 +++---- >> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/i810/i810_main.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/i810/i810_main.c >> index bb674e4..15cb397 100644 >> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/i810/i810_main.c >> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/i810/i810_main.c >> @@ -1910,13 +1910,12 @@ static void i810fb_find_init_mode(struct fb_info *info) >> >> for (i = 0; i < par->ddc_num + 1; i++) { >> err = i810_probe_i2c_connector(info, &par->edid, i); >> - if (!err) >> + if (!err) { >> + pr_info("i810fb_init_pci: DDC probe successful\n"); >> break; >> + } >> } >> >> - if (!err) >> - printk("i810fb_init_pci: DDC probe successful\n"); >> - >> fb_edid_to_monspecs(par->edid, specs); >> >> if (specs->modedb == NULL) >> > > I don't know... I think I personally like more the original version. In > fact, the whole print looks quite useless to me, or at least it should > be a debug print. Yes. this patch doesn't need. Thanks for review. regards, Daeseok Youn. > > Tomi > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fbdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/i810/i810_main.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/i810/i810_main.c index bb674e4..15cb397 100644 --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/i810/i810_main.c +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/i810/i810_main.c @@ -1910,13 +1910,12 @@ static void i810fb_find_init_mode(struct fb_info *info) for (i = 0; i < par->ddc_num + 1; i++) { err = i810_probe_i2c_connector(info, &par->edid, i); - if (!err) + if (!err) { + pr_info("i810fb_init_pci: DDC probe successful\n"); break; + } } - if (!err) - printk("i810fb_init_pci: DDC probe successful\n"); - fb_edid_to_monspecs(par->edid, specs); if (specs->modedb == NULL)
It doesn't need to check "err" for printing info. And also use pr_info instead of printk. Signed-off-by: Daeseok Youn <daeseok.youn@gmail.com> --- V2: removes unneeded lines for sending a patch drivers/video/fbdev/i810/i810_main.c | 7 +++---- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)