Message ID | 20200417113312.24340-3-tomi.valkeinen@ti.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/5] backlight: led_bl: fix cosmetic issues | expand |
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 02:33:10PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > led_bl does not lock 'led_access' when calling led_sysfs_disable and > led_sysfs_enable, causing the below WARN. Add the locking. > > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 223 at drivers/leds/led-core.c:353 led_sysfs_disable+0x4c/0x5c > > Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> I did wonder if it might be better to provide self-locking API from the LED sub-sys but it looks like elsewhere led_sysfs_disable() is frequently paired with led_trigger_set() (and both under the same lock)... Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/video/backlight/led_bl.c | 10 ++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/led_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/led_bl.c > index c46ecdfe8b0a..63693c4f0883 100644 > --- a/drivers/video/backlight/led_bl.c > +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/led_bl.c > @@ -216,8 +216,11 @@ static int led_bl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > return PTR_ERR(priv->bl_dev); > } > > - for (i = 0; i < priv->nb_leds; i++) > + for (i = 0; i < priv->nb_leds; i++) { > + mutex_lock(&priv->leds[i]->led_access); > led_sysfs_disable(priv->leds[i]); > + mutex_unlock(&priv->leds[i]->led_access); > + } > > backlight_update_status(priv->bl_dev); > > @@ -233,8 +236,11 @@ static int led_bl_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > backlight_device_unregister(bl); > > led_bl_power_off(priv); > - for (i = 0; i < priv->nb_leds; i++) > + for (i = 0; i < priv->nb_leds; i++) { > + mutex_lock(&priv->leds[i]->led_access); > led_sysfs_enable(priv->leds[i]); > + mutex_unlock(&priv->leds[i]->led_access); > + } > > return 0; > } > -- > Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. > Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki >
diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/led_bl.c b/drivers/video/backlight/led_bl.c index c46ecdfe8b0a..63693c4f0883 100644 --- a/drivers/video/backlight/led_bl.c +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/led_bl.c @@ -216,8 +216,11 @@ static int led_bl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return PTR_ERR(priv->bl_dev); } - for (i = 0; i < priv->nb_leds; i++) + for (i = 0; i < priv->nb_leds; i++) { + mutex_lock(&priv->leds[i]->led_access); led_sysfs_disable(priv->leds[i]); + mutex_unlock(&priv->leds[i]->led_access); + } backlight_update_status(priv->bl_dev); @@ -233,8 +236,11 @@ static int led_bl_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) backlight_device_unregister(bl); led_bl_power_off(priv); - for (i = 0; i < priv->nb_leds; i++) + for (i = 0; i < priv->nb_leds; i++) { + mutex_lock(&priv->leds[i]->led_access); led_sysfs_enable(priv->leds[i]); + mutex_unlock(&priv->leds[i]->led_access); + } return 0; }
led_bl does not lock 'led_access' when calling led_sysfs_disable and led_sysfs_enable, causing the below WARN. Add the locking. WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 223 at drivers/leds/led-core.c:353 led_sysfs_disable+0x4c/0x5c Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> --- drivers/video/backlight/led_bl.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)