@@ -218,23 +218,10 @@ static dma_addr_t crypt_phys;
static int support_aes = 1;
-static void dev_release(struct device *dev)
-{
- return;
-}
-
#define DRIVER_NAME "ixp4xx_crypto"
-static struct platform_device pseudo_dev = {
- .name = DRIVER_NAME,
- .id = 0,
- .num_resources = 0,
- .dev = {
- .coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
- .release = dev_release,
- }
-};
-static struct device *dev = &pseudo_dev.dev;
+static struct platform_device *pdev;
+static struct device *dev;
static inline dma_addr_t crypt_virt2phys(struct crypt_ctl *virt)
{
@@ -1418,20 +1405,30 @@ static struct ixp_alg ixp4xx_algos[] = {
} };
#define IXP_POSTFIX "-ixp4xx"
+
+static const struct platform_device_info ixp_dev_info __initdata = {
+ .name = DRIVER_NAME,
+ .id = 0,
+ .dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
+};
+
static int __init ixp_module_init(void)
{
int num = ARRAY_SIZE(ixp4xx_algos);
- int i,err ;
+ int i, err ;
- if (platform_device_register(&pseudo_dev))
- return -ENODEV;
+ pdev = platform_device_register_full(&ixp_dev_info);
+ if (IS_ERR(pdev))
+ return PTR_ERR(pdev);
+
+ dev = &pdev->dev;
spin_lock_init(&desc_lock);
spin_lock_init(&emerg_lock);
err = init_ixp_crypto();
if (err) {
- platform_device_unregister(&pseudo_dev);
+ platform_device_unregister(pdev);
return err;
}
for (i=0; i< num; i++) {
@@ -1496,7 +1493,7 @@ static void __exit ixp_module_exit(void)
crypto_unregister_alg(&ixp4xx_algos[i].crypto);
}
release_ixp_crypto();
- platform_device_unregister(&pseudo_dev);
+ platform_device_unregister(pdev);
}
module_init(ixp_module_init);
Don't statically allocate struct device's in modules, and shut the warning up with an empty release() function. There's a reason that warning is there and that's not for people to hide in this way. It's there to persuade people to use the correct APIs to allocate platform devices. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> --- drivers/crypto/ixp4xx_crypto.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)