mbox series

[00/16] Remove usage of the deprecated "pci-dma-compat.h" API

Message ID cover.1641500561.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series Remove usage of the deprecated "pci-dma-compat.h" API | expand

Message

Christophe JAILLET Jan. 6, 2022, 9:45 p.m. UTC
This serie axes all the remaining usages of the deprecated "pci-dma-compat.h"
API.

All these patches have already been posted.

They have been generated with a coccinelle script.
The tricky parts are patches that use dma_alloc_coherent() because the correct
GFP flag has to be used in place of the previous embedded GFP_ATOMIC.

Patches 1-3 are already Reviewed. References to the corresponding mail is
given below the ---

Patch 1-2,4-10 are just generated from the coccinelle script. Only too long
lines have been hand modified. dma_alloc_coherent() modification are NOT part
of these patches.

Patch 3 also includes some 'dma_set_mask_and_coherent()' instead of
'pci_set_dma_mask()/pci_set_consistent_dma_mask()'.
I've left this additional modification because it was reviewed with it.

Patch 10-15 are the tricky parts. Explanation of which GFP flag is the right one
is given in each patch. It has been divided in several patches to ease review.

Patch 15 is the only one I'm slighly unsure with. The old code was using a
GFP_USER flag in the function. I'm not familiar with it.
I *guess*  that GFP_KERNEL is fine, but maybe it should also be GFP_USER or left
as GFP_ATOMIC so that nothing is changed.

Patch 16 is the last step that remove "pci-dma-compat.h" and its only usage.


All patches, exept 1-2,6 that are architecture specific, have been compile tested.


After all that, a few rst files, 1 or 2 strings in error messages and some
error branching labels should still need some attention. 
This is some minor issues.


Only the cover letter is sent to every one. Each patch is sent to the
corresponding maintainer(s) + Andrew Morton, Christoph Hellwig and Arnd Bergmann.


Best regards.


Christophe JAILLET (16):
  alpha: Remove usage of the deprecated "pci-dma-compat.h" API
  floppy: Remove usage of the deprecated "pci-dma-compat.h" API
  fpga: dfl: pci: Remove usage of the deprecated "pci-dma-compat.h" API
  media: Remove usage of the deprecated "pci-dma-compat.h" API
  agp/intel: Remove usage of the deprecated "pci-dma-compat.h" API
  sparc: Remove usage of the deprecated "pci-dma-compat.h" API
  dmaengine: pch_dma: Remove usage of the deprecated "pci-dma-compat.h"
    API
  rapidio/tsi721: Remove usage of the deprecated "pci-dma-compat.h" API
  media: v4l2-pci-skeleton: Remove usage of the deprecated
    "pci-dma-compat.h" API
  scsi: message: fusion: Remove usage of the deprecated
    "pci-dma-compat.h" API
  scsi: mptbase: Use dma_alloc_coherent() in 'mpt_alloc_fw_memory()'
  scsi: mptbase: Use dma_alloc_coherent()
  scsi: mptsas: Use dma_alloc_coherent() in
    mptsas_exp_repmanufacture_info()
  scsi: mptsas: Use dma_alloc_coherent()
  scsi: mptctl: Use dma_alloc_coherent()
  PCI: Remove usage of the deprecated "pci-dma-compat.h" API

 arch/alpha/include/asm/floppy.h     |   7 +-
 arch/alpha/kernel/pci_iommu.c       |  12 +--
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/floppy.h   |   8 +-
 arch/sparc/kernel/ioport.c          |   2 +-
 drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c        |  26 ++---
 drivers/dma/pch_dma.c               |   2 +-
 drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c              |  14 +--
 drivers/media/pci/cx18/cx18-queue.h |   6 +-
 drivers/media/pci/ivtv/ivtv-queue.h |  25 +++--
 drivers/media/pci/ivtv/ivtv-udma.h  |   8 +-
 drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c    | 149 ++++++++++++++++------------
 drivers/message/fusion/mptctl.c     |  82 +++++++++------
 drivers/message/fusion/mptlan.c     |  90 +++++++++--------
 drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c     |  94 +++++++++---------
 drivers/rapidio/devices/tsi721.c    |   8 +-
 include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h      | 129 ------------------------
 include/linux/pci.h                 |   3 -
 samples/v4l/v4l2-pci-skeleton.c     |   2 +-
 18 files changed, 289 insertions(+), 378 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h

Comments

Martin K. Petersen Jan. 10, 2022, 3:35 p.m. UTC | #1
Christophe,

> This serie axes all the remaining usages of the deprecated
> "pci-dma-compat.h" API.

Applied patches 10-15 to 5.17/scsi-staging, thanks!
Martin K. Petersen Jan. 19, 2022, 4:06 a.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, 6 Jan 2022 22:45:13 +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:

> This serie axes all the remaining usages of the deprecated "pci-dma-compat.h"
> API.
> 
> All these patches have already been posted.
> 
> They have been generated with a coccinelle script.
> The tricky parts are patches that use dma_alloc_coherent() because the correct
> GFP flag has to be used in place of the previous embedded GFP_ATOMIC.
> 
> [...]

Applied to 5.17/scsi-queue, thanks!

[10/16] scsi: message: fusion: Remove usage of the deprecated "pci-dma-compat.h" API
        https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/b114dda6f2f1
[11/16] scsi: mptbase: Use dma_alloc_coherent() in 'mpt_alloc_fw_memory()'
        https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/2d50607260a6
[12/16] scsi: mptbase: Use dma_alloc_coherent()
        https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/5c5e6b6f61e0
[13/16] scsi: mptsas: Use dma_alloc_coherent() in mptsas_exp_repmanufacture_info()
        https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/7a960b3a5e37
[14/16] scsi: mptsas: Use dma_alloc_coherent()
        https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/76a334d756c5
[15/16] scsi: mptctl: Use dma_alloc_coherent()
        https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/706dc3b91989
Moritz Fischer Jan. 25, 2022, 7:28 p.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 10:45:13PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> This serie axes all the remaining usages of the deprecated "pci-dma-compat.h"
> API.
> 
> All these patches have already been posted.
> 
> They have been generated with a coccinelle script.
> The tricky parts are patches that use dma_alloc_coherent() because the correct
> GFP flag has to be used in place of the previous embedded GFP_ATOMIC.
> 
> Patches 1-3 are already Reviewed. References to the corresponding mail is
> given below the ---
> 
> Patch 1-2,4-10 are just generated from the coccinelle script. Only too long
> lines have been hand modified. dma_alloc_coherent() modification are NOT part
> of these patches.
> 
> Patch 3 also includes some 'dma_set_mask_and_coherent()' instead of
> 'pci_set_dma_mask()/pci_set_consistent_dma_mask()'.
> I've left this additional modification because it was reviewed with it.
> 
> Patch 10-15 are the tricky parts. Explanation of which GFP flag is the right one
> is given in each patch. It has been divided in several patches to ease review.
> 
> Patch 15 is the only one I'm slighly unsure with. The old code was using a
> GFP_USER flag in the function. I'm not familiar with it.
> I *guess*  that GFP_KERNEL is fine, but maybe it should also be GFP_USER or left
> as GFP_ATOMIC so that nothing is changed.
> 
> Patch 16 is the last step that remove "pci-dma-compat.h" and its only usage.
> 
> 
> All patches, exept 1-2,6 that are architecture specific, have been compile tested.
> 
> 
> After all that, a few rst files, 1 or 2 strings in error messages and some
> error branching labels should still need some attention. 
> This is some minor issues.
> 
> 
> Only the cover letter is sent to every one. Each patch is sent to the
> corresponding maintainer(s) + Andrew Morton, Christoph Hellwig and Arnd Bergmann.
> 
> 
> Best regards.
> 
> 
> Christophe JAILLET (16):
>   alpha: Remove usage of the deprecated "pci-dma-compat.h" API
>   floppy: Remove usage of the deprecated "pci-dma-compat.h" API
>   fpga: dfl: pci: Remove usage of the deprecated "pci-dma-compat.h" API
>   media: Remove usage of the deprecated "pci-dma-compat.h" API
>   agp/intel: Remove usage of the deprecated "pci-dma-compat.h" API
>   sparc: Remove usage of the deprecated "pci-dma-compat.h" API
>   dmaengine: pch_dma: Remove usage of the deprecated "pci-dma-compat.h"
>     API
>   rapidio/tsi721: Remove usage of the deprecated "pci-dma-compat.h" API
>   media: v4l2-pci-skeleton: Remove usage of the deprecated
>     "pci-dma-compat.h" API
>   scsi: message: fusion: Remove usage of the deprecated
>     "pci-dma-compat.h" API
>   scsi: mptbase: Use dma_alloc_coherent() in 'mpt_alloc_fw_memory()'
>   scsi: mptbase: Use dma_alloc_coherent()
>   scsi: mptsas: Use dma_alloc_coherent() in
>     mptsas_exp_repmanufacture_info()
>   scsi: mptsas: Use dma_alloc_coherent()
>   scsi: mptctl: Use dma_alloc_coherent()
>   PCI: Remove usage of the deprecated "pci-dma-compat.h" API
> 
>  arch/alpha/include/asm/floppy.h     |   7 +-
>  arch/alpha/kernel/pci_iommu.c       |  12 +--
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/floppy.h   |   8 +-
>  arch/sparc/kernel/ioport.c          |   2 +-
>  drivers/char/agp/intel-gtt.c        |  26 ++---
>  drivers/dma/pch_dma.c               |   2 +-
>  drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c              |  14 +--
>  drivers/media/pci/cx18/cx18-queue.h |   6 +-
>  drivers/media/pci/ivtv/ivtv-queue.h |  25 +++--
>  drivers/media/pci/ivtv/ivtv-udma.h  |   8 +-
>  drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c    | 149 ++++++++++++++++------------
>  drivers/message/fusion/mptctl.c     |  82 +++++++++------
>  drivers/message/fusion/mptlan.c     |  90 +++++++++--------
>  drivers/message/fusion/mptsas.c     |  94 +++++++++---------
>  drivers/rapidio/devices/tsi721.c    |   8 +-
>  include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h      | 129 ------------------------
>  include/linux/pci.h                 |   3 -
>  samples/v4l/v4l2-pci-skeleton.c     |   2 +-
>  18 files changed, 289 insertions(+), 378 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h
> 
> -- 
> 2.32.0
> 
Applied [03/16] to linux-fpga for-next.

Thanks,
Moritz
Christoph Hellwig Feb. 23, 2022, 7:46 a.m. UTC | #4
Hi Christophe,

do you know what the state is in current linux-next?

I think we'll just want to queue up anything left at this point in the
dma-mapping or PCI tree and get it done.
Christophe JAILLET Feb. 23, 2022, 8:26 p.m. UTC | #5
Le 23/02/2022 à 08:46, Christoph Hellwig a écrit :
> Hi Christophe,
> 
> do you know what the state is in current linux-next?
> 
> I think we'll just want to queue up anything left at this point in the
> dma-mapping or PCI tree and get it done.
> 

Hi,

Patch 01, 04, 05, 06, 08, 09 have not reached -next yet.
They all still apply cleanly.

04 has been picked it up for inclusion in the media subsystem for 5.18.
The other ones all have 1 or more Reviewed-by:/Acked-by: tags.

Patch 16 must be resubmitted to add "#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>" in 
order not to break builds.


All the other patches have landed in -next.

CJ
Arnd Bergmann Feb. 23, 2022, 8:42 p.m. UTC | #6
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 9:26 PM Christophe JAILLET
<christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
>
> Le 23/02/2022 à 08:46, Christoph Hellwig a écrit :
> > Hi Christophe,
> >
> > do you know what the state is in current linux-next?
> >
> > I think we'll just want to queue up anything left at this point in the
> > dma-mapping or PCI tree and get it done.
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> Patch 01, 04, 05, 06, 08, 09 have not reached -next yet.
> They all still apply cleanly.
>
> 04 has been picked it up for inclusion in the media subsystem for 5.18.
> The other ones all have 1 or more Reviewed-by:/Acked-by: tags.
>
> Patch 16 must be resubmitted to add "#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>" in
> order not to break builds.
>
>
> All the other patches have landed in -next.

Ok, these all look trivial. I'd suggest you send the rebase version to
Andrew Morton then, so he can pick them all up into linux-mm, on top
of the linux-next contents.

         Arnd
Christoph Hellwig Feb. 24, 2022, 6:25 a.m. UTC | #7
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 09:26:56PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Patch 01, 04, 05, 06, 08, 09 have not reached -next yet.
> They all still apply cleanly.
> 
> 04 has been picked it up for inclusion in the media subsystem for 5.18.
> The other ones all have 1 or more Reviewed-by:/Acked-by: tags.
> 
> Patch 16 must be resubmitted to add "#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>" in
> order not to break builds.

So how about this:  I'll pick up 1, 5,6,8 and 9 for the dma-mapping
tree.  After -rc1 when presumably all other patches have reached
mainline your resubmit one with the added include and we finish this
off?

Thanks a lot for all your work already!
Arnd Bergmann Feb. 24, 2022, 7:07 a.m. UTC | #8
On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 7:25 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 09:26:56PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > Patch 01, 04, 05, 06, 08, 09 have not reached -next yet.
> > They all still apply cleanly.
> >
> > 04 has been picked it up for inclusion in the media subsystem for 5.18.
> > The other ones all have 1 or more Reviewed-by:/Acked-by: tags.
> >
> > Patch 16 must be resubmitted to add "#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>" in
> > order not to break builds.
>
> So how about this:  I'll pick up 1, 5,6,8 and 9 for the dma-mapping
> tree.  After -rc1 when presumably all other patches have reached
> mainline your resubmit one with the added include and we finish this
> off?

Sounds good to me as well.

       Arnd
Christophe JAILLET Feb. 24, 2022, 6:15 p.m. UTC | #9
Le 24/02/2022 à 08:07, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 7:25 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 09:26:56PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>>> Patch 01, 04, 05, 06, 08, 09 have not reached -next yet.
>>> They all still apply cleanly.
>>>
>>> 04 has been picked it up for inclusion in the media subsystem for 5.18.
>>> The other ones all have 1 or more Reviewed-by:/Acked-by: tags.
>>>
>>> Patch 16 must be resubmitted to add "#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>" in
>>> order not to break builds.
>> So how about this:  I'll pick up 1, 5,6,8 and 9 for the dma-mapping
>> tree.  After -rc1 when presumably all other patches have reached
>> mainline your resubmit one with the added include and we finish this
>> off?
> Sounds good to me as well.
>
>         Arnd

This is fine for me.
When all patches have reached -next, I'll re-submit the fixed 16th patch.


Thanks for your assistance for ending this long story :)

CJ
Christoph Hellwig Feb. 25, 2022, 4:20 p.m. UTC | #10
I've applied patches 1,5,6,8 and 9 to the dma-mapping tree.