Message ID | 20210625135834.12934-2-jlayton@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Not Applicable |
Headers | show
Return-Path: <linux-fscrypt-owner@kernel.org> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-19.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12696C48BC2 for <linux-fscrypt@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:58:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0BB361987 for <linux-fscrypt@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:58:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231465AbhFYOA6 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fscrypt@archiver.kernel.org>); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 10:00:58 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:60942 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229890AbhFYOA5 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 25 Jun 2021 10:00:57 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC2DF61956; Fri, 25 Jun 2021 13:58:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1624629516; bh=yCNNKLVqbExFzsrwpKfzckRntYEGnKYJ3zcgAvD6uYE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=EHf9n+EByZ1REM/3HkUiwFf0CCLnLs+lX2mvC5VPvPCFvSSJ9RSokFPaI0dIrW64W est1bUAqT/hAEwg3W7v2i7nSl4iWpGl+CR4scrhzfHoJNSccn2XOZBAUfO5sWrkgb0 kHdXNGjfVnWhiQWedjPMoF42RJ5YIQXXxEStrazKG69V1WGr1dYwBGevO99hoS3hWN WFkRdM0j/YGQkenEe5tPi/4+nSUw5/nkehMIg91czvAN38q+LjVvj225z4saX6lvia DUAhtdSZmtwRulASbf9SSvM0ajGuHdd2ZJGbIHXGntYqb3pJWA+u+u37XcKCjtzODL z50azdah/CIdQ== From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> To: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Cc: lhenriques@suse.de, xiubli@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Subject: [RFC PATCH v7 01/24] vfs: export new_inode_pseudo Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2021 09:58:11 -0400 Message-Id: <20210625135834.12934-2-jlayton@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20210625135834.12934-1-jlayton@kernel.org> References: <20210625135834.12934-1-jlayton@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: <linux-fscrypt.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org |
Series |
ceph+fscrypt: context, filename and symlink support
|
expand
|
diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c index c93500d84264..cf9ea4b260b0 100644 --- a/fs/inode.c +++ b/fs/inode.c @@ -941,6 +941,7 @@ struct inode *new_inode_pseudo(struct super_block *sb) } return inode; } +EXPORT_SYMBOL(new_inode_pseudo); /** * new_inode - obtain an inode
Ceph needs to be able to allocate inodes ahead of a create that might involve a fscrypt-encrypted inode. new_inode() almost fits the bill, but it puts the inode on the sb->s_inodes list and when we go to hash it, that might be done again. We could work around that by setting I_CREATING on the new inode, but that causes ilookup5 to return -ESTALE if something tries to find it before I_NEW is cleared. This is desirable behavior for most filesystems, but doesn't work for ceph. To work around all of this, just use new_inode_pseudo which doesn't add it to the sb->s_inodes list. Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> --- fs/inode.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)