From patchwork Thu Jul 4 00:35:57 2019 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Brendan Higgins X-Patchwork-Id: 11030703 Return-Path: Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org [172.30.200.125]) by pdx-korg-patchwork-2.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4E318E8 for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 00:37:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70DCA28682 for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 00:37:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix, from userid 486) id 6471828A3E; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 00:37:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on pdx-wl-mail.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.5 required=2.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.wl.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC0C928917 for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2019 00:37:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727462AbfGDAhD (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jul 2019 20:37:03 -0400 Received: from mail-vk1-f202.google.com ([209.85.221.202]:34675 "EHLO mail-vk1-f202.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727326AbfGDAhD (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Jul 2019 20:37:03 -0400 Received: by mail-vk1-f202.google.com with SMTP id 21so450606vki.1 for ; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 17:37:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:message-id:mime-version:subject:from:to:cc; bh=3dkcwHp7UkbBjeC+jKJgdEez1r7JnE/QFVNxh/Av3lE=; b=P/9Q0U57X0Mjr2pSdVR3fq5Q9Stk+yaqd+YUm9sq0ou6AVsZSt/1N/33ozuhbgY2vA l95M1OTPG7AMpCdkXNxZwoF74wXCpWnPckCjmlCUOfpVWb6OUe1dqoKeBMLQ2rRoWAC+ fNHaGobDGBWH78hBlHjYyz8R5pV2r1lKhN6q853RMfM6pw8GA8VVYjvcvo3uf8gDuuir ENB2mZWRXg62IrhKkC86LfkNF4vHPkE6nmhUv9Xome467fLx+E9J0pgZrqEdzyy++0mz 884zs7eBSkOyiHbrPJJuzc+Z2DaP9Fz7PcxSltbsQgqsrKy/bR2ai8bDNYsLrfqN7e+f Qiwg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:message-id:mime-version:subject:from:to:cc; bh=3dkcwHp7UkbBjeC+jKJgdEez1r7JnE/QFVNxh/Av3lE=; b=RVxOw8JrweckakJJY+imvbT/619ioLbfNnZ81MB3IPHzLbm7SQpmf3Mt6Uej8c51SI aXQ2RamrRay8nCJra8svIsGRpfaGYMqWy4c21oiSyW81dSF3MKwqK3Ko0r15e5tnA0yT 2jYshYy4uGIUBZ6o9nBq4ZFmow4tNY6CuRj/Xgrtu8zsTJdFmQ5uCUBPfb7TcMfflHpC JsLUxflxRTHYnlUMLadzhHejtlloVbHOdq2LduLvt9YaX0asS95UVWKiEJss4PCSHPcE uzRWQBrNLg/P41zexmrAajvLDzrfVFTd1okUcIYYni5aLsxyGORDF1StgHIBockDDBeL OWog== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXpqgrU/Jarhj3tmCJfZ+HhcIh6oNI6/CIqxbx+XJ2JdyQNXzLN JnqRHvzpvNutZ7ctmjuWJwGW6SCfytqMFKwaHe3rmA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxifi+9P2uuB2xECPxDjII80enpIo8mSlNTAxiC8KmAvRxtyVWjtDGXaCnqTdPCo5Xn7dOc4Z0daGhonP28ve9Qzg== X-Received: by 2002:a1f:5945:: with SMTP id n66mr6468396vkb.58.1562200621022; Wed, 03 Jul 2019 17:37:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2019 17:35:57 -0700 Message-Id: <20190704003615.204860-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.22.0.410.gd8fdbe21b5-goog Subject: [PATCH v6 00/18] kunit: introduce KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework From: Brendan Higgins To: frowand.list@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, keescook@google.com, kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com, mcgrof@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, robh@kernel.org, sboyd@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, yamada.masahiro@socionext.com Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, Alexander.Levin@microsoft.com, Tim.Bird@sony.com, amir73il@gmail.com, dan.carpenter@oracle.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, jdike@addtoit.com, joel@jms.id.au, julia.lawall@lip6.fr, khilman@baylibre.com, knut.omang@oracle.com, logang@deltatee.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, pmladek@suse.com, rdunlap@infradead.org, richard@nod.at, rientjes@google.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, wfg@linux.intel.com, Brendan Higgins Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP ## TL;DR This is a pretty straightforward follow-up to Stephen and Luis' comments on PATCH v5: There is nothing that really changes any functionality or usage with the minor exception that I renamed `struct kunit_module` to `struct kunit_suite`. Nevertheless, a good deal of clean ups and fixes. See "Changes Since Last Version" section below. As for our current status, right now we got Reviewed-bys on all patches except: - [PATCH v6 08/18] objtool: add kunit_try_catch_throw to the noreturn list However, it would probably be good to get reviews/acks from the subsystem maintainers on: - [PATCH v6 06/18] kbuild: enable building KUnit - [PATCH v6 08/18] objtool: add kunit_try_catch_throw to the noreturn list - [PATCH v6 15/18] Documentation: kunit: add documentation for KUnit - [PATCH v6 17/18] kernel/sysctl-test: Add null pointer test for sysctl.c:proc_dointvec() Other than that, I think we should be good to go. ## Background This patch set proposes KUnit, a lightweight unit testing and mocking framework for the Linux kernel. Unlike Autotest and kselftest, KUnit is a true unit testing framework; it does not require installing the kernel on a test machine or in a VM (however, KUnit still allows you to run tests on test machines or in VMs if you want[1]) and does not require tests to be written in userspace running on a host kernel. Additionally, KUnit is fast: From invocation to completion KUnit can run several dozen tests in about a second. Currently, the entire KUnit test suite for KUnit runs in under a second from the initial invocation (build time excluded). KUnit is heavily inspired by JUnit, Python's unittest.mock, and Googletest/Googlemock for C++. KUnit provides facilities for defining unit test cases, grouping related test cases into test suites, providing common infrastructure for running tests, mocking, spying, and much more. ### What's so special about unit testing? A unit test is supposed to test a single unit of code in isolation, hence the name. There should be no dependencies outside the control of the test; this means no external dependencies, which makes tests orders of magnitudes faster. Likewise, since there are no external dependencies, there are no hoops to jump through to run the tests. Additionally, this makes unit tests deterministic: a failing unit test always indicates a problem. Finally, because unit tests necessarily have finer granularity, they are able to test all code paths easily solving the classic problem of difficulty in exercising error handling code. ### Is KUnit trying to replace other testing frameworks for the kernel? No. Most existing tests for the Linux kernel are end-to-end tests, which have their place. A well tested system has lots of unit tests, a reasonable number of integration tests, and some end-to-end tests. KUnit is just trying to address the unit test space which is currently not being addressed. ### More information on KUnit There is a bunch of documentation near the end of this patch set that describes how to use KUnit and best practices for writing unit tests. For convenience I am hosting the compiled docs here[2]. Additionally for convenience, I have applied these patches to a branch[3]. The repo may be cloned with: git clone https://kunit.googlesource.com/linux This patchset is on the kunit/rfc/v5.2-rc7/v6 branch. ## Changes Since Last Version Aside from renaming `struct kunit_module` to `struct kunit_suite`, there isn't really anything in here that changes any functionality: - Rebased on v5.2-rc7 - Got rid of spinlocks. - Now update success field using WRITE_ONCE. - Suggested by Stephen - Other instances replaced by mutex. - Suggested by Stephen and Luis - Renamed `struct kunit_module` to `struct kunit_suite`. - Inspired by Luis. - Fixed a broken example of how to use kunit_tool. - Pointed out by Ted - Added descriptions to unit tests. - Suggested by Luis - Labeled unit tests which tested the API. - Suggested by Luis - Made a number of minor cleanups. - Suggested by Luis and Stephen. [1] https://google.github.io/kunit-docs/third_party/kernel/docs/usage.html#kunit-on-non-uml-architectures [2] https://google.github.io/kunit-docs/third_party/kernel/docs/ [3] https://kunit.googlesource.com/linux/+/kunit/rfc/v5.2-rc7/v6