From patchwork Tue Sep 24 19:23:49 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" X-Patchwork-Id: 13811128 Received: from mout-p-201.mailbox.org (mout-p-201.mailbox.org [80.241.56.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8E4E1B85F1; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 19:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.171 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727205846; cv=none; b=ZFKra+/JLkuRv4wcem+Cqv9y6vj4i0HEONEriBFV9S4f1EjdypI5eML4Zwbmrea1QQZnUWrQwaXKLODQKbDEFh9OZR1PxxHe5QCLVaW4Dc5chnnW0YWn15T2Ee2otNsMH9PCyMTFVfIC8MlYbCIEzO4MVySik67Y1AJ6BQNCP0w= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727205846; c=relaxed/simple; bh=NDG6ALr1R5N6nYXJ1mUALoq8v7Z6f/xPQjOScNhTEyU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=gG3GBH9X6S/zdhJC8QOpWbxZA2JfIwJ0ncZYf77gil7wk9DL9/0115/+VGlOYUY2XS0zX6vsc4la4z5dyaLcrHIBRI+4t7xG0k98QmEFo++oWxFg3Zk5I/o+2u6WhShCDtHi2WYB18rTTQRqXdMYcGbBTdS9GX8XRnKhGdx/J0o= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=pankajraghav.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pankajraghav.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pankajraghav.com header.i=@pankajraghav.com header.b=vQk6gcxW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.171 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=pankajraghav.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pankajraghav.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pankajraghav.com header.i=@pankajraghav.com header.b="vQk6gcxW" Received: from smtp2.mailbox.org (smtp2.mailbox.org [10.196.197.2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-201.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4XCqXw0Vt4z9tjc; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 21:24:00 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pankajraghav.com; s=MBO0001; t=1727205840; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=17WJMeltX8R2P17eHC1mKHMp6fqbwE3q9+yXZvGUQ2g=; b=vQk6gcxW3DP8rDJl7tkU4Z1ma6xPXDGpAGqwngp8Xu7t693wOfnxXRmhpSjRM72BVX0SyP VkUx/foV1Xvi6q1+quo+lpfoXy9+5tU2reelB7gdI+0OX4f0EqRnzEgNxVMSWE17BK60w4 aK2t3McrWYQ14D7Wc1JQHqEtnZXoOCvIHti1z86BAdF/lYIQ2i/SDKR1MTisyhMRj3dbtC VYIXltQFxqjGToLJPSVJ7M1mcbRTP59rS4begZ0avh7QRZWDBxRCzeeZjK7qzRmVkXsmaf KwEGRnalRYaAc/ms8hnIKpUJEIjaE+FqVMywx0QHlDwBJwPfdlYVsY8Y3EIuXQ== From: "Pankaj Raghav (Samsung)" To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: willy@infradead.org, mcgrof@kernel.org, gost.dev@samsung.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, kernel@pankajraghav.com, Christian Brauner , Pankaj Raghav Subject: [PATCH 0/2] add block size > page size support to ramfs Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 21:23:49 +0200 Message-ID: <20240924192351.74728-1-kernel@pankajraghav.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Pankaj Raghav Add block size > page size to ramfs as we support minimum folio order allocation in the page cache. The changes are very minimal, and this is also a nice way to stress test just the page cache changes for minimum folio order. I tested the changes from blocksize 4k to 2M with ltp's fsx on an x86 machine. I ran a basic perf test with dd as follows: $ mount ramfs -t ramfs -o blocksize=$bs /media/test/ $ dd if=/mnt/rand of="/media/test/rand" bs=2M count=2048 +------+----------+ | bs | BW(GB/s) | +------+----------+ | 4k | 1.7 | | 8k | 2.4 | | 16k | 3.2 | | 32k | 4.0 | | 64k | 4.5 | | 128k | 4.8 | | 256k | 5.3 | | 512k | 5.5 | | 1M | 5.6 | | 2M | 5.6 | +------+----------+ We get better performance for larger bs as we allocate larger folios instead of multiple smaller folios when there is no memory fragmentation and pressure. Pankaj Raghav (2): ramfs: add blocksize mount option ramfs: enable block size > page size fs/ramfs/inode.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) base-commit: 4d0326b60bb753627437fff0f76bf1525bcda422